Jump to content

Ouse Valley Viaduct: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 51°02′05″N 0°06′52″W / 51.03472°N 0.11444°W / 51.03472; -0.11444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
cleaned up 4 refs, combined identical refs
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Viaduct carrying the London-Brighton Railway Line over the River Ouse in Sussex, UK}}
{{short description|Railway viaduct in Sussex, UK, carries the London–Brighton line}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2016}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2016}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2016}}
{{about|the Brighton Main Line viaduct|the West Coast Main line viaduct over the Great Ouse|Wolverton Viaduct}}
{{Infobox bridge
{{Infobox bridge
| name = Ouse Valley Viaduct
| name = Ouse Valley Viaduct
| other_name = Balcombe Viaduct
| other_name = Balcombe Viaduct
| image = Ouse Valley Viaduct.JPG
| image = Ouse Valley Viaduct.JPG
| image_upright =
| image_upright =
| alt =
| caption = Northern end of Ouse Valley Viaduct
| alt =
| coordinates = {{coord|51|02|05|N|0|06|52|W|type:landmark_region:GB|display=title,inline}}
| caption = Northern end of Ouse Valley Viaduct
| os_grid_reference =
| coordinates = {{coord|51|02|05|N|0|06|52|W|type:landmark_region:GB|display=title,inline}}
| carries = [[Brighton Main Line]]
| os_grid_reference =
| crosses = [[River Ouse, Sussex]]
| carries = [[London and Brighton Railway]]
| locale = Between [[Haywards Heath]] and [[Balcombe]]
| crosses = [[River Ouse, Sussex]]
| official_name =
| locale = Between [[Haywards Heath]] and [[Balcombe]]
| official_name =
| named_for =
| named_for =
| owner =
| maint = [[Network Rail]]
| owner =
| heritage = [[Grade II*]] [[listed building]]
| maint = [[Network Rail]]
| id =
| heritage = [[Grade II*]] [[listed building]]
| id =
| id_type =
| id_type =
| website =
| website =
| preceded =
| preceded =
| followed =
| followed =
| design =
| design =
| material =
| material =
| material1 =
| material2 = Brick
| material1 =
| length = {{convert|450|m|abbr=on}}
| material2 = Brick
| length = {{convert|450|m|abbr=on}}
| width = {{convert|13|m|abbr=on}}
| height =
| width = {{convert|13|m|abbr=on}}
| height =
| depth =
| depth =
| traversable =
| traversable =
| towpath =
| towpath =
| mainspan =
| number_spans = 37
| mainspan =
| piers_in_water =
| number_spans = 37
| piers_in_water =
| load =
| load =
| clearance_above =
| clearance_above =
| clearance_below =
| clearance_below =
| lanes =
| lanes =
| life =
| num_track = 2
| life =
| track_gauge = {{Track gauge|standard}}
| num_track = 2
| structure_gauge =
| track_gauge = {{Track gauge|standard}}
| structure_gauge =
| electrification =
| electrification =
| architect =
| designer = [[John Urpeth Rastrick]]
| architect =
| designer = [[John Urpeth Rastrick]]
| contracted_designer = [[David Mocatta]]
| contracted_designer = [[David Mocatta]]
| winner =
| winner =
| engineering =
| engineering =
| builder =
| builder =
| fabricator =
| fabricator =
| begin =
| complete = 1842
| begin =
| cost = £38,500 (1841)
| complete = 1842
| cost = £38,500 (1841)
| open = July 1841
| inaugurated =
| open = July 1841
| inaugurated =
| rebuilt =
| rebuilt =
| collapsed =
| collapsed =
| closed =
| closed =
| replaces =
| replaces =
| replaced_by =
| replaced_by =
| traffic =
| toll =
| traffic = [[Brighton Main Line]]
| toll =
| map_type =
| map_type =
| map_relief =
| map_relief =
| map_dot_label =
| map_dot_label =
| map_image =
| map_image =
| map_size =
| map_size =
| map_alt =
| map_alt =
| map_caption =
| map_caption =
}}
}}


