Icosian calculus: Difference between revisions
Will Orrick (talk | contribs) added Sowell reference; corrected definition of lambda; added description of mu; added section on Hamiltonian paths in the dodecahedron. |
Will Orrick (talk | contribs) m →Informal definition: typo fix |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
For example, the edge obtained by making a left turn from <math>(B,C)</math> is <math>(C,P)</math>. Indeed, <math>\kappa</math> applied to <math>(B,C)</math> produces <math>(D,C)</math> and <math>\lambda</math> applied to <math>(D,C)</math> produces <math>(C,P)</math>. Also, <math>\kappa^2</math> applied to <math>(B,C)</math> produces <math>(P,C)</math> and <math>\iota</math> applied to <math>(P,C)</math> produces <math>(C,P)</math>. |
For example, the edge obtained by making a left turn from <math>(B,C)</math> is <math>(C,P)</math>. Indeed, <math>\kappa</math> applied to <math>(B,C)</math> produces <math>(D,C)</math> and <math>\lambda</math> applied to <math>(D,C)</math> produces <math>(C,P)</math>. Also, <math>\kappa^2</math> applied to <math>(B,C)</math> produces <math>(P,C)</math> and <math>\iota</math> applied to <math>(P,C)</math> produces <math>(C,P)</math>. |
||
These permutations are not rotations of the dodecahedron. Nevertheless, the group of permutations generated by these symbols is isomorphic to the rotation group of the dodecahedron, a fact that can be deduced from a specific feature of [[Symmetric graph#Cubic symmetric graphs|symmetric cubic graph]]s, of which the dodecahedron graph is an example. The rotation group of the dodecahedron has the property that for a given directed edge there is a unique rotation that sends that directed edge to any other specified directed edge. Hence by choosing a reference edge, say <math>(B,C)</math>, a one-to-one correspondence between directed edges and rotations is established: let <math>g_E</math> be the rotation that sends the reference edge <math>R</math> to directed edge <math>E</math>. (Indeed, there are 60 directed edges |
These permutations are not rotations of the dodecahedron. Nevertheless, the group of permutations generated by these symbols is isomorphic to the rotation group of the dodecahedron, a fact that can be deduced from a specific feature of [[Symmetric graph#Cubic symmetric graphs|symmetric cubic graph]]s, of which the dodecahedron graph is an example. The rotation group of the dodecahedron has the property that for a given directed edge there is a unique rotation that sends that directed edge to any other specified directed edge. Hence by choosing a reference edge, say <math>(B,C)</math>, a one-to-one correspondence between directed edges and rotations is established: let <math>g_E</math> be the rotation that sends the reference edge <math>R</math> to directed edge <math>E</math>. (Indeed, there are 60 directed edges and 60 rotations.) The rotations are permutations of the set of directed edges of a different sort. Let <math>g(E)</math> denote the image of edge <math>E</math> under the rotation <math>g</math>. The icosian associated to <math>g</math> sends the reference edge <math>R</math> to the same directed edge as does <math>g</math>, namely to <math>g(R)</math>. The result of applying that icosian to any other edge <math>E</math> is <math>g_Eg(R) = g_Egg_E^{-1}(E)</math>.<ref name="biggs">{{cite journal | author-last = Biggs | author-first = Norman | title = The Icosian Calculus of Today | journal = Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences | volume = 95A | year = 1995 | pages = 23–34 | jstor = 20490184}}</ref> |
||
== Application to Hamiltonian circuits on the edges of the dodecahedron == |
== Application to Hamiltonian circuits on the edges of the dodecahedron == |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 29 November 2024
The icosian calculus is a non-commutative algebraic structure discovered by the Irish mathematician William Rowan Hamilton in 1856.[1][2] In modern terms, he gave a group presentation of the icosahedral rotation group by generators and relations.
Hamilton's discovery derived from his attempts to find an algebra of "triplets" or 3-tuples that he believed would reflect the three Cartesian axes. The symbols of the icosian calculus correspond to moves between vertices on a dodecahedron. (Hamilton originally thought in terms of moves between the faces of an icosahedron, which is equivalent by duality. This is the origin of the name "icosian".[3]) Hamilton's work in this area resulted indirectly in the terms Hamiltonian circuit and Hamiltonian path in graph theory.[4] He also invented the icosian game as a means of illustrating and popularising his discovery.
Informal definition
[edit]The algebra is based on three symbols, , , and , that Hamilton described as "roots of unity", by which he meant that repeated application of any of them a particular number of times yields the identity, which he denoted by 1. Specifically, they satisfy the relations,
Hamilton gives one additional relation between the symbols,
which is to be understood as application of followed by application of . Hamilton points out that application in the reverse order produces a different result, implying that composition or multiplication of symbols is not generally commutative, although it is associative. The symbols generate a group of order 60, isomorphic to the group of rotations of a regular icosahedron or dodecahedron, and therefore to the alternating group of degree five. This, however, is not how Hamilton described them.
