Jump to content

User talk:Mupper-san: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 216: Line 216:


Howdy. Don't you think you should seek a consensus first, for removing full birth names from bio infoboxes? Would save you a waste of time, if editors revert all your deletions. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 07:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. Don't you think you should seek a consensus first, for removing full birth names from bio infoboxes? Would save you a waste of time, if editors revert all your deletions. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 07:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
:GoodDay, I don't believe there's a need to build a consensus individually per article - especially it's reflected in the infobox (on visual editor) to "only use [birth_name] if different from name". As these aren't pseudonyms nor do they differ from the subject's most well-known name (except in certain cases, such as Bill Clinton), my point of view is that such edits are simply following that which the infobox creators intended for birth_name to be used for. [[User:Mupper-san|Mupper-san]] ([[User talk:Mupper-san#top|talk]]) 07:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

::All your bold deletions have been reverted. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 07:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
:Good day,
:I don't believe there's a need to build a consensus individually per article - especially it's reflected in the infobox (on visual editor) to "only use [birth_name] if different from name". As these aren't pseudonyms nor do they differ from the subject's most well-known name (except in certain cases, such as Bill Clinton), my point of view is that such edits are simply following that which the infobox creators intended for birth_name to be used for.
:[[User:Mupper-san|Mupper-san]] ([[User talk:Mupper-san#top|talk]]) 07:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:21, 22 July 2022

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 00:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kartlos Gharibashvili moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kartlos Gharibashvili, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pyotr Masherov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nevel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultan Ibraimov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirghiz Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your recent series of edits on short-description of LGBT rights in XYZ. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting read and well-written, and something I would've never known about otherwise. There probably aren't any images available for such a topic, but I think just an infobox would be enough for b5 and B-Class. Cheers mate, KeeperOfThePeace (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect short description

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California has a short description that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The description s are helpful to people browsing an article. Please read the first first line on the article before adding a standard Short description to article. I corrected a few but it would be great if you went back and corrected the many tribe articles you have described as a reservation. Thanks Fettlemap (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kartlos Gharibashvili

Information icon Hello, Mupper-san. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kartlos Gharibashvili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kartlos Gharibashvili

Hello, Mupper-san. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kartlos Gharibashvili".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walenty Wańkowicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos for a well written article! I wanted to inform you that I have nominated a fact from the article to appear on Wikipedia's main page in the Did you know section. You can find the nomination here. Please feel free to nominate alternate hooks/facts if you like. Ciridae (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Rahačoŭ District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rakaŭ Ghetto

On 25 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rakaŭ Ghetto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an estimated 1,050 Jews were killed in the Rakaŭ Ghetto between its creation and liquidation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rakaŭ Ghetto. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rakaŭ Ghetto), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for inspiring me to create my own Wikipedia account. IllyrianThePhilo-Semite (talk) 04:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Millerovo air base attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Millerovo air base attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millerovo air base attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Yakudza (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Dubinsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions of "none" are correct

Hello, I've run into a couple of lists where you've changed the short description from "none" to "Wikipedia list article" or similar. That is not correct. The rational is described at WP:SDNONE. I'll correct the ones on my watchlist, but if there are others, please correct those too. Thanks and let me know if I can help with anything. SchreiberBike | ⌨  03:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
I sincerely apologise for my incorrect edits; on mobile, the usage of "none" for the SD simply shows as if there was no SD, hence me making the edits. I wasn't able to see that an SD of "none" was already in place.
As far as I can recall, there should be no more which are not already reverted. However, if I do see any I have made, I will be certain to correct them.
Once again, sincerest apologies!
Mupper-san (talk) 04:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So interesting. I've found it difficult to edit on mobile and I seldom do it. Take care and keep up the good work. Also, please use edit summaries so other editors can tell why you've made an edit. SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, and you keep up the good work as well! On the matter of edit summaries; I do tend to fully detail my changes and reasoning in edit summaries, but the automatic SD editor on mobile (for some reason) doesn't provide such things, so unfortunately, I'm not provided the opportunity to provide my reasoning while using it.
Mupper-san (talk) 04:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you are adding short descriptions to election articles again – they should be "none" as the article title is descriptive. Also this one was a parliamentary election, not a presidential one. Cheers, Number 57 19:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect - see German, American, French, and British elections for reference. Unlike some other articles, there is a precedent for articles about elections to have short descriptions.
Mupper-san (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mupper-san

Thank you for creating 36th Separate Marine Brigade.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mupper-san

Thank you for creating Loŭčycy.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alert for Indian pages

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

LearnIndology (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate article

See WP:CFORK and avoid article duplication. LearnIndology (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As explained this is not a content fork. One article is about a person, the other is about an event.VR talk 05:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your Wikihounding is just not enough to change it. Its a plain WP:POVFORK created by violating copyrights. LearnIndology (talk) 05:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Karakalpak protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barron's.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2022 Karakalpak protests

On 5 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Karakalpak protests, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 01:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sri lanka civil war

Hi your recent edits to the sri lankan civil war intro page, has removed almost all the references, even from the text that you preserved from the previous intro. This is a very heated and controversial article and has gone thought countless heated arguments and debates. Removing the sources is not a good idea, as most of the content of the intro can now be removed with a claim of "removing unsourced information". So i anticipate further conflicts if this is not rectified. Oz346 (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346 To my knowledge, removing sources here shouldn't be a problem, as the introduction is meant to reflect information which is found in the rest of the article, which should be sourced. See Tony Blair or World War II, for example. The lead shouldn't introduce information only found in the lead, and, as such, sources are a better fit in parts of the article where the content actually originates from - at least, that's how I've always considered it.
Mupper-san (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing full birthnames from bio infoboxes

Howdy. Don't you think you should seek a consensus first, for removing full birth names from bio infoboxes? Would save you a waste of time, if editors revert all your deletions. GoodDay (talk) 07:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GoodDay, I don't believe there's a need to build a consensus individually per article - especially it's reflected in the infobox (on visual editor) to "only use [birth_name] if different from name". As these aren't pseudonyms nor do they differ from the subject's most well-known name (except in certain cases, such as Bill Clinton), my point of view is that such edits are simply following that which the infobox creators intended for birth_name to be used for. Mupper-san (talk) 07:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All your bold deletions have been reverted. GoodDay (talk) 07:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]