The '''Ouse Valley Viaduct''' (erroneously known as the '''Balcombe Viaduct''') carries the [[London and Brighton Railway|London-Brighton Railway Line]] over the [[River Ouse, Sussex|River Ouse]] in [[Sussex]]. It is located to the north of [[Haywards Heath]] and to the south of [[Balcombe]]. Known for its ornate design, the structure has been described as "probably the most elegant viaduct in Britain."<ref>[http://www.transportheritage.com/find-heritage-locations.html?sobi2Task=sobi2Details&sobi2Id=84 ''Our Transport Heritage.''] ''transportheritage.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref><ref>[http://www.theargus.co.uk/magazine/sussex_walks/11605962.Under_the_arches/ "Under the Arches."] ''The Argus'', 22 November 2014.</ref><ref>{{Cite news
The '''Ouse Valley Viaduct''' (or the '''Balcombe Viaduct''') carries the [[Brighton Main Line]] over the [[River Ouse, Sussex|River Ouse]] in [[Sussex]]. It is located to the north of [[Haywards Heath]] and the south of [[Balcombe]]. Known for its ornate design, the structure has been described as "probably the most elegant [[viaduct]] in Britain."<ref>[http://www.transportheritage.com/find-heritage-locations.html?sobi2Task=sobi2Details&sobi2Id=84 ''Our Transport Heritage.''] ''transportheritage.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref><ref>[http://www.theargus.co.uk/magazine/sussex_walks/11605962.Under_the_arches/ "Under the Arches."] ''The Argus'', 22 November 2014.</ref><ref>{{Cite news
|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/news/stunning-drone-photos-show-off-britains-most-beautiful-landmarks/balcombe-viaduct/
|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/news/stunning-drone-photos-show-off-britains-most-beautiful-landmarks/balcombe-viaduct/
|title=Stunning drone photos show off Britain's most beautiful landmarks
|title=Stunning drone photos show off Britain's most beautiful landmarks
Line 81: Line 82:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Construction of the Ouse Valley Viaduct commenced by the [[London & Brighton Railway]] company during 1839.<ref name = "eng time" /> It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, [[John Urpeth Rastrick]], in association with the architect of the London to Brighton railway, [[David Mocatta]]. The viaduct is {{Convert|96|ft}} high and is carried on 37 semi-circular arches, each of {{Convert|30|ft}}, surmounted by [[balustrade]]s, spanning a total length of {{Convert|1480|ft}}. Each pier contains a [[jack arch]] with a semi-circular [[soffit]], which had the benefit of reducing the number of bricks required.{{sfnp|Turner|1977|p=124}} The roughly 11 million bricks required for its construction were mostly shipped up the River Ouse (via [[Newhaven, East Sussex|Newhaven]] and [[Lewes]]) from the [[Netherlands]]. On 12 July 1841, the viaduct was officially opened to train services, although the structure was not fully completed until the following year.
Construction of the Ouse Valley Viaduct commenced by the [[London & Brighton Railway]] company the beginning of 1839.<ref name = "eng time" /> It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, [[John Urpeth Rastrick]]. The architect of the London to Brighton railway, [[David Mocatta]] is often associated with the ornate stonework but an 1843 contemporary report on the construction of the viaduct makes no mention of him and neither does a drawing of one of the pavilions in a collection of Rastrick's drawings.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3089490 | title=Catalogue description Coloured drawings bearing the signature of J U Rastrick, engineer of the company }}</ref> The viaduct is {{Convert|96|ft}} high and is carried on 37 semi-circular arches, each of {{Convert|30|ft}}, surmounted by [[balustrade]]s, spanning a total length of {{Convert|1480|ft}}. Each pier contains a [[jack arch]] with a semi-circular [[soffit]], which had the benefit of reducing the number of bricks required.{{sfnp|Turner|1977|p=124}} On 12 July 1841, the viaduct was officially opened to train services, although the finishing details were not fully completed until the following year.


Despite the structure's fine design, materials and architectural features, the viaduct has had an expensive and problematic history. The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s, during which sections of the original brickwork were entirely replaced in the belief that this would increase the structure's strength. However, the viaduct suffered considerable decay during the majority of the twentieth century. By May 1983, the viaduct had been recognised as a [[Grade II*]] [[listed building|listed structure]]. Between March 1996 and September 1999, the viaduct was subject to an extensive restoration by national rail infrastructure owner [[Railtrack]]; this work was part-funded by the [[Railway Heritage Trust]], [[English Heritage]] and [[West Sussex County Council]].
Despite the structure's fine design, materials, and architectural features, the viaduct has had an expensive and problematic history. The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s, during which sections of the original brickwork were entirely replaced in the belief that this would increase the structure's strength. However, the viaduct suffered considerable decay during the majority of the twentieth century. By May 1983, the viaduct had been recognised as a [[Grade II*]] [[listed building|listed structure]]. Between March 1996 and September 1999, the viaduct was subject to an extensive restoration by national rail infrastructure owner [[Railtrack]]; this work was part-funded by the [[Railway Heritage Trust]], [[English Heritage]] and [[West Sussex County Council]].