Hamilton drew comparisons between the icosians and his system of quaternions, but noted that, unlike quaternions, which can be added and multiplied, obeying a distributive law, the icosians could only, as far as he knew, be multiplied.
Hamilton understood his symbols by reference to the dodecahedron, which he represented in flattened form as a graph in the plane. The dodecahedron has 30 edges, and if arrows are placed on edges, there are two possible arrow directions for each edge, resulting in 60 directed edges. Each symbol corresponds to a permutation of the set of directed edges.
- The icosian symbol reverses the arrow on every edge. Hence , representing an edge with an arrow pointing from to is transformed into . Similarly, applying to produces , and to produces .
- The icosian symbol , applied to an edge, produces the edge with the same endpoint that is encountered first as one moves around the endpoint in the anticlockwise direction. Hence applying to produces , to produces , and to produces .
- The icosian symbol applied to an edge produces the edge that results from making a right turn at the end point. Hence applying to produces , to produces , and to produces . Comparing the results of applying and to the same edge exhibits the rule .
It is useful to define the symbol for the operation that produces the edge that results from making a left turn at the endpoint of the edge to which the operation is applied. This symbol satisfies the relations
For example, the edge obtained by making a left turn from is . Indeed, applied to produces and applied to produces . Also, applied to produces and applied to produces .
These permutations are not rotations of the dodecahedron. Nevertheless, the group of permutations generated by these symbols is isomorphic to the rotation group of the dodecahedron, a fact that can be deduced from a specific feature of symmetric cubic graphs, of which the dodecahedron graph is an example. The rotation group of the dodecahedron has the property that for a given directed edge there is a unique rotation that sends that directed edge to any other specified directed edge. Hence by choosing a reference edge, say , a one-to-one correspondence between directed edges and rotations is established: let be the rotation that sends the reference edge to directed edge . (Indeed, there are 60 directed edges and 60 rotations.) The rotations are permutations of the set of directed edges of a different sort. Let denote the image of edge under the rotation . The icosian associated to sends the reference edge to the same directed edge as does , namely to . The result of applying that icosian to any other edge is .[5]
Application to Hamiltonian circuits on the edges of the dodecahedron
[edit]A word consisting of the symbols and corresponds to a sequence of right and left turns in the graph. Specifying such a word along with an initial directed edge therefore specifies a directed path along the edges of the dodecahedron. If the group element represented by the word equals the identity, then the path returns to the initial directed edge in the final step. If the additional requirement is imposed that every vertex of the graph be visited exactly once—specifically that every vertex occur exactly once as the endpoint of a directed edge in the path—then a Hamiltonian circuit is obtained. Finding such a circuit was one of the challenges posed by Hamilton's icosian game. Hamilton exhibited the word with the properties described above.[5] Any of the 60 directed edges may serve as initial edge as a consequence of the symmetry of the dodecahedron, but only 30 distinct Hamiltonian circuits are obtained in this way, up to shift in starting point, because the word consists of the same sequence of 10 left and right turns repeated twice. The word with the roles of and interchanged has the same properties, but these give the same Hamiltonian cycles, up to shift in initial edge and reversal of direction.[3] Hence Hamilton's word accounts for all Hamiltonian cycles in the dodecahedron, whose number is known to be 30.
Legacy
[edit]The icosian calculus is one of the earliest examples of many mathematical ideas, including:
- presenting and studying a group by generators and relations;
- visualization of a group by a graph, which led to combinatorial group theory and later geometric group theory;
- Hamiltonian circuits and Hamiltonian paths in graph theory;[4]
- dessin d'enfant[6][7] – see dessin d'enfant: history for details.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ William Rowan Hamilton (1856). "Memorandum respecting a new System of Roots of Unity" (PDF). Philosophical Magazine. 12: 446.
- ^ Thomas L. Hankins (1980). Sir William Rowan Hamilton. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 474. ISBN 0-8018-6973-0.
- ^ a b Sowell, Katye O. (2001), "Hamilton's icosian calculus and his icosian game", Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 1 (24), Article 14, doi:10.5642/hmnj.200101.24.14, archived from the original on 11 March 2024, retrieved 25 April 2024
- ^ a b Norman L. Biggs; E. Keith Lloyd; Robin J. Wilson (1976). Graph theory 1736–1936. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 239. ISBN 0-19-853901-0.
- ^ a b Biggs, Norman (1995). "The Icosian Calculus of Today". Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 95A: 23–34. JSTOR 20490184.
- ^ Jones, Gareth (1995). "Dessins d'enfants: bipartite maps and Galois groups". Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire. B35d: 4.
- ^ W. R. Hamilton, Letter to John T. Graves "On the Icosian" (17 October 1856), Mathematical papers, Vol. III, Algebra, eds. H. Halberstam and R. E. Ingram, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967, pp. 612–625.