User talk:Ts12rAc/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Rawattanuj12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bulgaria national cricket team. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 11:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ts12rAc/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ts12rAc/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ts12rAc/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Sunrisers 2020 season

Hi. I thank for your recent edits but it would be great if you don't simply change everything that's present in the page. I am maintaining Sunrisers page since many seasons and all the pages are following a particular format. Thanks. SaGa (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

You are always welcome to edit the page as long as the format is maintained. SaGa (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ts12rAc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please unblock me, please go through my contributions. Someone (Doug Weller) blocked a range of ip's (2409:4052::/32) and i'm blocked for nothing. I'm fairly editing wikipedia, i'm only editing cricket related articles. Please have a look on my request. Hope my block will soon lift. Ts12rAc (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I have given you a 10 day IP block exemption so you can resume editing. If you have need of a longer term exemption, you will need to follow the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY. 331dot (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

July 2021 - Anton Janša

Just in case my record card: user scan vitosmo

A little on the background: Theres been a pretty successful drive here, called Eastern and Central Europe spring 2021 drive to cross-pollinate, i.e. to translate pages from PL to SI and vice versa. Heres my contributions. Looking at the irrelevance of some of the subjects elsewhere and realizing this must be pretty much the same with us at si.wikipedia.org, I decided to start methodically on slovenian subjects in EN and DE wikipedias.

I have as yet no right to do automatic translation from my mother language (Slovenian) to English, so I intended to do it step by step for the missing 100 edits. I agree my changes "are missing references" - but they would follow later, when the update is done (see janša article in slovenian). Note Anton Janša a) is Slovenian and b) given the sorry state of bees around the globe deserves a better (and more complete) exposure. So do other persons and subjects on my list. If you give me a hint or two how to avoid any snags and/or signs of trlling behaviour, I will apreciate. So... what about Janša? TiA Vitosmo (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

My Clarification

It wasn't , I just noticed that the Lists fit in the references page while the actual list is empty . Why did the list became empty anyway and that there is only a pitcure of Harihal Gandhi on the list of converts to Hinduism . Please put the Lists of converts to Hinduism from Islam in the right page ! Do not place it in the References page as it is only for The references of sites for those converts to Hinduism , not for the list all in all ! Bayu Fuller (talk) 03:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

Hello Ts12rAc. Thanks for the information that you left on my talk page.

Kittens

Sorry

Yo17h2 (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Garrison band page updates

Hi- I made edits to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrison_(band) page last night (I am one of the previous members of the band), and it looks like you reversed all of them. Can you please undo that? We are working on updating the wiki entry- I'm not sure why you undid all of the text updates and link updates I made. Thanks!

Browning

Hi,

  Full disclosure, I'm the author of The Guns of John Moses Browning, the new book, and I'm brand new to editing a Wikipedia entry.

   I see some "reverts" were made to corrections I made the other day, as when I corrected the age he made his first gun, it was age 10, not 13. It was changed back to 13. That may be what Britannica says, but its wrong. What should I do?

 There are other errors in the article, as in calling the slide action Browning invented a "telescoping bolt." That's not what he invented when he invented the pistol slide. His mechanism does not have a telescoping bolt. Or when it says that Browning produced "other non-military firearms" in his original shop in Ogden. He did not. 

 In sum, there are a variety of errors. I can correct them or not. Is there a way to make these corrections without having to go thru multiple back and forths? The sources for my book are the family's own archives - which no one else has ever seen, tho now they are donated to Weber State, and other previously unknown documents, all thoroughly footnoted in my book.

  Thanks for any advice

  Nathan GorensteinJoe Midatlantic (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Joe Midatlantic (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Ts12rAc. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! - TheresNoTime ^😺 12:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hi , I need some help , thank you . Hamaredha (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Hamaredha: Hi, what type of help you want?--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 14:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Bala Ram Moodh

Contest this Mukesh.kfc (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Notice about a article of Bangladeshi umpire

Hello, i have notice you recently suggested to delete one of my created article about a Bangladeshi umpire, can you please explain why it should be delete? Frryan404 (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Frryan404: As WP:NCRIC states Umpires are presumed notable if they've been a member of the Elite Panel of ICC Umpires or played as a player in highest level of cricket.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 16:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Notice about Bangladeshi umpire