==Construction==
==Construction==
During July 1837, an [[Act of Parliament]] was passed which gave the [[London & Brighton Railway]] company assent to construct its proposed railway line between London and the south coast.<ref name = "eng time" /> The route selected, which was [[surveying|surveyed]] by a team headed by [[John Rennie the Younger|Sir John Rennie]], was fairly direct but had the downside of crossing over some relatively hilly terrain. As a consequence of a decision to limit gradients along the line to 1 in 264, the construction of a total of four tunnels and a single viaduct, the latter crossing the [[River Ouse, Sussex|Ouse Valley]] between [[Balcombe]] and [[Haywards Heath]] in [[West Sussex]], was necessary.<ref name = "eng time" />
In July 1837, an [[Act of Parliament]] was passed which gave the [[London & Brighton Railway]] company assent to construct its proposed railway line between London and the south coast.<ref name = "eng time" /> The route selected, which was [[surveying|surveyed]] by a team headed by [[John Rennie the Younger|Sir John Rennie]], was fairly direct but had the downside of crossing over some relatively hilly terrain. As a consequence of a decision to limit gradients along the line to 1 in 264, the construction of a total of five tunnels and three viaducts, was necessary.<ref name = "eng time" />


[[File:viaductverttn.jpg|thumb|left|The arched vaulting supporting brick piers]]
[[File:viaductverttn.jpg|thumb|left|The arched vaulting supporting brick piers]]
Construction of the new line commenced during July 1838; work to build the ornate viaduct began during the following year.<ref name = "eng time"/> It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, [[John Urpeth Rastrick]], in association with the architect of the London to Brighton railway, [[David Mocatta]].<ref name = "lloyd bath" >Jefferson, Lloyd. [http://www.bath.ac.uk/ace/uploads/StudentProjects/Bridgeconference2011/papers/Bridge_2_-_Lloyd_Jefferson.pdf "A critical analysis of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, West Sussex."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160423235721/http://www.bath.ac.uk/ace/uploads/StudentProjects/Bridgeconference2011/papers/Bridge_2_-_Lloyd_Jefferson.pdf |date=23 April 2016 }} ''University of Bath'', April 2010.</ref>{{sfnp|Burman|Stratton|2014|page=61}} The contractor appointed for its construction was Benjamin Baylis.<ref name = "eng time"/> The total cost of the viaduct's construction reportedly came to £38,500<ref>{{Cite book
Construction of the new line commenced in July 1838; work to build the ornate viaduct began during the following year.<ref name = "eng time"/> It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, [[John Urpeth Rastrick]] and the original contractor appointed for its construction was Benjamin Baylis.<ref name = "eng time"/> The accepted contract tender was £38,500 <ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Contract between the London and Brighton Railway and Benjamin Bayliss, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, for railway construction from the Ouse Valley viaduct, Balcombe, to Cuckfield |url=https://www.thekeep.info/collections/getrecord/GB179_ACC8894_3_10 |website=The Keep}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book
| last= Body
| last= Body
| first= Geoffrey
| first= Geoffrey
Line 98: Line 99:
| page= [https://archive.org/details/railwaysofsouthe0000body/page/141 141]
| page= [https://archive.org/details/railwaysofsouthe0000body/page/141 141]
| url= https://archive.org/details/railwaysofsouthe0000body/page/141
| url= https://archive.org/details/railwaysofsouthe0000body/page/141
}}</ref> (equivalent to £{{Format price|{{Inflation|UK|38500|1841}}}} in {{Inflation/year|UK}}{{Inflation-fn|UK}}).
}}</ref> (equivalent to about £3.6 million in 2016<ref>[http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/education/Pages/resources/inflationtools/calculator/flash/default.aspx "Inflation calculator."] ''[[Bank of England]]'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref>).


