Talk:Soap opera: Difference between revisions
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rv 2022 tes edit |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=B}} |
|||
{{Old peer review|archive=1}} |
{{Old peer review|archive=1}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes| |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Television|importance=high}} |
||
{{WikiProject Soap Operas}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|USTV=yes|USTV-importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Annual readership}} |
{{Annual readership}} |
||
{{archives}} |
{{archives}} |
||
== |
== Unsourced == |
||
How is this a B-class article? Many sections contain no references at all. We have assertions for various series' popularity without citing any ratings. We mention regional differences in the genre and its formats, without citing any reliable sources. This seems to be original research, and likely reflects the POV of Wikipedia's editors. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 05:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
== Longest opera is not Guiding Light anymore == |
|||
I have just modified 3 external links on [[Soap opera]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=783771742 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100123212146/http://www.soapoperadigest.com/soapstarstats/susanseaforthhayesbio/ to http://www.soapoperadigest.com/soapstarstats/susanseaforthhayesbio/ |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160812112840/http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/daytime-emmy-nominations-young-and-the-restless-tv-pop-1201738398/ to http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/daytime-emmy-nominations-young-and-the-restless-tv-pop-1201738398/ |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120707002638/http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/news/3265 to http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/news/3265 |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA%2FMGArticle%2FLNA_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1149189641462&path=%21burg |
|||
Assuming ''The Archers'' is still going, in 2022 they surpassed ''Guiding Light'' in runtime length. (72 years) [[User:Curuwen|Curuwen]] ([[User talk:Curuwen|talk]]) 23:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
== Not all dictionaries say that for something to be properly called a "soap opera", it has to be long-running, according to how the term is commonly understood. == |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
I happen to have the second edition of the '''<u>Oxford English dictionary</u>, which is considered an English-language authority by some.''' It doesn't say that for something to be correctly labelled as a "soap opera", it has be long-running. |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC) |
|||
I do know that many English-language dictionaries are descriptivist, but I think that this Wikipedia article should at least mention this nuance, as per its Neutral Point of View policy. |
|||
[https://www.google.com/search?q=soap+opera+def| Google Dictionary] |
|||
== Move discussion in progress == |
|||
[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/soap%20opera| Meriam Wesbster] |
|||
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Drama serial#Requested move 9 April 2019 |Talk:Drama serial]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Drama serial crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 22:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
[https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/soap-opera| Collins Dictionary] |
|||
[https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/soap-opera| Oxford Learners Dictionary] |
|||
[https://www.dictionary.com/browse/soap%20opera| Dictionary.com] |
|||
In all the billingual English-Portuguese dictionaries in which I looked that up, the translation given for the term "soap opera" is ''"telenovela"'' or simply ''"novela"''. That is true even for some billingual dictionaries which I consider high-quality such as the Cambridge English-Portuguese Dictionary. [[User:Semantism2|Semantism2]] ([[User talk:Semantism2|talk]]) 22:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:06, 21 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soap opera article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Soap opera received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Unsourced
[edit]How is this a B-class article? Many sections contain no references at all. We have assertions for various series' popularity without citing any ratings. We mention regional differences in the genre and its formats, without citing any reliable sources. This seems to be original research, and likely reflects the POV of Wikipedia's editors. Dimadick (talk) 05:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Longest opera is not Guiding Light anymore
[edit]Assuming The Archers is still going, in 2022 they surpassed Guiding Light in runtime length. (72 years) Curuwen (talk) 23:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Not all dictionaries say that for something to be properly called a "soap opera", it has to be long-running, according to how the term is commonly understood.
[edit]I happen to have the second edition of the Oxford English dictionary, which is considered an English-language authority by some. It doesn't say that for something to be correctly labelled as a "soap opera", it has be long-running. I do know that many English-language dictionaries are descriptivist, but I think that this Wikipedia article should at least mention this nuance, as per its Neutral Point of View policy.
In all the billingual English-Portuguese dictionaries in which I looked that up, the translation given for the term "soap opera" is "telenovela" or simply "novela". That is true even for some billingual dictionaries which I consider high-quality such as the Cambridge English-Portuguese Dictionary. Semantism2 (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class television articles
- High-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class soap opera articles
- WikiProject Soap Operas articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American television articles
- Mid-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles