Jump to content

User:DenisNardin/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(47 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User sandbox}}
{{User sandbox}}
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
In [[algebraic topology]], a branch of [[mathematics]], a '''<math>G</math>-spectrum''' for a finite group <math>G</math> is an object representing an equivariant generalized cohomology theory. There are different models for <math>G</math>-spectra, but they all determine the same homotopy theory.
In [[algebraic topology]], a branch of [[mathematics]], a '''G-spectrum''' for a finite group G is an object representing an equivariant generalized cohomology theory. There are different models for G-spectra, but they all determine the same homotopy theory.

==Notation and conventions==
Throughout this article we will fix a finite group G. All G-representations will be assumed to be finite-dimensional orthogonal (that is equipped with a G-invariant scalar product). A '''G-space''' will be a space X together with a continous action of G. A pointed G-space is a G-space together with a distinguished basepoint that is fixed by the action of G.

If X,Y are two G-spaces we will denote by [X,Y]_G the equivalence classes of G-equivariant map under G-equivariant homotopy (that is two maps f,g:X\to Y are G-homotopic if and only if there is an homotopy between them such that the map X\times [0,1]\to Y is G-equivariant where G acts trivially on [0,1]). If X and Y are pointed both the maps and the homotopies are required to respect the basepoint.




==Orthogonal G-spectra==
==Orthogonal G-spectra==
There are various versions of orthogonal G-spectra. The version presented here is the one used in the solution of the Kervaire invariant one problem<ref>Hill, Hopkins, Ravenel 2016, Appendix A</ref>. Intuitively an orthogonal G-spectrum is a [[Continuous group action|G-space]] together with a collections of [[Loop space|deloopings]] indexed by the [[Group representation|representations]] of G.
The idea behind this definition is that a G-spectrum should be a G-space together with a collections of [[deloopings | Loop space]] indexed by the representations of G. This definition is presented in appendix A of Hill-Hopkins-Ravenel<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hill|first1=Micheal A.|last2=Hopkins|first2=Micheal J.|last3=Ravenel|first3=Douglas C.|title=On the nonexistence of elements of Kervaire invariant one|journal=Annals of Mathematics|date=2016|volume=184|issue=1|pages=1-262|doi=10.4007/annals.2016.184.1.1|url=http://annals.math.princeton.edu/2016/184-1/p01}}</ref>


Given two orthogonal G-representations V,W we let <math>Iso(V,W)</math> be the space of (not necessarily G-equivariant) isometries from V to W. This is a G-space with the natural conjugation action. There is a G-equivariant vector bundle <math>\xi(V,W)</math> over <math>Iso(V,W)</math> whose fiber over <math>i:V\to W</math> is the orthogonal complement of the image of i in W. There is a natural map of vector bundles <math>\xi(V,W)\times \xi(W,U)\to \xi(V,U)</math> lying above the composition map <math>Iso(V,W)\times Iso(W,U)\to Iso(V,U)</math>. This data allows us to construct a category J_G enriched in G-spaces, whose objects are G-representations whose mapping spaces are the [[Thom spaces|Thom space]] <math>Th(\xi(V,W))</math> of the vector bundle <math>\xi(V,W)\to Iso(V,W)</math>.
Given two orthogonal G-representations V,W we let <math>Iso(V,W)</math> be the space of (not necessarily G-equivariant) [[Isometry#Linear_isometry|isometric embeddings]] from V to W. This is a G-space with the natural conjugation action. There is a G-equivariant vector bundle <math>\xi(V,W)</math> over <math>Iso(V,W)</math> whose fiber over <math>i:V\hookrightarrow W</math> is the orthogonal complement of the image of i in W. There is a natural map of vector bundles <math>\xi(V,W)\times \xi(W,U)\to \xi(V,U)</math> lying above the composition map <math>Iso(V,W)\times Iso(W,U)\to Iso(V,U)</math>. This data allows us to construct a category <math>J_G</math> [[Enriched category|enriched]] in G-spaces, whose objects are G-representations and such that <math>Map_{J_G}(V,W)</math> is the [[Thom space|Thom spaces]] <math>Th(\xi(V,W))</math> of the vector bundle <math>\xi(V,W)\to Iso(V,W)</math>.


