Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 places: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dream Focus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Delete''' for preference or (possibly) merge back to [[1632 series]]. If kept, it should be renamed to reflect the refernece to the novel series not the year 1632. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 17:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' for preference or (possibly) merge back to [[1632 series]]. If kept, it should be renamed to reflect the refernece to the novel series not the year 1632. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 17:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Kepp''' a list of locations is a perfectly reasonable article to have for a fictional universe, and the 1632 series is a multi-author shared universe with a lot of published titles. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.202.123|76.66.202.123]] ([[User talk:76.66.202.123|talk]]) 11:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Kepp''' a list of locations is a perfectly reasonable article to have for a fictional universe, and the 1632 series is a multi-author shared universe with a lot of published titles. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.202.123|76.66.202.123]] ([[User talk:76.66.202.123|talk]]) 11:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I agree with the above poster. There is nothing wrong with listing places in a notable fictional series. It is fairly crucial for understanding the plot. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 10:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:18, 3 August 2009
- 1632 places (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 institutions, this is a non-notable, pile of plots from an alternate universe. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to have sources from other notable people i suppose. Str8cash (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- All those sources are from the same universe of books and fan fiction. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Purely in-universe. Strangely, there does not appear to be a 1632 wiki at wikia to transwiki to. RayTalk 21:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- There is a Eric Flint wiki though. Already left a message for anybody there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Ricky. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 04:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 06:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete for preference or (possibly) merge back to 1632 series. If kept, it should be renamed to reflect the refernece to the novel series not the year 1632. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Kepp a list of locations is a perfectly reasonable article to have for a fictional universe, and the 1632 series is a multi-author shared universe with a lot of published titles. 76.66.202.123 (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the above poster. There is nothing wrong with listing places in a notable fictional series. It is fairly crucial for understanding the plot. Dream Focus 10:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)