Check ESPN info before suggestion to delete. Thank you. Frryan404 (talk) 16:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Explain about speedy deletion

Hi. I have a problem that you claimed my page "Martin Eesmaa" on English Wikipedia, you claimed about speedy deletion. I don't understand, why is speedy deletion on my page? I just wanna save and leave there page online, and please don't touch my page. I know, back a few months ago, same I got speedy deletion about page "Wondershare Video Editor". If you would like to reply me, please talk to MartinHero13. - MartinHero13 — Preceding undated comment added 12:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@MartinHero13:, I nominated your article for speedy deletion for following reasons:-

• Your article seems to self promotion and does not meet our notability guidelines.
• Still you can cite your article with independent reliable sources to prove it's notability.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 13:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Publishing the Article

This article has been verified and agrees to all the terms and conditions. Please public the article after you look and accept the content used. Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mohammed Adnan Shariff: Please cite your article with independent reliable source to show it's notability.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

you can check the official website of Ghousia college and the founder's page and also the Wikipedia page about the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghousia_College_of_Engineering Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

All the information quoted is true and verified by his Grandson Mohammed Adnan Shariff. I truly verify and state all the statement correct and acceptable. Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Reliable sources links also to be provided here, http://www.ghousiaedu.org/founder.htm

and the information is verified by Wikipedia itself using the official Wikipedia website and the article of Ghousia college of engineering. The only information to be updated is about the founder. Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mohammed Adnan Shariff: As WP:OR states that Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. http://www.ghousiaedu.org/founder.htm this is a primary source. Genrally we need independent secondary sources to verify given informations.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

The primary source is the original source for this article, Please mention why type of Independent tertiery source your demanding of? Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

This is a genuine and true article with all the correct sources provided. Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mohammed Adnan Shariff: please see WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

what kind of supporting documents do you want me to provide as everything is open and clear. There's an interview registered under form 14 during the conversation with the Founder at Bangalore, I could provide whatsoever possible to public this article, please help me in publishing as he has done very exemplary works thousands of young men and women. Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mohammed Adnan Shariff: In simple words you need some news websites link where he got interviewed or he got wide coverage in the media.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 18:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Is the college official website and founder's section message not enough to prove it?

how are the other ways to be provided? Link for college official website and videos Mohammed Adnan Shariff (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hart-Parr

Is there a way to just move the section from the Oliver Page over to the Hart-Parr page? Thats what i'm trying to do. Then add more info later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChiserYT (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Pranav.S.S

Hello, Ts12rAc,

For some reason, I don't know why, you are moving articles to Draft space, without leaving a redirect and then creating a page and tagging it for deletion, CSD R2. If you aren't leaving a redirect, you don't need to create a page that will then be deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Liz, I'm using this script as currently I have not accesse to supressredirect tool locally. I moving articles to draftspace as they are not ready for mainspace.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 06:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Liz Ts12rAc is a global Rollbacker so they have Suppress redirect right by default in all wikimedia wikis. According to English Wikipedia global right policies global Rollbackers are not allowed to use the suppress redirect here unless when combating vandalism. Cheers --Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 10:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Well, I don't understand. Look at this log entry here...you moved the page without leaving a redirect. Then created the page, stating that it should be deleted as a cross-namespace redirect. You can't see that page edit because you are not the admin and can't see deleted edits but the only edit to this entire page is you creating the page, asking for it to be deleted. It makes no sense to create a page to ask for its deletion. Don't create the page and it won't need to be deleted!

I will leave these cases and hopefully, an admin won't delete them before you have seen them. Look at Noorpora and its page history, see the only edit to the page is your request to delete the page. Otherwise, there was no content on the page. Same with Rajasthan Urdu Academy. Maybe there is a problem with the script you are using, do you know, Ts12rAc or Synoman Barris? But I use User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js, too. I've been doing this a few years and I've never run into this situation before. Of course, an admin can delete the pages when they are tagged but it is just unnecessary work if you are suppressing the redirect, to then create the page again. The problem in this case isn't suppressing the redirect but creating and then tagging the page. Make sense? No? Well, it doesn't to me either. ;-) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I've brought up the situation with the script-maker at User talk:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js#Weird problem with the script so maybe they can help. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Liz for raising the issue at the talk page, I hope the script maintainer may be able to offer some insight into this issue. Ts I think a parmanent solution would be to request Extended mover locally if you often do this work to avoid being somehow in breach of WP:GRP . Cheers --Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 20:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Look at the page history of Dhadkan zindagi ki and Marie Weyher. You made the only edit to the page, to tag it for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: still i'm using the same script to draftify articles. Don't know what going wrong.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 07:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

