Jump to content

Talk:Eve Online: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 41: Line 41:


The second reference in the 'Source code leak' subsection of the 'Development' section has a broken link. The now-correct link appears to be: [https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2011/2011-05-24-cpp-virtual-world-operations.markdown dmca/2011-05-24-cpp-virtual-world-operations.markdown at master · github/dmca · GitHub] [[Special:Contributions/84.216.204.180|84.216.204.180]] ([[User talk:84.216.204.180|talk]]) 22:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The second reference in the 'Source code leak' subsection of the 'Development' section has a broken link. The now-correct link appears to be: [https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2011/2011-05-24-cpp-virtual-world-operations.markdown dmca/2011-05-24-cpp-virtual-world-operations.markdown at master · github/dmca · GitHub] [[Special:Contributions/84.216.204.180|84.216.204.180]] ([[User talk:84.216.204.180|talk]]) 22:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

== is info box item "series" relevant or a mistake? ==

is info box item "series" relevant or a mistake?

Revision as of 09:57, 2 July 2019

Former good article nomineeEve Online was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 7, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 28, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
January 23, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

The second reference in the 'Source code leak' subsection of the 'Development' section has a broken link. The now-correct link appears to be: dmca/2011-05-24-cpp-virtual-world-operations.markdown at master · github/dmca · GitHub 84.216.204.180 (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

is info box item "series" relevant or a mistake?

is info box item "series" relevant or a mistake?