An orthogonal G-spectrum E is a functor <math>J_G\to Top^G</math> of categories enriched in G-spaces. Concretely it is the datum of
An orthogonal G-spectrum E is an enriched functor from <math>J_G</math> to pointed G-spaces. Concretely it is the datum of
* For every finite-dimensional orthogonal G-[[Group representation|representation]] V a pointed G-space E(V);
* For every finite-dimensional orthogonal G-[[Group representation|representation]] V a pointed G-space <math>E_V</math>;
* For every pair of G-representations V,W a G-equivariant map
* For every pair of G-representations V,W a G-equivariant map
:<math>\theta_{V,W}:Th(\xi(V,W))\wedge E(V)\to E(V')\,.</math>
:<math>Th(\xi(V,W))\wedge E_V\longrightarrow E_W\,.</math>
These maps are required to satisfy the obvious associativity and unitality constraints. The Thom space <math>Th(\xi(V,W))</math> should be thought of as the "union" of <math>S^{W-iV}</math> across all possible isometric embeddings i.
These maps are required to satisfy the obvious associativity and unitality constraints. The Thom space <math>Th(\xi(V,W))</math> should be thought of as the "union" of <math>S^{W-iV}</math> across all possible isometric embeddings i.

The category of orthogonal G-spectra has a natural [[Symmetric monoidal category|symmetric monoidal structure]] given by the [[Day convolution]] using the direct sum monoidal structure in the source and the [[smash product]] of pointed G-spaces in the target. This product is called the '''smash product of G-spectra'''.

==Homotopy groups==

In analogy with the homotopy groups of a spectrum, we can define for every integer n the '''n-th homotopy Mackey functor''' of a G-spectrum E. It is the [[Burnside category#Mackey functors|Mackey functor]] whose value on a G-set U is the [[colimit]]
:<math>\pi_k(E)(U) = \mathrm{colim}_{V\supseteq -k} [U_+\wedge S^{V+k},X_V]_G.</math>
where V runs through all H-representations equipped with a subrepresentation isomorphic to the direct sum of -k copies of the trivial representation (this condition is empty when k≥0) and V+k is either the direct sum of V with k copies of the trivial representation (if k≥0) or the orthogonal complement of the aforementioned subrepresentation. Specializing to the case of an orbit U=G/H we can define the '''H-equivariant k-th homotopy group''' of E as
:<math>\pi_k^H(E)=\pi_k(E)(G/H)=\mathrm{colim}_{V \supseteq -k} [S^{V+k},X_V]_H</math>

A ''stable equivalence'' of G-spectra is a map of G-spectra inducing an isomorphism on all homotopy Mackey functors. The [[Localization of a category|localization]] of the category of G-spectra at the stable equivalences is called the '''G-stable homotopy category'''.

There is also a variant of the homotopy groups using G-representations. For every [[Representation ring|virtual G-representation]] V the '''V-th homotopy group''' of a G-spectrum E is
:<math>\pi_V(E) = \mathrm{colim}_{W\supseteq -V} [S^{W\oplus V},E_W]_G\,.</math>
Care needs to be taken that, unlike the homotopy Mackey functors, the RO(G)-indexed homotopy groups in general do not detect stable equivalences (that is the analogue of the [[Whitehead theorem]] is false)<ref>{{cite web|last1=Noel|first1=Justin|url=http://mathoverflow.net/a/235251/|website=Mathoverflow|accessdate=7 June 2016|title=RO(G)-graded homotopy groups vs. Mackey functors}}</ref>. The RO(G)-graded group of <math>\pi_V(E)</math> for all representations is denoted <math>\pi_\star(E)</math>.