India Bible College & Seminary, Kumbanad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, India Bible College & Seminary, Kumbanad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Akobir Turaev

The article Akobir Turaev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ts12rAc,

You received this message as Twinkle sees you as the page creator as, when you move a page to Draft space (as discussed above), you are making an edit to the page. Obviously, you are not the article creator though. Just thought I'd explain why you were receiving this notice. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

help

Can plz help me ehat happen to my page AK ONLINE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK_Online — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhmdAsjad (talk • contribs) 08:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@AhmdAsjad: i nominated your article for speedy deletion because you does not provide any reliable sources so its content can be verified. And don't forget to sign you message by putting four tildes(~~ ~~) in the end of message.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 08:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you could you plz check now (~~ Ahmed ~~) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhmdAsjad (talk • contribs) 08:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Reason why you deleted article

Why did you delete the article of 'THE RAINBOW OF DISCRIMINATORY IDENTITIES'? I didn't mention the price,discount or offers and no promoting words like 'BUY NOW/IN STOCK/HURRY,ONLY FEW LEFT'.I didn't give reviews of the book also.I did not mention the shopping app or market to buy the book.I did not make the readers to feel it as 'best book' or 'No.1 book'.Thus,I did not advertise in any manner.There are other articles in wikipedia posted by somebody else about another books using the same type of information that I provided and that is not deleted.Why are you discouraging me from creating article which is based on true and correct facts?You can get the information about the book on internet also. Waxstone (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

@Waxstone: I didn't delete your page (only admins can) although I nominated your article for deletion. Your article doesn't seem to fulfill our WP:NBOOK policy and it's written like WP:PROMO. Wikipedia does not accept facts (WP:OR) that's not supported by reliable sources. Your edits pattern shows you have WP:COI. Still, you can create articles in draft space so you can work on with minimal disturbance and when ready submit it for review and feedback.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 16:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haji Palay Khan Mandokhail

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haji Palay Khan Mandokhail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ts12rAc,

A redirect you created was turned into an article so when I tagged it for deletion, Twinkle saw you as the page creator even though you had moved the page to Draft space. Just explaining why you received this notification. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Me

You should stop. Cleaner67 (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

DP Bakshi

Hello! I wanted to let you know that I declined your A7 speedy deletion nomination of DP Bakshi, under the rationale that the credible claim of being a senior official of a notable political party is enough to indicate enough significance to avoid speedy deletion. However, it is possible that the article's subject does not meet notability thresholds for inclusion, and you are welcome to attempt deletion through another channel, such as WP:PROD or WP:AFD.--Slon02 (talk) 19:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

The Lost King - Draft

Hi there! The Lost King is an upcoming film so I can't add in reviews or box office figures as it is due to be released later this year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.130.138 (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@83.244.130.138:Well, ok then i removed my comment. But most of your cited references showing errors. When i googled them, i coudn't find them, could you correct those links. Beside this still need significant coverage in reliable sources. SEE WP:NFF.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Request on 05:03:24, 16 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Rakesh.dsouza

• Rakesh.dsouza (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:NEXT Web Series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Friend, I am new here and just added my first Wikipedia article for a company, as per your review and comment, I have added the Reception section, is that ok and can be accepted to be live after I submit it again for review... Need help here to review my draft and to post my new page live... Draft link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NEXT_Web_Series thanks Rakesh.dsouza (talk) 05:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@Rakesh.dsouza: this is english wikipedia so content needs to be written in english. The reception section needs to be translated in english. Also, only review by a reliable sources are acceptable.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sdrqaz. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Bikroo Kanpur Gangster, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sdrqaz (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Comparison of number bases

Draft:Comparison of number bases, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Comparison of number bases and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Comparison of number bases during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:3162:853D:E27:61C2 (talk) 22:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Discussion of decline: Draft article

