User talk:Msa1701: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:03, 26 July 2010

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Msa1701 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. raseaC^{talk to me} 21:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts disruptively. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca ^talk 09:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per my request i will agree to make NO edits for the next several months to prove that i am being serious about my request to be unblocked by Wiki administrators

Decline reason:

That's not how this usually works. If you're not going to edit there is no point in unblocking you anyway. Seeing as your last incidence of sockpuppetry was fairly recent, I think you should consider the standard offer for blocked users. If you can refrain from socking for several months, that would be a compelling reason to unblock you. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Regards

msa1701 (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 <div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''' from editing for {{#if:abusing multiple accounts disruptively|'''abusing multiple accounts disruptively'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}.  If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:~ <font color="#228b22">[[User:Mazca|'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a''']]</font> <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|talk]]</sup> 09:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)|~ <font color="#228b22">[[User:Mazca|'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a''']]</font> <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|talk]]</sup> 09:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->
-{{unblock|As per my request i will agree to make NO edits for the next several months to prove that i am being serious about my request to be unblocked by Wiki administrators}}.
+{{unblock reviewed|1=As per my request i will agree to make NO edits for the next several months to prove that i am being serious about my request to be unblocked by Wiki administrators|decline=That's not how this usually works. If you're not going to edit there is no point in unblocking you anyway. Seeing as your last incidence of sockpuppetry was fairly recent, I think you should consider the [[WP:OFFER|standard offer for blocked users]]. If you can refrain from socking for several months, ''that'' would be a compelling reason to unblock you. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 16:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)}}
 Regards