Similarly to the [[Spectrum_(topology)#Generalized homology and cohomology of spectra|nonequivariant case]] we can define for every spectrum E the corresponding homology and cohomology theory
:<math>E_*X=\pi_*(E\wedge X),\qquad E^*X=\pi_*F(X,E)\,.</math>

==Examples==
* For every pointed G-space X we can define its '''suspension spectrum''' as
:<math>(\Sigma^\infty X)(V) = S^V\wedge X</math>
In particular the suspension spectrum of the [[0-sphere|zero sphere]] with trivial action is called the '''sphere spectrum''' and denoted by <math>\mathbb{S}</math>, as in the [[Sphere spectrum|nonequivariant case]]. The suspension spectrum functor has a [[Adjoint functors|right adjoint]], denoted <math>\Omega^\infty</math> given by.
:<math>\mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^VE_V\,.</math>
* For every V=[V<sub>0</sub>-V<sub>1</sub>] [[representation ring|virtual representation]] of G, we can define a '''representation sphere''' <math>\mathbb{S}^V</math> as
:<math>\mathbb{S}^V(W) = \mathrm{colim}_U \Omega^{V_1\oplus U}S^{V_0\oplus U\oplus W}</math>
where we write S<sup>W</sup> to denote the [[Alexandroff extension|one-point compactification]] of the representation W.
* For every Mackey functor M there is a G-spectrum HM such that
:<math>\pi_iHM=\begin{cases} M &\textrm{ if }\ \ i=0\\ 0 &\textrm{otherwise}\end{cases}</math>
called the '''Eilenberg-MacLane''' G-spectrum of M. It represents [[equivariant cohomology]] with coefficients in M.
* There exists a C<sub>2</sub>-spectrum KR called '''real K-theory spectrum''' representing [[KR-theory]]. It satisfies a form of [[Bott periodicity]] given by <math>S^\rho\wedge KR \cong KR</math> where ρ is the [[regular representation]] of C<sub>2</sub>.
* Every orthogonal G-spectrum E has a canonical representation as
:<math>E=\mathrm{hocolim}_V \mathbb{S}^{-V}\wedge \Sigma^\infty E_V</math>

==G-spectra as infinite loop spaces==


For any G-spectrum E we can define the underlying space
For any G-spectrum E we can define the underlying space
:<math>\Omega^\infty E=\mathrm{hocolimit}_V \Omega^VE(V)</math>
:<math>\Omega^\infty E=\mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^VE(V)</math>
where the [[homotopy colimit]] is computed over the topological category of G-representations. More generally for every G-representation W we can write
where the [[homotopy colimit]] is computed over the topological category of G-representations. More generally for every G-representation W we can write
:<math>\Omega^{\infty-W} E = \mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^VE(V\oplus W)</math>
:<math>\Omega^{\infty-W} E = \mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^VE(V\oplus W)</math>
Line 28: Line 58:
Hence an orthogonal G-spectrum should be thought of as a G-space <math>\Omega^\infty E</math> together a family of deloopings for every G-representation (similarly to how a spectrum consists of a space together with a family of iterated deloopings).
Hence an orthogonal G-spectrum should be thought of as a G-space <math>\Omega^\infty E</math> together a family of deloopings for every G-representation (similarly to how a spectrum consists of a space together with a family of iterated deloopings).


==Fixed points==
For every subgroup H of G and every integer k we can define the '''H-equivariant k-th homotopy group of E''' as the [[colimit]]
:<math>\pi_k^H(E)=\mathrm{colim}_{V \supseteq -k} [S^{V+k},X_V]_H</math>
where V runs through all H-representations equipped with a subrepresentation isomorphic to the direct sum of -k copies of the trivial representation (this condition is empty when k≥0) and V+k is either the direct sum of V with k copies of the trivial representation (if k≥0) or the orthogonal complement of the aforementioned subrepresentation. A ''stable weak equivalence'' of G-spectra is a map of G-spectra inducing an isomorphism on all homotopy groups. The localization of the category of G-spectra is called the '''G-stable homotopy category'''.