Hello, reviewer

One article was decline by you, you left the reasons also, I agree with your decision I am not satisfied with the reasons. Can You help me to describe some weakness which was not include in my talk page. thanks for readings. Endrabcwizart (talk) 04:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

@Endrabcwizart: I think my fellow reviewers already addressed your concern in Draft talk:Sushma Adhikari.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 10:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

But this time I improve it. All the source are reliable according to User:Usedtobecool/PSN Endrabcwizart (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Comment at my Draft

Hello, and thank you for checking the draft I created - Draft:Naveen Kumar (kabaddi). This is actually my first article for creation. Could you tell me the problems with the PEACOCK and NPOV terms? Thanks in advance. Kpddg ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your decline advise on Wikipedia Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty

Hello, Ts12rAc, Greetings! I am writing concerning your rejection of my review of the draft page for Shubhra_Mohanty. Please forgive my persistence, but I have read up the WP:GNG, and I truly have reason to believe that I have respected the rules to be neutral and to add independent, notable, reputable references to show the verifiability and notability of the subject. The several references in the article presently shows significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (quoting from your comment).

• As many as 4 verifiable live references from The_Economic_Times, Business_Standard, Outlook_(Indian_magazine) and Zee Business (operated by Zee_Media_Corporation#Current_channels) (All of which India's leading and very respectable print/online news agencies). These are all "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" in line with WP:GNG
• As many as 2 verifiable live references from Tofler India (see https://www.tofler.in/about) and Outstanding Speakers Bureau (see Raheel_Khursheed) (also see https://outstandingspeakersbureau.in/). These are all "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" in line with WP:GNG. Both of these sources are heavily cited in several articles in Wikipedia.
• As many as 4 verifiable live references from "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject", in line with WP:GNG, viz., Mid-Day, DNA News Agency, Yahoo News.

Can you please let me know the exact places in the page where I do not conform to the rules? Just need to understand.

Moreover, with deep humbleness, I would like to cite some examples: The following articles are either supported by similar, fewer in number, or comparitively ill-referenced than Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty Article - that you have declined. Please help me understand, if Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty doesn't deserve a place in Wikipedia, how can articles like the following deserve to have a place in the Wikipedia?

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attin_Bhalla
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annelies_Strba
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filip_Antonijevi%C4%87
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basanta_Choudhury
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Milosavljevi%C4%87_(footballer,_born_2000)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raheel_Khursheed
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Baswani
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Abraham_Cheulkar
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Bhatt
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anand_Babu
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibhas_Chakraborty
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._P._Chandrababu
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Webster-Cyriaque
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_J%C3%B8nsson

I can cite a several more examples, but I am sure I have been able to express my point.

NOTE: I have nothing personal against the above-mentioned articles. I am just saying - if these can be, why not Shubhra Mohanty? Would appreciate an early response and suitable action.

User_talk:Wadlin13 (talk)Wadlin13 (talk)

declining of draft

hi...i've seen that my request for article creation Draft:The Fame Game (TV Series) has been declined and the reason was mentioned as 'copied and pasted from somewhere else.... I clearly tell you that i have written this using my own words and provided genuine sources. and even all articles based on movies and tv shows are to be written in the same manner right?.

please check the netflix link given in the table for more details...thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adithya003 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 

Hi...I've attached the sources of the reception of this work and have added a paragraph regarding the same....request you have to have a look at them... thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adithya003 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Appreciation CAJaganaddamRJY (talk) 03:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your decline advise on Wikipedia Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty

Hello, :@Ts12rAc, Respectful greetings! I am writing concerning your rejection of my review of the draft page for Shubhra_Mohanty. Please forgive my persistence, but I have read up the WP:GNG, and I truly have reason to believe that I have respected the rules to be neutral and to add independent, notable, reputable references to show the verifiability and notability of the subject. The several references in the article presently shows significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (quoting from your comment).

• As many as 4 verifiable live references from The_Economic_Times, Business_Standard, Outlook_(Indian_magazine) and Zee Business (operated by Zee_Media_Corporation#Current_channels) (All of which India's leading and very respectable print/online news agencies). In line with WP:GNG, these are indeed "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
• As many as 2 verifiable live references from Tofler India (see https://www.tofler.in/about) and Outstanding Speakers Bureau (see Raheel_Khursheed) (also see https://outstandingspeakersbureau.in/). In line with WP:GNG, these are indeed "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Both of these sources are heavily referenced in several other articles in Wikipedia.
• As many as 4 verifiable live references from "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject", in line with WP:GNG, viz., Mid-Day, Daily News & Analysis (DNA) - run by Zee_News, Yahoo!_News.

