Jump to content

Talk:2008 California Proposition 8: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:2008 California Proposition 8/Archive 1) (bot
Line 55: Line 55:


I don't think [[November 15, 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests]] was impactful enough to merit an article separate from this – maybe this warrants a few sentences to a paragraph as a merge to this article? [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[user talk:theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) (she/[[singular they|they]]) 18:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't think [[November 15, 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests]] was impactful enough to merit an article separate from this – maybe this warrants a few sentences to a paragraph as a merge to this article? [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[user talk:theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) (she/[[singular they|they]]) 18:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. The protests article is primarily a list of locations, and if it is cut, the rest of the content is short enough to be combined into a paragraph. [[User:Hanif Al Husaini|Hanif Al Husaini]] ([[User talk:Hanif Al Husaini|talk]]) 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:34, 29 August 2022

Former good article nominee2008 California Proposition 8 was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
May 17, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Grammatical Error

In section 3.3.1, the first sentence is grammatically incorrect. The word "while" is used twice, the first use of "while" should be removed to fix the sentence. H, H, R... character (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. --Nat Gertler (talk) 10:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sentence

I saw a reference to Prop 8 on a CDP article. I hovered over it and all it said was that it was a proposition and constitutional amendment that passed. Could have been a tax law, or bail reform, or anything. Given MOS:FIRST, it seems to me that the first sentence should at least introduce the topic of the law. Also, describing it as "passed" but not saying it is no longer in effect also seems to bury the lead.

  • Old version: Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment that passed in the November 2008 California state elections.
  • New version: Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court.

It seems to be overly technical to have both the proposition and constitutional amendment references, though they are technically correct.

  • Shorter still version: Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition to ban same-sex marriage that passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court.

Discuss. Chris vLS (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I don't think November 15, 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests was impactful enough to merit an article separate from this – maybe this warrants a few sentences to a paragraph as a merge to this article? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 18:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]