==Lewis-May fixed points and geometric fixed points==


If E is an orthogonal G-spectrum, its Lewis-May fixed points are the spectrum E^G whose n-space is (E^G)_n = E(\mathbb{R}^n)^G and with the maps...
If E is an orthogonal G-spectrum, its Lewis-May fixed points are the spectrum E^G whose n-space is (E^G)_n = E(\mathbb{R}^n)^G and with the maps...
Line 42: Line 68:


Under this point of view a lot of the constructions we have described above are evident. For example if E is a spectral Mackey functor its Lewis-May fixed points <math>E^H</math> are simply the value of the spectral Mackey functor on the G-set G/H. The geometric fixed points instead are obtained as a [[left Kan extension]] ...
Under this point of view a lot of the constructions we have described above are evident. For example if E is a spectral Mackey functor its Lewis-May fixed points <math>E^H</math> are simply the value of the spectral Mackey functor on the G-set G/H. The geometric fixed points instead are obtained as a [[left Kan extension]] ...

==Smash product of G-spectra==


==The norm==
==The norm==
Let H be a subgroup of G. If E is an orthogonal H-spectrum we can define the norm as the G-spectrum
Let H be a subgroup of G. If E is an orthogonal H-spectrum we can define the norm as the G-spectrum
:<math>N^G_HE(V)=\mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^{\mathrm{ind}_H^GV} \Sigma^\infty N^G_H(X(V))</math>
:<math>N^G_HE(V)=\mathrm{hocolim}_V \Omega^{\mathrm{ind}_H^GV} \Sigma^\infty N^G_H(X(V))</math>

==Borel equivariant G-spectra==
Sometimes the name G-spectrum is used to mean a spectrum with an action of the group G. These objects form in fact a full subcategory of the category of G-spectra, corresponding to those E such that the map <math>E^H\to E^{hH}</math> is an equivalence for every subgroup H.

==Notes==
{{Reflist}}

==References==
*{{cite journal|last1=Hill|first1=Micheal A.|last2=Hopkins|first2=Micheal J.|last3=Ravenel|first3=Douglas C.|title=On the nonexistence of elements of Kervaire invariant one|journal=Annals of Mathematics|date=2016|volume=184|issue=1|pages=1-262|doi=10.4007/annals.2016.184.1.1|url=http://annals.math.princeton.edu/2016/184-1/p01}}
*{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=L. Gaunce|last2=May|first2=Peter|last3=Steinberger|first3=Mark|title=Equivariant Stable Homotopy Theory|date=1986|publisher=Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics}}

Latest revision as of 15:50, 21 June 2016

In algebraic topology, a branch of mathematics, a G-spectrum for a finite group G is an object representing an equivariant generalized cohomology theory. There are different models for G-spectra, but they all determine the same homotopy theory.


Orthogonal G-spectra

[edit]

There are various versions of orthogonal G-spectra. The version presented here is the one used in the solution of the Kervaire invariant one problem[1]. Intuitively an orthogonal G-spectrum is a G-space together with a collections of deloopings indexed by the representations of G.

Given two orthogonal G-representations V,W we let be the space of (not necessarily G-equivariant) isometric embeddings from V to W. This is a G-space with the natural conjugation action. There is a G-equivariant vector bundle over whose fiber over is the orthogonal complement of the image of i in W. There is a natural map of vector bundles lying above the composition map . This data allows us to construct a category enriched in G-spaces, whose objects are G-representations and such that is the Thom spaces of the vector bundle .

An orthogonal G-spectrum E is an enriched functor from to pointed G-spaces. Concretely it is the datum of

  • For every finite-dimensional orthogonal G-representation V a pointed G-space ;
  • For every pair of G-representations V,W a G-equivariant map

These maps are required to satisfy the obvious associativity and unitality constraints. The Thom space should be thought of as the "union" of across all possible isometric embeddings i.

The category of orthogonal G-spectra has a natural symmetric monoidal structure given by the Day convolution using the direct sum monoidal structure in the source and the smash product of pointed G-spaces in the target. This product is called the smash product of G-spectra.