Can you please let me know the exact places in the page where I do not conform to the rules? Just need to understand.

Moreover, with deep humbleness, I would like to cite some examples: The following articles are either supported by similar, fewer in number, or comparitively ill-referenced than Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty Article - that you have declined. Please help me understand, if Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty doesn't deserve a place in Wikipedia, how can articles like the following deserve to have a place in the Wikipedia?

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attin_Bhalla
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annelies_Strba
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filip_Antonijevi%C4%87
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basanta_Choudhury
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Milosavljevi%C4%87_(footballer,_born_2000)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raheel_Khursheed
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Baswani
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Abraham_Cheulkar
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Bhatt
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anand_Babu
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibhas_Chakraborty
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._P._Chandrababu
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Webster-Cyriaque
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_J%C3%B8nsson

I can cite a several more examples, but I am sure I have been able to express my point.

NOTE: I have nothing personal against these above-mentioned articles. I am just saying - if these can be published part of Wikipedia, why not Shubhra Mohanty? Would appreciate an early response and suitable action. --Wadlin13 (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty has been resubmitted for your kind review and approval

Hello, :@Ts12rAc, Respectful greetings! Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty has been duly edited and resubmitted for your kind review and approval. --Wadlin13 (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Resubmission: Exceptional Families of the Military

Hello, we have resubmitted the draft page for Exceptional Families of the Military without using specific language from the organization's website. Looking forward to second review!

Amgrover (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)amgroverAmgrover (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Aashiqui Draft

Recently you have leave a comment for me about reviews or reception. So this is a Bhojpuri Language Film, there are no box office records or analysis. So Please Move This Page in Mainspace. Thank You Pk41946 (talk) 04:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Damodar_G._Naik

I see that you have suggested that this is a copyvio. However, the elements that are copied are small quotations. With citations these are allowed. Accordingly I am reverting your review, and calling for citations instead. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Hindu_Rao_Hospital

What an astonishingly ANNOYING user you are. I put in the effort to create an article about a topic which is clearly notable as can be seen by a simple google search. Once the article stub is created, others can take the ahead in the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. If you don't have anything constructive to add then STAY AWAY from the page and let others add their inputs. Don't be a meddling busybody!

Pranab (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Need some help

Please tell me what's wrong in this article? 27.147.179.225 (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

About Draft

Hello Ts12rAc, Please re-check Draft: Shanaleshwara Swayambhu Temple is now suitable for Wikipedia? (Additional references are included) (ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC))

Article about take diversion flim

The film is not released yet will add reviews later after the flim releas. Guhan1308 (talk) 02:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kanmani_Pappa this movie is waiting to release plz movie to permanent pageAhmdAsjad (talk) 06:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Lovepanti

Iske AFC me help kar dijiye Rk12345678 (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Request on 12:51:35, 15 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by ComputingTeacher

• ComputingTeacher (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Freya Thakral (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

Looking at the person of notability guidelines about winning awards. Does winning the Diana Award and The British Citizen Award not count as notable awards? Also regarding reliable sources, does the Times Of India and the Diana Award and British Citizen Award website not count as those?

Happy to link multiple sources that repeat similar information about the person if that is required. Similar persons of note who have won the Diana Award have previously been recognised on Wikipedia and their pages are then been updated by the community.

Would you be able to shed some light on what exactly is required? That would be helpful in updating the page.

Thank you.

