Jump to content

User talk:Samuel J Walker: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
2021-22 Leicester: new section
Undid revision 1058327821 by OscarWongLara1999 (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 360: Line 360:
</table>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->

== 2021-22 Leicester ==

Why did you errase the information of Wes Morgan in the Leicester City 2021-22 Season Samuel Gay Walker
NIGGA BITCH
--[[User:OscarWongLara1999|OscarWongLara1999]] ([[User talk:OscarWongLara1999|talk]]) 21:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:41, 2 December 2021

Welcome!

Hello, Samuel J Walker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel J Walker, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Samuel J Walker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Struway2. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Birmingham City F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Struway2 (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teddy Davison with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 22:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Grand Theft Auto V soundtrack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 15:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] and [2] both says the 6 players "are leaving in the summer, when their contracts run out". Nobody's contract runs out in May, they all last until 30 June, so that's when they'll actually leave the club. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Johnson

Hi why did you delete my post that he's currently a free agent? How else should I describe in the Infobox that he no longer has a club? I added that for clarity as it's not clear in his Infobox whether he plays or not at the moment. Huddsblue (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello. Please do not remove information from an article without explaining why in an edit summary. Otherwise other editors might think you are vandalising the article. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the more intricate details of Beeching's address because, as far as I was aware, Wikipedia didn't post full addresses. Also, I was clearing the infobox of a number of unused parameters. Samuel J Walker (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem with removing unused parameters. However the place of death might be seen as relevant. An edit summary would help make your motives clear. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Secondly, regarding the Adam Johnson edit. The totalcaps parameter is usually reserved for retired players. I'd added it originally but decided to remove it because Johnson isn't retired (at least by choice) and it doesn't feature on Ched Evans' page either. Samuel J Walker (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fair enough. But please use those edit summaries! Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Derek Leckenby does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Edit summaries don't have to be detailed; for a list of commonly-used abbreviations, see Wikipedia:Edit summary legend/Quick reference. Miniapolis 15:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ollie Banks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 06:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lennard Pearce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Chesterfield F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Samuel J Walker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3rd opinion Gateshead

3rd opinion on Gateshead

Hello Samuel J Walker, I have asked for mediation on the Gateshead article. Also here is the talk url on the Gateshead talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gateshead#Gateshead_County_Borough_Citation 82.13.142.140 (talk) for your view 07:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I went to the wrong place I should have gone here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Third_opinion I'll put that down to my lack of experience with the dispute resolution process. However I am always willing to compromise. How about this edit? 'Part of County Durham until 1835[1] when the town became a part of Gateshead County Borough,[1] part of Gateshead County Borough until 1974 when the town became part of Gateshead Metropolitan Borough;[1] Gateshead... and so on' I'd say that is neutral.Barkleave09 (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wimbledon

Hi. Could you give a rationale for this edit? Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Until 1965 Wimbledon was in Surrey and not considered part of London. Samuel J Walker (talk) 21:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Is there a consensus that this sort of edit is a good thing? --John (talk) 23:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if there's a consensus on anything. I think it's probably fairly minor, though some people I've come across do appreciate these types of edits. For me personally, I have an interest in the historic counties so I try and correct any errors I come across, so I think it's probably an "as and when" thing rather than a consensus. Hope that helps. Samuel J Walker (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the sort of thing I have seen people get very upset over. It might be worth having a central discussion, or finding if one has already taken place. It shouldn't be marked as minor I think. --John (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the 'hidden advice re DoD...my attempt to do the same got lost in an edit conflict I think. Please note quotes in boldname should be outside the bolding per WP:MOSLEAD and / or WP:QUOTENAME. Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Gateshead". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 9 December 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 08:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Placenames

