Jump to content

NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
O.mangold (talk | contribs)
70 edits
Add internal link to SIKE
Adding a reference for signature category call for proposals.
Line 231: Line 231:


==Round three==
==Round three==
On July 22, 2020, NIST announced seven finalists ("first track"), as well as eight alternate algorithms ("second track"). The first track contains the algorithms which appear to have the most promise, and will be considered for standardization at the end of the third round. Algorithms in the second track could still become part of the standard, after the third round ends.<ref name="2ndround">{{cite web|url=https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8309/final |title=Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process |access-date=2020-07-23}}</ref> NIST expects some of the alternate candidates to be considered in a fourth round.
On July 22, 2020, NIST announced seven finalists ("first track"), as well as eight alternate algorithms ("second track"). The first track contains the algorithms which appear to have the most promise, and will be considered for standardization at the end of the third round. Algorithms in the second track could still become part of the standard, after the third round ends.<ref name="2ndround">{{cite web|url=https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8309/final |title=Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process |access-date=2020-07-23}}</ref> NIST expects some of the alternate candidates to be considered in a fourth round. NIST also suggests it may re-open the signature category for new schemes proposals in the future.<ref>{{Citation|title=Third PQC Standardization Conference - Session I Welcome/Candidate Updates|url=https://www.nist.gov/video/third-pqc-standardization-conference-session-i-welcomecandidate-updates|language=en|access-date=2021-07-06}}</ref>


===Finalists===
===Finalists===

Revision as of 12:28, 6 July 2021

Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization[1] is a program and competition by NIST to update their standards to include post-quantum cryptography.[2] It was announced at PQCrypto 2016.[3] 23 signature schemes and 59 encryption/KEM schemes were submitted by the initial submission deadline at the end of 2017[4] of which 69 total were deemed complete and proper and participated in the first round. Seven of these, of which 3 are signature schemes, have advanced to the third round, which was announced on July 22, 2020.

Background

Academic research on the potential impact of quantum computing dates back to at least 2001.[5] A NIST published report from April 2016 cites experts that acknowledge the possibility of quantum technology to render the commonly used RSA algorithm insecure by 2030.[6] As a result, a need to standardize quantum-secure cryptographic primitives was pursued. Since most symmetric primitives are relatively easy to modify in a way that makes them quantum resistant, efforts have focused on public-key cryptography, namely digital signatures and key encapsulation mechanisms. In December 2016 NIST initiated a standardization process by announcing a call for proposals.[7]

The competition is now in its third round out of expected four, where in each round some algorithms are discarded and others are studied more closely. NIST hopes to publish the standardization documents by 2024, but may speed up the process if major breakthroughs in quantum computing are made.

It is currently undecided whether the future standards be published as FIPS or as NIST Special Publication (SP).

Round one

Under consideration were:[8]
(strikethrough means it had been withdrawn)

Type PKE/KEM Signature Signature & PKE/KEM
Lattice
  • Compact LWE
  • CRYSTALS-KYBER
  • Ding Key Exchange
  • EMBLEM and R.EMBLEM
  • FrodoKEM
  • HILA5 (withdrawn and merged into round 5)
  • KCL (pka OKCN/AKCN/CNKE)
  • KINDI
  • LAC
  • LIMA
  • Lizard
  • LOTUS
  • NewHope
  • NTRUEncrypt[9]
  • NTRU-HRSS-KEM
  • NTRU Prime
  • Odd Manhattan
  • Round2 (withdrawn and merged into Round5)
  • Round5 (merger of Round2 and Hila5, announced 4 August 2018)[10]
  • SABER
  • Three Bears
  • Titanium
Code-based
  • BIG QUAKE
  • BIKE
  • Classic McEliece + NTS-KEM
  • DAGS
  • Edon-K
  • HQC
  • LAKE (withdrawn and merged into ROLLO)
  • LEDAkem
  • LEDApkc
  • Lepton
  • LOCKER (withdrawn and merged into ROLLO)
  • McNie
  • NTS-KEM
  • ROLLO (merger of Ouroboros-R, LAKE and LOCKER) [11]
  • Ouroboros-R (withdrawn and merged into ROLLO)
  • QC-MDPC KEM
  • Ramstake
  • RLCE-KEM
  • RQC
  • pqsigRM
  • RaCoSS
  • RankSign
Hash-based
  • Gravity-SPHINCS
  • SPHINCS+
Multivariate
  • CFPKM
  • Giophantus
  • DualModeMS
  • GeMSS
  • Gui
  • HiMQ-3
  • LUOV
  • MQDSS
  • Rainbow
  • SRTPI
  • DME
Braid group
  • WalnutDSA
Supersingular elliptic curve isogeny
Satirical submission
Other
  • Guess Again
  • HK17
  • Mersenne-756839
  • RVB
  • Picnic