The viaduct was designed as a relatively elegant structure, being around {{Convert|500|m||order=flip}} in length and carrying a straight line over 37 identical arches. Each of these semi-circular arches had a span of {{Convert|9.1|m||order=flip}} and was supported upon [[tapering (mathematics)|tapered]] red-brick piers.<ref name = "eng time"/> Each pier was almost divided into two separate halves by {{Convert|3|m||adj=on|order=flip}} vertical voids, capped by semi-circular rings at the top and base, as a weight-saving measure. This approach is credited with giving the structure a relatively slender appearance.<ref name = "eng time" /><ref name = "lloyd bath" /> The foundation of each pier is provided with two courses of inclined footings, which have a total depth of just over {{Convert|1|m||order=flip}}.<ref name = "lloyd bath"/>
The viaduct was designed as a elegant structure, being around {{Convert|500|m||order=flip}} in length and carrying a straight line over 37 identical arches. Each of these semi-circular arches had a span of {{Convert|9.1|m||order=flip}} and was supported upon [[tapering (mathematics)|tapered]] red-brick piers.<ref name = "eng time"/> Each pier was almost divided into two separate halves by {{Convert|3|m||adj=on|order=flip}} vertical voids, capped by semi-circular rings at the top and base, as a weight-saving measure. This approach is credited with giving the structure a slender appearance.<ref name = "eng time" /><ref name="lloyd bath">Jefferson, Lloyd. [http://www.bath.ac.uk/ace/uploads/StudentProjects/Bridgeconference2011/papers/Bridge_2_-_Lloyd_Jefferson.pdf "A critical analysis of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, West Sussex."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160423235721/http://www.bath.ac.uk/ace/uploads/StudentProjects/Bridgeconference2011/papers/Bridge_2_-_Lloyd_Jefferson.pdf|date=23 April 2016}} ''University of Bath'', April 2010.</ref> The foundation of each pier is provided with two courses of inclined footings, which have a total depth of just over {{Convert|1|m||order=flip}}.<ref name = "lloyd bath"/>


In terms of its composition, the viaduct is largely composed of traditional red bricks and smooth [[limestone]].<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> The contrast between the two materials effectively highlights the deck and upper elements of the structure to the observer, although the limestone has been subjected to considerable weathering and staining since its original installation. Elements of both the brickwork and the limestone have been replaced over time in order to maintain the structure's integrity, extend its operational life, and to restore its appearance to better resemble its earlier state.<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> At its highest point, the Ouse Valley Viaduct is {{Convert|29.3|m||order=flip}} above the river crossing beneath it.<ref name = "eng time"/>
The viaduct is mostly composed of traditional red bricks topped with smooth [[limestone]].<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> The contrast between the two materials effectively highlights the deck and upper elements of the structure, although the limestone has been subjected to considerable weathering and staining since its original installation. The brickwork and the limestone elements have been replaced over time to maintain the structure's integrity, extend its operational life, and restore its appearance to better resemble its original state.<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> At its highest point, the Ouse Valley Viaduct is {{Convert|29.3|m||order=flip}} above the river.<ref name = "eng time"/>


There have been various claims that many of the estimated 11 million bricks used in the construction, were produced as far away as the Netherlands. No primary sources are cited with these claims and they are at odds with the contemporary newspaper reporting and the London & Brighton Railway Company's own meeting minute books held at The National Archives (RAIL 386/1 <ref>{{cite web |title=Meetings of proprietors |url=https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3089400 |website=The National Archives}}</ref> and RAIL 386/6 <ref>{{cite web |title=Meetings of directors |url=https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3089405 |website=The National Archives}}</ref>).
In the process of constructing the viaduct, it has been estimated that around 11 million bricks, many of which had been shipped across the [[English Channel]] from the [[Netherlands]] to [[Newhaven, East Sussex|Newhaven]] and [[Lewes]] in addition to some locally produced bricks, had been used for the structure.{{sfnp|Turner|1977|p=124}}<ref name = "ice" /> Furthermore, [[Caen stone]] was also brought from [[Normandy]] in France; this material was used for the classically balustraded parapets, string courses, pier caps and the four small rectangular Italianate pavilions.<ref name = "eng time"/><ref name = "lloyd bath"/> Building materials were transported to the construction site on barges up the Ouse River Navigation. At each end of the [[abutment]] is an ornamental square open tower, the brickwork of which is faced with stone from Heddon Quarries near [[Newcastle-upon-Tyne]].{{sfnp|Turner|1977|p=124}}

16 Jan 1839 Excerpt from TNA RAIL 386/1 Meetings of Proprietors of the LBR 1838 – 1844
''“These Contracts are all let and the Contractors are actively engaged in casting up Brick Earth, preparing materials, and getting them to the ground to commence the work immediately as the weather permits”''