I'm not that happy that you didn't reply to my last note above, but went straight to this. Can you have a think about what you are doing and get back to me please. --John (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get back to your previous reply because I was at work. My point is highlighted here, most prominently in the "use modern names section". I point to this part of it: "Older names should be used in appropriate historical contexts when a substantial majority of reliable modern sources does the same; this includes the names of articles relating to particular historical periods". Between 1949 and 1990 there were two "Germanys", the FRG (West Germany) and GDR (East Germany), likewise with East and West Berlin. The reason I changed it was because at the time of Merkel's birth, Hamburg was in the FRG, which was West Germany. On a similar note, if you look at Vladimir Putin's page, the infobox there reads that he was born in Leningrad, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union, because that is what it was at the time of his birth. Samuel J Walker (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, it makes sense. I recommend that you link to this guideline in your edit summary, and certainly do not mark such edits as minor. I am well aware of 20th-century European history and know that the names can change over time. I am also aware that here on Wikipedia making such changes can be controversial, as it can be in real life. Such changes can generate heat out of all proportion to their real utility to the encyclopedia, so you should be prepared to discuss such changes case-by-case if asked. Guidelines are not binding in this project and it is perfectly possible that local consensus may over-ride it on occasion. So long as you bear this in mind, use informative edit summaries and keep a sense of proportion about consistency, you should be fine. Thanks again, --John (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the time I do not mark edits like those as minor, this one must have slipped through the net. I am aware that making such edits can be hot topics and I usually leave edit summaries explaining my actions. What I sometimes do is leave the internal notes if there are quite a few edit wars over these issues (one such page is the Paul Hollywood page over the county of his birth), and most of the time these edits are made with minimum fuss. Thanks for the heads-up though, I'll bear it in mind. Samuel J Walker (talk) 20:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Gateshead, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

References

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

I'm not at all sure I get the logic for changing the county in which Asquith died to Berkshire. He died in Sutton Courtenay, a town now in Oxfordshire. If I want to find his grave, that's the county I go to. I think it's just plain confusing to use the old county boundary. I've reverted your edit. If you want to put Berkshire back, could you discuss on the article Talkpage. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 00:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't agree, but by all means raise it on the Talkpage. KJP1 (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Timestamp

Hi.

When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chesterfield F.C.

Hi,

I see that you have made many edits to Chesterfield F.C.. The page seems vandalized to me, but I don't know enough about it to safely make corrections. I wonder if you could look at it?

Cheers Dan D. Ric (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milton Keynes postcodes

I'll open a discussion at talk:Milton Keynes. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Samuel J Walker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bump. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Norwich City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fleck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dorchester, Dorset. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ryan Allsop. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Allsop. Still no source cited in the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ben Marshall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leicester City squad template

Hey, there are some Leicester youth players hidden in the template for when they get squad numbers including Josh Knight so just have a check if they are there as there may be no need to write them out fully. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 16:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew McNulty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jimmy Walker (footballer, born 1973), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 03:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Samuel J Walker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samuel. You made a revert here with the edit summary "Edited for consistency. Most other articles are laid out in this way." I wonder do you mean "all UK bio articles", or possibly "all UK bio articles where the individual was born in Wales", or possibly "all UK bio articles where the individual was born and died in two different countries", or possibly something else? I'd also be interested to see your supporting evidence. I tried to ask in my edit summary if there was any WP:MoS policy on this. I'm now guessing, from your edit summary, that you are suggesting there is not. Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ben Godfrey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Round, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Use Talk pages to explain changes you wish to make, showing your sources. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fawlty Towers

Hi, just regarding the Fawlty Towers episode, Communication Problems, which edition of the VHS do you have? Aefevans (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fawlty Towers

Hi, thanks for your reply. Interestingly, the VHS I was referring to is dated 1984 (the edition can be seen here: http://www.videocollector.co.uk/fawlty-towers---basil-the-rat/29477). Maybe it's something they rectified in that time? I'll have to dig out my copy. Aefevans (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Released players

Players who are "released" merely will not have their contract renwed. They will not leave club until 30 June 2019, OK? GiantSnowman 15:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NG postcode area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Angelis

died on March 19, 2009. You keep changing it and are upsetting his family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.121.231.74 (talk) 20:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Targett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DL postcode area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hambleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–21 Leicester City F.C. season. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sakiv (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Geoffrey McGivern, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DarkGlow (talk) 13:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aston Oxborough for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aston Oxborough, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Oxborough until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021-22 Leicester

Why did you errase the information of Wes Morgan in the Leicester City 2021-22 Season Samuel Gay Walker NIGGA BITCH --OscarWongLara1999 (talk) 21:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]