Round one submissions published attacks

  • Guess Again by Lorenz Panny [14]
  • RVB by Lorenz Panny[15]
  • RaCoSS by Daniel J. Bernstein, Andreas Hülsing, Tanja Lange and Lorenz Panny[16]
  • HK17 by Daniel J. Bernstein and Tanja Lange[17]
  • SRTPI by Bo-Yin Yang[18]
  • WalnutDSA
    • by Ward Beullens and Simon R. Blackburn[19]
    • by Matvei Kotov, Anton Menshov and Alexander Ushakov[20]
  • DRS by Yang Yu and Léo Ducas [21]
  • DAGS by Elise Barelli and Alain Couvreur[22]
  • Edon-K by Matthieu Lequesne and Jean-Pierre Tillich[23]
  • RLCE by Alain Couvreur, Matthieu Lequesne, and Jean-Pierre Tillich[24]
  • Hila5 by Daniel J. Bernstein, Leon Groot Bruinderink, Tanja Lange and Lorenz Panny[25]
  • Giophantus by Ward Beullens, Wouter Castryck and Frederik Vercauteren[26]
  • RankSign by Thomas Debris-Alazard and Jean-Pierre Tillich [27]
  • McNie by Philippe Gaborit;[28] Terry Shue Chien Lau and Chik How Tan [29]

Round two

Candidates moving on to the second round were announced on January 30, 2019. They are:[30]

Type PKE/KEM Signature
Lattice
Code-based
Hash-based
Multivariate
Supersingular elliptic curve isogeny
Zero-knowledge proofs

Round three

On July 22, 2020, NIST announced seven finalists ("first track"), as well as eight alternate algorithms ("second track"). The first track contains the algorithms which appear to have the most promise, and will be considered for standardization at the end of the third round. Algorithms in the second track could still become part of the standard, after the third round ends.[51] NIST expects some of the alternate candidates to be considered in a fourth round. NIST also suggests it may re-open the signature category for new schemes proposals in the future.[52]

Finalists

Type PKE/KEM Signature
Lattice[a]
Code-based
Multivariate

Alternate candidates

Type PKE/KEM Signature
Lattice
  • FrodoKEM
  • NTRU Prime
Code-based
  • BIKE
  • HQC
Hash-based
  • SPHINCS+
Multivariate
  • GeMSS
Supersingular elliptic curve isogeny
Zero-knowledge proofs
  • Picnic

Intellectual property concerns

After NIST's announcement regarding the finalists and the alternate candidates, various intellectual property concerns were voiced, notably surrounding lattice-based schemes such as Kyber and NewHope. NIST holds signed statements from submitting groups clearing any legal claims, but there is still a concern that third parties could raise claims. NIST claims that they will take such considerations into account while picking the winning algorithms.[53]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ NIST intends to standardize at most one of these lattice-based PKE/KEM schemes and at most one of these lattice-based signature schemes.[51]

