Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Denman: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete |
→Frederick Denman: del |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' We have decided that non-medaling Olympians do not get default inclusion. The other sourcing is not enough to show a passing of GNG, and so we should delete this article.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 14:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' We have decided that non-medaling Olympians do not get default inclusion. The other sourcing is not enough to show a passing of GNG, and so we should delete this article.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 14:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete'''. I searched [[Newspapers.com]] expecting to find SIGCOV but found the coverage to be very thin. Nothing that would satisfy GNG. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 22:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Delete'''. I searched [[Newspapers.com]] expecting to find SIGCOV but found the coverage to be very thin. Nothing that would satisfy GNG. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 22:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' my searches were no more fruitful than those above. Denman existed, but nothing to approach GNG. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 22:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:13, 26 January 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frederick Denman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOLYMPICS ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Worth noting - a nomination (such as this one) based solely on an assertion that an article does not meet a non-gng criteria never reflects sufficient wp:before consideration. GNG is always enough. --2603:7000:2143:8500:30CD:F863:CA5C:68FC (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, finished #6 individual and team was #4 at the 1952 Olympics [1] which does not meet WP:NOLYMPIC. The only other info I could find about him is that he was an Army Lieutenant and 1952 was the last all-military pentathlon team the US sent [2] so I can't see how he meets WP:GNG either. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete We have decided that non-medaling Olympians do not get default inclusion. The other sourcing is not enough to show a passing of GNG, and so we should delete this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I searched Newspapers.com expecting to find SIGCOV but found the coverage to be very thin. Nothing that would satisfy GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete my searches were no more fruitful than those above. Denman existed, but nothing to approach GNG. Star Mississippi 22:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)