Homotopy groups

[edit]

In analogy with the homotopy groups of a spectrum, we can define for every integer n the n-th homotopy Mackey functor of a G-spectrum E. It is the Mackey functor whose value on a G-set U is the colimit

where V runs through all H-representations equipped with a subrepresentation isomorphic to the direct sum of -k copies of the trivial representation (this condition is empty when k≥0) and V+k is either the direct sum of V with k copies of the trivial representation (if k≥0) or the orthogonal complement of the aforementioned subrepresentation. Specializing to the case of an orbit U=G/H we can define the H-equivariant k-th homotopy group of E as

A stable equivalence of G-spectra is a map of G-spectra inducing an isomorphism on all homotopy Mackey functors. The localization of the category of G-spectra at the stable equivalences is called the G-stable homotopy category.

There is also a variant of the homotopy groups using G-representations. For every virtual G-representation V the V-th homotopy group of a G-spectrum E is

Care needs to be taken that, unlike the homotopy Mackey functors, the RO(G)-indexed homotopy groups in general do not detect stable equivalences (that is the analogue of the Whitehead theorem is false)[2]. The RO(G)-graded group of for all representations is denoted .

Similarly to the nonequivariant case we can define for every spectrum E the corresponding homology and cohomology theory

Examples

[edit]
  • For every pointed G-space X we can define its suspension spectrum as

In particular the suspension spectrum of the zero sphere with trivial action is called the sphere spectrum and denoted by , as in the nonequivariant case. The suspension spectrum functor has a right adjoint, denoted given by.

  • For every V=[V0-V1] virtual representation of G, we can define a representation sphere as

where we write SW to denote the one-point compactification of the representation W.

  • For every Mackey functor M there is a G-spectrum HM such that

called the Eilenberg-MacLane G-spectrum of M. It represents equivariant cohomology with coefficients in M.

  • There exists a C2-spectrum KR called real K-theory spectrum representing KR-theory. It satisfies a form of Bott periodicity given by where ρ is the regular representation of C2.
  • Every orthogonal G-spectrum E has a canonical representation as

G-spectra as infinite loop spaces

[edit]

For any G-spectrum E we can define the underlying space

where the homotopy colimit is computed over the topological category of G-representations. More generally for every G-representation W we can write

so that

Hence an orthogonal G-spectrum should be thought of as a G-space together a family of deloopings for every G-representation (similarly to how a spectrum consists of a space together with a family of iterated deloopings).

Fixed points

[edit]

If E is an orthogonal G-spectrum, its Lewis-May fixed points are the spectrum E^G whose n-space is (E^G)_n = E(\mathbb{R}^n)^G and with the maps...

G-spectra as spectral Mackey functors

[edit]

An important observation is that the suspension spectra of finite G-sets span a subcategory of the G-equivariant stable homotopy category which is equivalent to the Burnside category. So the homotopy groups of a G-spectrum can be assemble to for an homotopy Mackey functor. In fact this is true even if we consider the topological subcategory provided we

Theorem (Guillou-May, Schwede-Shipley): The category of orthogonal G-spectra is equivalent to the category of additive topological functors from the Burnside category to spectra.

Under this point of view a lot of the constructions we have described above are evident. For example if E is a spectral Mackey functor its Lewis-May fixed points are simply the value of the spectral Mackey functor on the G-set G/H. The geometric fixed points instead are obtained as a left Kan extension ...

The norm

[edit]

Let H be a subgroup of G. If E is an orthogonal H-spectrum we can define the norm as the G-spectrum

Borel equivariant G-spectra

[edit]

Sometimes the name G-spectrum is used to mean a spectrum with an action of the group G. These objects form in fact a full subcategory of the category of G-spectra, corresponding to those E such that the map is an equivalence for every subgroup H.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Hill, Hopkins, Ravenel 2016, Appendix A
  2. ^ Noel, Justin. "RO(G)-graded homotopy groups vs. Mackey functors". Mathoverflow. Retrieved 7 June 2016.

References

[edit]