ComputingTeacher (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli

Hello,

I see you turned down this draft article and told the editor to work on St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli. But that article is a cut & paste version of this draft which has existed for months, while the main space article is only a day old. Have you compared the two versions? Is the draft superior to the main space version? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Varun Pradip Dave

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Varun Pradip Dave, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 17:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Rajababu (2006 film)

The film has several independent, secondary reviews, so wondering why the draft was rejected. DareshMohan (talk) 06:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Request for evaluation of Draft:Narahari Sarkar

Hey, Ts12rAc, the Draft:Narahari Sarkar was submitted by me for evaluation. 34 days have elapsed. It hasn't been approved yet. Can you please help me? Thanks,Satnam2408 (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from koqkpa

Why did you decline my article, I'm in India and it's it's of soumita Mondal. Koqkpa (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Nirmal Pathak Ki Ghar Wapsi

Hello, Ts12rAc, Can you review and patroll this new page Nirmal Pathak Ki Ghar Wapsi? Thanks--PQR01 (talk) 11:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Request to review Yuvraj Singh Sandhu's Wikipedia page

Hi, Hope you are well?

Could you please review the Wikipedia page for Indian professional golfer Yuvraj Singh Sandhu?

I have redone it with sources. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best wishes Aman 1.23.160.16 (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Lucknow Super Giants

Draft:Lucknow Super Giants, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lucknow Super Giants and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lucknow Super Giants during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spike 'em (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thea

info about Thea is absolutely inaccurate and Infundamental and distorts and misinforms about real Ancient Greek mythology. you should review 148.69.198.224 (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

ok, first you need to stop removing contents. You can alter info by providing a suitable, reliable source. Or you can discuss your concerns over the article's talk page.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 10:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Ts12rAc. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Mifter (talk) 04:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Boogeyman (2012 film)

Hello, Ts12rAc,

Somehow, you moved this page without leaving a redirect. But then created a page which you tagged for deletion. Do you have advanced privileges on any other project that might have caused this? Because if you don't leave a redirect, there is no need to create a page only to delete it. I've seen this happen with one other editor who had advanced global privileges that seemed to counteract their editing on the English Wikipedia. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Liz: We discussed it here. At that time, I stopped moving articles into draftspace to prevent problems. Recently I began new page patrolling and have to move inappropriate articles into the draft space. But I think I need to stop this because I can't explain it all to everyone.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 07:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Ts12rAc,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Concern regarding Draft:India Bible College & Seminary, Kumbanad 2

Hello, Ts12rAc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:India Bible College & Seminary, Kumbanad 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

@FireflyBot yes TH.KUNDAN (talk) 02:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

बनवाली (banwali)

It was an old Muslim village.There are two old mosques in this village. In 1947 all the Muslim family went to Pakistan.Two Waner and a Deol family came in this village from Wandri village punjab state. Now this time there are hidus sikh and a few Muslim family in this village.All caste people about 4200 live together.There are two banks SBBJ and PSB,society,Govt.Aaurvadik hospital,patwar ghar, Govt. sec. school,Govt girls upper primary school, govt primary school,sh.Gurunanak public u.p school and The star public sr. sec. school,A very beauti ful Sh.Gurudwara bhawan on Daliya wali road,A shiv temple on the Sri Ganganagar Sadul shahar road,A very beautiful railway station, Raj medical store and two other medical store,Many other necessary shops etc. It village is progress day by day.There is also an old Ram Dev temple in this village. TH.KUNDAN (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:India Bible College & Seminary, Kumbanad 2

Hello, Ts12rAc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "India Bible College & Seminary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Ts12rAc,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion taggings

Hello, Ts12rAc,

When you tag a page for speedy deletion, please do not blank the page. The patrolling admin will then have to go into the page history to see if the tagging is appropriate. Just a head's up for any future taggings. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

ok. -Ts12rAc^talk 07:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Ts12rAc,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Ts12rAc,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Ts12rAc,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Ts12rAc:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Ts12rAc,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Announcements from WikiProject Cricket

Annual Cricket Newsletter – Issue I, December 2024 • Published by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Annual newsletter to be lauched WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated. Project news: Project news from WP:CRIC including the list of Awards presented in 2024 and the final results of Contests held in 2024. Article news: Article news from WP:CRIC including list of FAC, FLC, FPC, PR, GAN, ITN, RD etc. from 2024. Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway. You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You! Upcoming contests Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October. Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon. Visit the contests page for the latest information. Ongoing discussions A discussion about merging the child WikiProjects WP:IPL, WP:BPL, WP:PSL and WP:LPL back into WP:CRIC as taskforces is currently ongoing in the project talk page. • Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests • You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here • Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ts12rAc. Thank you for your work on Manav Suthar. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I am marking it reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Ts12rAc! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)