Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Black (San Francisco): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:55, 10 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No redirect since it's a very unlikely search term. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rob_Black_(San_Francisco)

We do not have pages for most other failed supervisorial candidates, and went through this deletion process with at least one other (Alix Rosenthal). Page is only linked to from two or three other pages, and page is a stub and likely to remain that way. Brainslug 15:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 21:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 21:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Failed local candidate. Not a smidgen of notability or accomplishment in the article, but if you go to his bio on his web site...well, there's not much there, either. --Calton | Talk 06:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care. If you delete I recommend redirecting to San Francisco, California, election, 2006 and including a link there on the disambiguation page. Suldrew 23:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete failing in an election is not notable in itself and there are no other notability claims (or sources) offered. Nuttah68 12:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Revision as of 01:05, 2 March 2007 edit Aecis (talk \| contribs) 36,712 edits Post closing !vote removed ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:55, 10 February 2022 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*'''Delete''' failing in an election is not notable in itself and there are no other notability claims (or sources) offered. [[User:Nuttah68\|Nuttah68]] 12:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' failing in an election is not notable in itself and there are no other notability claims (or sources) offered. [[User:Nuttah68\|Nuttah68]] 12:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>