References

  1. ^ "Post-Quantum Cryptography PQC".
  2. ^ "Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization – Post-Quantum Cryptography". Csrc.nist.gov. 3 January 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  3. ^ "The Future Is Now: Spreading the Word About Post-Quantum Cryptography".
  4. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-12-29. Retrieved 2017-12-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  5. ^ Hong, Zhu (2001). "Survey of Computational Assumptions Used inCryptography Broken or Not by Shor's Algorithm" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ^ "NIST Released NISTIR 8105, Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography". Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  7. ^ "NIST Asks Public to Help Future-Proof Electronic Information". Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  8. ^ Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory (3 January 2017). "Round 1 Submissions – Post-Quantum Cryptography – CSRC". Csrc.nist.gov. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  9. ^ a b c "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-12-29. Retrieved 2017-12-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ^ a b "Google Groups". Groups.google.com. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  11. ^ a b "ROLLO". Pqc-rollo.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  12. ^ RSA using 231 4096-bit primes for a total key size of 1 TiB. "Key almost fits on a hard drive" Bernstein, Daniel (2010-05-28). "McBits and Post-Quantum RSA" (PDF). Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  13. ^ Bernstein, Daniel; Heninger, Nadia (2017-04-19). "Post-quantum RSA" (PDF). Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  14. ^ "Dear all, the following Python script quickly recovers the message from a given "Guess Again" ciphertext without knowledge of the private key" (PDF). Csrc.nist.gov. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  15. ^ Panny, Lorenz (25 December 2017). "Fast key recovery attack against the "RVB" submission to #NISTPQC: t …. Computes private from public key". Twitter. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  16. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-12-26. Retrieved 2018-01-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  17. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2018-01-05. Retrieved 2018-01-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  18. ^ "Dear all, We have broken SRTPI under CPA and TPSig under KMA" (PDF). Csrc.nist.gov. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  19. ^ Beullens, Ward; Blackburn, Simon R. (2018). "Practical attacks against the Walnut digital signature scheme". Eprint.iacr.org.
  20. ^ Kotov, Matvei; Menshov, Anton; Ushakov, Alexander (2018). "AN ATTACK ON THE WALNUT DIGITAL SIGNATURE ALGORITHM". Eprint.iacr.org.
  21. ^ Yu, Yang; Ducas, Léo (2018). "Learning strikes again: the case of the DRS signature scheme". Eprint.iacr.org.
  22. ^ Barelli, Elise; Couvreur, Alain (2018). "An efficient structural attack on NIST submission DAGS". arXiv:1805.05429 [cs.CR].
  23. ^ Lequesne, Matthieu; Tillich, Jean-Pierre (2018). "Attack on the Edon-K Key Encapsulation Mechanism". arXiv:1802.06157 [cs.CR].
  24. ^ Couvreur, Alain; Lequesne, Matthieu; Tillich, Jean-Pierre (2018). "Recovering short secret keys of RLCE in polynomial time". arXiv:1805.11489 [cs.CR].
  25. ^ Bernstein, Daniel J.; Groot Bruinderink, Leon; Lange, Tanja; Lange, Lorenz (2017). "Hila5 Pindakaas: On the CCA security of lattice-based encryption with error correction". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  26. ^ "Official Comments" (PDF). Csrc.nist.gov. 13 September 2018.
  27. ^ Debris-Alazard, Thomas; Tillich, Jean-Pierre (2018). "Two attacks on rank metric code-based schemes: RankSign and an Identity-Based-Encryption scheme". arXiv:1804.02556 [cs.CR].
  28. ^ "I am afraid the parameters in this proposal have at most 4 to 6‐bits security under the Information Set Decoding (ISD) attack" (PDF). Csrc.nist.gov. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  29. ^ Lau, Terry Shue Chien; Tan, Chik How (31 January 2019). "Key Recovery Attack on McNie Based on Low Rank Parity Check Codes and Its Reparation". In Inomata, Atsuo; Yasuda, Kan (eds.). Advances in Information and Computer Security. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11049. Springer International Publishing. pp. 19–34. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97916-8_2. ISBN 978-3-319-97915-1.
  30. ^ Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory (3 January 2017). "Round 2 Submissions – Post-Quantum Cryptography – CSRC". Csrc.nist.gov. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  31. ^ a b Schwabe, Peter. "CRYSTALS". Pq-crystals.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  32. ^ "FrodoKEM". Frodokem.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  33. ^ Schwabe, Peter. "NewHope". Newhopecrypto.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  34. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2019-09-01. Retrieved 2019-01-30.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  35. ^ "SABER". Retrieved 17 June 2019.
  36. ^ "ThreeBears". SourceForge.net. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  37. ^ "Falcon". Falcon. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  38. ^ "qTESLA – Efficient and post-quantum secure lattice-based signature scheme". Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  39. ^ "BIKE – Bit Flipping Key Encapsulation". Bikesuite.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  40. ^ "HQC". Pqc-hqc.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  41. ^ "LEDAkem Key Encapsulation Module". Ledacrypt.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  42. ^ "LEDApkc Public Key Cryptosystem". Ledacrypt.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  43. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-12-29. Retrieved 2017-12-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  44. ^ "RQC". Pqc-rqc.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  45. ^ [1]
  46. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2019-01-31. Retrieved 2019-01-30.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  47. ^ "LUOV -- An MQ signature scheme". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  48. ^ "MQDSS post-quantum signature". Mqdss.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  49. ^ "SIKE – Supersingular Isogeny Key Encapsulation". Sike.org. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  50. ^ "Picnic. A Family of Post-Quantum Secure Digital Signature Algorithms". microsoft.github.io. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  51. ^ a b "Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process". Retrieved 2020-07-23.
  52. ^ Third PQC Standardization Conference - Session I Welcome/Candidate Updates, retrieved 2021-07-06
  53. ^ "Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria" (PDF).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NIST_Post-Quantum_Cryptography_Standardization&oldid=1032270558"