6 June 1839 TNA RAIL 386/6 Meetings of Directors 1840 – 1843
''“Contract No 10 the Ouse Viaduct is in a very progressive state – the Contractor (Baylis) has already got 10 Foundations for the Piers of the Arches laid, & his arrangements display a considerable degree of experience & confidence as to its completion at a period sufficiently early with regard to its stability & preparations are afoot for making Six Millions of Bricks this summer”''

The core construction was complete at the beginning of December 1840, the Brighton Gazette reporting 12 Dec 1840 <ref name=":0">{{Cite news |date=1841-08-12 |title=London and Brighton Railway |url=https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000938/18410812/047/0003 |access-date=2024-11-16 |work=Brighton Gazette |via=[[The British Newspaper Archive]]}}</ref>
"''On Thursday the last arch of the Ouse Viaduct on the London to Brighton Railway was keyed by Mr Maude, the resident engineer of the centre district of the railway, in the presence of the parties engaged on the work, together with a considerable number of visitors from Brighton and Lewes".

The original contract of works dated 21 Jan 1839 (East Sussex Records Office ACC 8894/3/1)<ref name=":1" /> specified the stone work to have come from UK quarries but this changed to [[Caen stone]] from [[Normandy]] in France. This material was used for the classically balustraded parapets, string courses, pier caps and the four small rectangular Italianate pavilions.<ref name = "eng time"/><ref name = "lloyd bath"/>

There appear to have been delays in sourcing this and other materials as a minute in the Meetings of Directors 1838-1844 (RAIL 386/6) notes on 15 July 1841 that ''"The whole length of the Viaduct is 480 yards and the width between the parapets is 28 feet. The Brickwork is completed, and almost all the centres are struck, but the parapet which is to be very handsome, and of stone from Caen in Normandy is yet in a very backward state and cannot be finished for some weeks"''. Rastrick created a moving scaffold for the masons to continue the work with a single line in use. A report in the Brighton Gazette on 12 August <ref name=":0" /> noted that both lines were then in operation.


==Opening==
==Opening==
[[File:Ouse Valley Viaduct top.jpg|thumb|Southbound view from on top of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, 2009]]
[[File:Ouse Valley Viaduct top.jpg|thumb|Southbound view from on top of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, 2009]]
The [[Brighton Main Line]] was opened in two sections because completion was delayed by the need to construct some major earthworks.<ref name = "eng time" /> The viaduct was officially opened when the section between [[Norwood Junction railway station|Norwood Junction]] and [[Haywards Heath railway station|Haywards Heath]] was opened on 12 July 1841. Initially, there was only one track across the structure in operation; the second line, along with the viaduct's ornate stone parapets and pavilions, was not completed until the following year.<ref name = "eng time" /><ref name = "lloyd bath" />
The [[Brighton Main Line]] was opened in two sections because completion was delayed by the need to complete major earthworks, in particular the tunnel at Haywards Heath.<ref name = "eng time" /> The viaduct was officially opened when the section between [[Norwood Junction railway station|Norwood Junction]] and [[Haywards Heath railway station|Haywards Heath]] was opened on 12 July 1841.


By 1846, the viaduct had become part of the [[London, Brighton and South Coast Railway]].<ref name = "eng time" /> In 1923, as a result of the [[Railways Act 1921]], it became part of the [[Southern Railway (UK)|Southern Railway]] network. It remained under Southern's ownership until January 1948, when the [[nationalisation]] of the [[Big Four (British railway companies)|Big Four railway companies]] formed the publicly owned railway operator [[British Rail]]ways.<ref name = "eng time" />
By 1846, the viaduct had become part of the [[London, Brighton and South Coast Railway]].<ref name = "eng time" /> In 1923, as a result of the [[Railways Act 1921]], it became part of the [[Southern Railway (UK)|Southern Railway]] network. It remained under Southern's ownership until January 1948, when the [[nationalisation]] of the [[Big Four (British railway companies)|Big Four railway companies]] formed the publicly owned railway operator [[British Rail]]ways.<ref name = "eng time" />


