Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Clark (director): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Delete |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*Just nothing that based on the commonality of the name, a search is going to be very hard due to false positives. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 14:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
*Just nothing that based on the commonality of the name, a search is going to be very hard due to false positives. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 14:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', a search under "Richard Clark Doctor Who director", "Richard Clark The Musketeers director" etc only brought up two sources that were not directory listings or Wikipedia mirrors, [https://www.outlandertvnews.com/2014/02/richard-clark-directing-episodes-of-outlander/ this] which is ''extremely'' iffy but does have an editorial team, so it might be a reliable source, and [https://radiofreeskaro.com/2010/08/25/adam-smith-richard-clark-return-to-direct-series-6/ this], which is just a Doctor Who fan podcast. As such, he fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Devonian Wombat|Devonian Wombat]] ([[User talk:Devonian Wombat|talk]]) 01:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', a search under "Richard Clark Doctor Who director", "Richard Clark The Musketeers director" etc only brought up two sources that were not directory listings or Wikipedia mirrors, [https://www.outlandertvnews.com/2014/02/richard-clark-directing-episodes-of-outlander/ this] which is ''extremely'' iffy but does have an editorial team, so it might be a reliable source, and [https://radiofreeskaro.com/2010/08/25/adam-smith-richard-clark-return-to-direct-series-6/ this], which is just a Doctor Who fan podcast. As such, he fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Devonian Wombat|Devonian Wombat]] ([[User talk:Devonian Wombat|talk]]) 01:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per above reasoning he fails [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:BIO]] nor [[WP:FILMMAKER]]. [[User:Nassimela|Nassimela]] ([[User talk:Nassimela|talk]]) 21:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:05, 13 September 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard Clark (director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has hardly been edited over many years, and has been tagged for improvement for two years. There are only two references; one is dead, the other is only an award announcement. Fails WP:BIO due to not having received significant coverage in multiple published independent sources. While there is an exception for a person who has received an award or honour, the award in this case was given to the work (an episode of Doctor Who) and not to the person. Checking against WP:FILMMAKER also fails; 1, not widely cited; 2, nothing of significance cited; 3, handful of episodes, not a major role; 4, work does not appear to have attained required level of significance. H. Carver (talk) 03:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and United Kingdom. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Just nothing that based on the commonality of the name, a search is going to be very hard due to false positives. Jclemens (talk) 14:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, a search under "Richard Clark Doctor Who director", "Richard Clark The Musketeers director" etc only brought up two sources that were not directory listings or Wikipedia mirrors, this which is extremely iffy but does have an editorial team, so it might be a reliable source, and this, which is just a Doctor Who fan podcast. As such, he fails WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above reasoning he fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO nor WP:FILMMAKER. Nassimela (talk) 21:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)