User talk:NatGertler: Difference between revisions
NatGertler (talk | contribs) |
Rupert1969 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:A person is capable of putting anything on their website, so we limit what can be cited to things that aren't self-serving -- i.e., there'd be no reason to lie about them. If my website says that I attended Palmyra High School, sure, we could use that in the article. But if it says that I am the legitimate king of Paris, no. Claiming that someone is "known for" something falls slightly into that latter category. More information on this guideline can be found at [[Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE]]. |
:A person is capable of putting anything on their website, so we limit what can be cited to things that aren't self-serving -- i.e., there'd be no reason to lie about them. If my website says that I attended Palmyra High School, sure, we could use that in the article. But if it says that I am the legitimate king of Paris, no. Claiming that someone is "known for" something falls slightly into that latter category. More information on this guideline can be found at [[Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE]]. |
||
:I hope that helps! --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler#top|talk]]) 14:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
:I hope that helps! --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler#top|talk]]) 14:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
Thanks, got it! |
|||
[[User:Rupert1969|Rupert1969]] ([[User talk:Rupert1969|talk]]) 14:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:59, 3 June 2021
This is NatGertler's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
hello
help me to edit with Flutter (comic series) please
- I am adding a pointless filler response here years later just so that this gets archived at some point. --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Stop reverting my edits.
You keep calling my edits opinions. What specifically is an opinion? Can you give an example. Stop abusing this website and reverting the hard work of other editors.
- You may want to start looking at Talk:David G. Stork. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Age and birth year in Lillian Randolph
Thank you for supporting my removal of the unsourced date of birth in Lillian Randolph. I appreciate your follow-up edit and the comments that you posted on the article's talk page. I don't understand why some editors seem to prefer unsourced dates and ages over what is found in reliable published sources. I'm glad that the changes caught your attention. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
ANI discussion
I have mentioned you at an ANI discussion I have started. Mo Billings (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
EU DisinfoLab - World News Network
In 2020, the EU DisinfoLab found that the World News Network was part of a disinformation campaign that helped Asian News International reproduce negative reports produced in Brussels and Geneva, that were pro-India and negative in iterations against Pakistan and China.[7]
The above sentence was included on both pages. "Big News Network" and "World News Network". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_News_Network and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_News_Network
Seems the sentence has been deleted from "Big news Network" page because they are not at fault.. so same should be the
These links don't talk about World News Network since it is a news aggregator collecting articles from many sources. https://www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/pakistan-demands-un-eu-investigate-fake-pro-india-ngos-media https://www.dawn.com/news/1594928
Skv282 (talk) 11:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- No, it looks like it was deleted from the Big News Network page because the person adding it did a lot of damage to the article when doing so. That it is not listed on those other articles does not mean that it is not in the EU report, nor that it is not relevant. Indeed, four pages of the 89 page report were devoted to WNN (and more for BNN.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Article
Hey NetGertler, I need your help with something. I’ve been trying to request edit to be removed on the Charles Martinet article, but my request keeps getting declined. Is there any chance you could help out of that’s ok? 97.33.66.176 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 97.33.66.176 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- They were right to turn it down. I can see no reason for the edit that you request. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
It’s ok, I understand. I’m very sorry if I wasted your time on this. I sincerely apologize. 97.33.65.199 (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Made | Nous
Hi! Thanks for the heads up on what a "minor edit" is ... I'll keep that in mind.
I don't quite understand the (polite) accusation of COI on the Made / Nous page--I don't work for Canada Media Fund, nor am I Mathieu Chantelois (as was suggested previously)! I think Made | Nous is doing some important work in terms of representation, diversity, etc. in Canadian film and television and thought they should have a better Wikipedia page. I had tried to add the logo, but it was rejected--any advice there? Thanks! Blipblip88 (talk) 00:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jackie Kannon
Hello, NatGertler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jackie Kannon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Editing biographical details for South Africa artist Peter Eastman
I am new to editing biographical information, can i not link the biographical information to the artists website Rupert1969 (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- A person is capable of putting anything on their website, so we limit what can be cited to things that aren't self-serving -- i.e., there'd be no reason to lie about them. If my website says that I attended Palmyra High School, sure, we could use that in the article. But if it says that I am the legitimate king of Paris, no. Claiming that someone is "known for" something falls slightly into that latter category. More information on this guideline can be found at Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE.
- I hope that helps! --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, got it! Rupert1969 (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)