==Maintenance and restoration==
==Maintenance and restoration==
The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s. This had focused upon repairs to the brickwork because engineers of the late Victorian era were concerned that the original lime mortar used in the viaduct's construction was inadequate. It was decided that this should be replaced with cement mortar. However, replacement facing brickwork and substandard mortar eventually caused its own failures prompting more expensive repairs later on.<ref name = "eng time"/> This was likely due to the repair work having borne a greater share of the structure's load than intended, resulting in an accelerated failure rate; poorly bonded header bricks are another probable culprit for its ineffectiveness. Additionally, the parapets and pavilions, although made from [[Caen stone]] (a high-quality limestone), have been subjected to heavy [[weathering]].<ref name = "eng time" />
The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s, and was focused on repairs to the brickwork. Engineers of the late Victorian era were concerned that the original lime mortar used in the viaduct's construction was inadequate and the decision was made to replace it with cement mortar. However, the replacement facing brickwork and substandard mortar eventually caused its own failures prompting more expensive repairs later on.<ref name = "eng time"/> This was likely due to the repair work having borne a greater share of the structure's load than intended, resulting in an accelerated failure rate. Poorly bonded header bricks are another probable culprit for its ineffectiveness. Additionally, the parapets and pavilions, although made from [[Caen stone]] (a high-quality limestone), have been subjected to heavy [[weathering]].<ref name = "eng time" />


[[File:Ouse Valley viaduct.jpg|thumb|center|upright=3.0|The Ouse Valley Viaduct in 2007, with the four decorative pavilions visible at each end]]
[[File:Ouse Valley viaduct.jpg|thumb|center|upright=3.0|The Ouse Valley Viaduct in 2007, with the four decorative pavilions visible at each end]]
By 1956, the damage to the viaduct was extensive but the cost of refurbishment work was deemed to be too high by British Rail.<ref name = "eng time"/> The degradation was partially a consequence of the structure's long lifespan: when originally constructed, its designers had intended for the structure to have a design life of 120 years, which it had long since exceeded.<ref name = "lloyd bath" /> By May 1983, the viaduct had been officially recognised as a [[Grade II*]] [[listed building|listed structure]].<ref>{{NHLE
By 1956, the damage to the viaduct was extensive but the cost of refurbishment work was deemed too high by British Rail.<ref name = "eng time"/> The degradation was partially a consequence of the structure's long lifespan: when originally constructed in the 1840s, its intended design life was only 120 years.<ref name = "lloyd bath" /> By May 1983, the viaduct had been officially recognised as a [[Grade II*]] [[listed building|listed structure]].<ref>{{NHLE
|num= 1366101
|num= 1366101
|desc=OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT THE OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT
|desc=OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT THE OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT
Line 122: Line 136:
}}</ref><ref>[http://www.transporttrust.com/heritage-sites/heritage-detail/ouse-valley-viaduct "Ouse Valley Viaduct."] ''transporttrust.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref>
}}</ref><ref>[http://www.transporttrust.com/heritage-sites/heritage-detail/ouse-valley-viaduct "Ouse Valley Viaduct."] ''transporttrust.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref>


By the 1980s, the eight pavilions present on the viaduct were in such a poor condition that some of their roofs had fallen in and the installation of internal props was required to stop them collapsing further.<ref name = "eng time"/> As a consequence of its heritage status, all envisioned alterations to the viaduct need to be reviewed and agreed by [[English Heritage]].<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> When British Rail proposed to dismantle the original pavilions and rebuild them using reconstituted stonework, English Heritage refused permission to do so; accordingly, there were no substantial restoration performed to the viaduct during this period, a decision which British Rail publicly attributed to the sizeable cost of undertaking such work. The fabric of the structure continued to deteriorate over the next decade; sections of the stonework began to fall away from the balustrades and parapets during this time.<ref name = "eng time">[http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=93 "Ouse Viaduct, Balcombe."] ''engineering-timelines.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref><ref name = "ice"/>
By the 1980s, the eight pavilions present on the viaduct were in such a poor condition that some of their roofs had fallen in and the installation of internal props was required to halt their further collapse.<ref name = "eng time"/> As a consequence of its heritage status, all envisioned alterations to the viaduct need to be reviewed and agreed upon by [[English Heritage]].<ref name = "lloyd bath"/> When British Rail proposed to dismantle the original pavilions and rebuild them using reconstituted stonework, English Heritage refused permissions; accordingly, there was no substantial restoration performed to the viaduct during this period, a decision which British Rail publicly attributed to the sizeable estimated cost of such works. The fabric of the structure continued to deteriorate over the next decade, with sections of stonework falling away from the balustrades and parapets.<ref name = "eng time">[http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=93 "Ouse Viaduct, Balcombe."] ''engineering-timelines.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref><ref name = "ice"/>


Starting in March 1996, the viaduct underwent a £6.5 million renovation overseen by national rail infrastructure company [[Railtrack]] and partially funded by grants from [[West Sussex County Council]], Railway Heritage Trust<ref>[http://railwayheritagetrust.co.uk/ Railway Heritage Trust]</ref> and [[English Heritage]].<ref name = "ice"/><ref name = "lloyd bath"/> Harder-wearing limestone was imported from [[Bordeaux]] to ensure the closest match with the existing Caen stone in the balustrades and pavilions.<ref>{{cite web
Starting in March 1996, the viaduct underwent a £6.5 million renovation overseen by the national rail infrastructure company [[Railtrack]] and partially funded by grants from [[West Sussex County Council]], Railway Heritage Trust<ref>[http://railwayheritagetrust.co.uk/ Railway Heritage Trust]</ref> and [[English Heritage]].<ref name = "ice"/><ref name = "lloyd bath"/> Harder-wearing limestone was imported from [[Bordeaux]] to ensure the closest match with the existing Caen stone in the balustrades and pavilions.<ref>{{cite web
|title=Trusting in Trusts: The Railway Heritage Trust: conservation and change
|title=Trusting in Trusts: The Railway Heritage Trust: conservation and change
|url= http://www.ihbc.org.uk/context_archive/58/railway/br.html
|url= http://www.ihbc.org.uk/context_archive/58/railway/br.html
Line 132: Line 146:
|access-date=4 June 2018
|access-date=4 June 2018
|url-status=dead
|url-status=dead
}}</ref><ref>[https://www.bestofengland.com/ouse-valley-viaduct/ "Ouse Valley Viaduct (aka Balcombe Viaduct)."] ''bestofengland.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref> Some of the piers had to be reconstructed because of failures in the Victorian brickwork. The new bricks were handmade in a variety of sizes to suit the existing brickwork and set in a sand, cement and lime mortar; stainless steel anchoring was used to firmly fix the new stone to the old stonework.<ref name = "eng time"/> Throughout the work, one of the lines always remained open while restoration activity was being carried out on the other side of the viaduct. The project, which took more than three years, was completed during September 1999.<ref name = "ice" >Husband, Mark. [https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/bm4.28548.0085 "Restoration of the Ouse Valley Viaduct."] ''Institute of Civil Engineers'', 2010.</ref>
}}</ref><ref>[https://www.bestofengland.com/ouse-valley-viaduct/ "Ouse Valley Viaduct (aka Balcombe Viaduct)."] ''bestofengland.com'', Retrieved: 4 June 2018.</ref> Some of the piers had to be reconstructed because of failures in the Victorian brickwork. The new bricks were handmade in a variety of sizes to suit the existing brickwork and set in sand, cement, and lime mortar; stainless steel anchoring was used to firmly fix the new stone to the old stonework.<ref name = "eng time"/> Throughout the work, one of the lines always remained open while restoration activity was being carried out on the other side of the viaduct. The project, which took more than three years, was completed in September 1999.<ref name = "ice" >Husband, Mark. [https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/bm4.28548.0085 "Restoration of the Ouse Valley Viaduct."] ''Institute of Civil Engineers'', 2010.</ref>

From 2023, repairs were being undertaken by Network Rail with various companies. As at September 2024 it was unclear when they would finish.<ref>{{cite news |title=Images chart restoration of Victorian viaduct |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9d5p7jjk1o |access-date=6 September 2024 |publisher=BBC News |date=5 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.awltd.co.uk/projects/ouse-valley-viaduct/ | title=Ouse Valley Viaduct -Aw Rail Services | date=21 November 2023 }}</ref>

==Media appearances==
The bridge on the cover art of [[Lovejoy (band)|Lovejoy's]] [[Extended play|EP]], [[Wake Up & It's Over]] was based on the Ouse Valley Duct.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Totino |first1=Marina |title=How Marina Totino made the cover for Lovejoy's new EP Wake Up & It's Over! |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=An2vPmDhAv0 |website=Youtube |date=12 May 2023 |publisher=Livejoy}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 163: Line 182:
[[Category:Grade II* listed buildings in West Sussex]]
[[Category:Grade II* listed buildings in West Sussex]]
[[Category:David Mocatta buildings]]
[[Category:David Mocatta buildings]]
[[Category:Grade II* listed railway bridges and viaducts]]

Latest revision as of 03:42, 17 November 2024

Ouse Valley Viaduct
Northern end of Ouse Valley Viaduct
Coordinates51°02′05″N 0°06′52″W / 51.03472°N 0.11444°W / 51.03472; -0.11444
CarriesBrighton Main Line
CrossesRiver Ouse, Sussex
LocaleBetween Haywards Heath and Balcombe
Other name(s)Balcombe Viaduct
Maintained byNetwork Rail
Heritage statusGrade II* listed building
Characteristics
Pier constructionBrick
Total length450 m (1,480 ft)
Width13 m (43 ft)
No. of spans37
Rail characteristics
No. of tracks2
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in)
History
DesignerJohn Urpeth Rastrick
Contracted lead designerDavid Mocatta
Construction end1842
Construction cost£38,500 (1841)
OpenedJuly 1841
Location
Map

The Ouse Valley Viaduct (or the Balcombe Viaduct) carries the Brighton Main Line over the River Ouse in Sussex. It is located to the north of Haywards Heath and the south of Balcombe. Known for its ornate design, the structure has been described as "probably the most elegant viaduct in Britain."[1][2][3]

Construction of the Ouse Valley Viaduct commenced by the London & Brighton Railway company the beginning of 1839.[4] It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, John Urpeth Rastrick. The architect of the London to Brighton railway, David Mocatta is often associated with the ornate stonework but an 1843 contemporary report on the construction of the viaduct makes no mention of him and neither does a drawing of one of the pavilions in a collection of Rastrick's drawings.[5] The viaduct is 96 feet (29 m) high and is carried on 37 semi-circular arches, each of 30 feet (9.1 m), surmounted by balustrades, spanning a total length of 1,480 feet (450 m). Each pier contains a jack arch with a semi-circular soffit, which had the benefit of reducing the number of bricks required.[6] On 12 July 1841, the viaduct was officially opened to train services, although the finishing details were not fully completed until the following year.

Despite the structure's fine design, materials, and architectural features, the viaduct has had an expensive and problematic history. The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s, during which sections of the original brickwork were entirely replaced in the belief that this would increase the structure's strength. However, the viaduct suffered considerable decay during the majority of the twentieth century. By May 1983, the viaduct had been recognised as a Grade II* listed structure. Between March 1996 and September 1999, the viaduct was subject to an extensive restoration by national rail infrastructure owner Railtrack; this work was part-funded by the Railway Heritage Trust, English Heritage and West Sussex County Council.

Construction

[edit]

In July 1837, an Act of Parliament was passed which gave the London & Brighton Railway company assent to construct its proposed railway line between London and the south coast.[4] The route selected, which was surveyed by a team headed by Sir John Rennie, was fairly direct but had the downside of crossing over some relatively hilly terrain. As a consequence of a decision to limit gradients along the line to 1 in 264, the construction of a total of five tunnels and three viaducts, was necessary.[4]

The arched vaulting supporting brick piers

Construction of the new line commenced in July 1838; work to build the ornate viaduct began during the following year.[4] It was designed by the principal engineer for the line, John Urpeth Rastrick and the original contractor appointed for its construction was Benjamin Baylis.[4] The accepted contract tender was £38,500 [7][8] (equivalent to £4.42 million in 2023[9]).

The viaduct was designed as a elegant structure, being around 1,600 feet (500 m) in length and carrying a straight line over 37 identical arches. Each of these semi-circular arches had a span of 30 feet (9.1 m) and was supported upon tapered red-brick piers.[4] Each pier was almost divided into two separate halves by 9.8-foot (3 m) vertical voids, capped by semi-circular rings at the top and base, as a weight-saving measure. This approach is credited with giving the structure a slender appearance.[4][10] The foundation of each pier is provided with two courses of inclined footings, which have a total depth of just over 3 feet 3 inches (1 m).[10]

The viaduct is mostly composed of traditional red bricks topped with smooth limestone.[10] The contrast between the two materials effectively highlights the deck and upper elements of the structure, although the limestone has been subjected to considerable weathering and staining since its original installation. The brickwork and the limestone elements have been replaced over time to maintain the structure's integrity, extend its operational life, and restore its appearance to better resemble its original state.[10] At its highest point, the Ouse Valley Viaduct is 96 feet (29.3 m) above the river.[4]

There have been various claims that many of the estimated 11 million bricks used in the construction, were produced as far away as the Netherlands. No primary sources are cited with these claims and they are at odds with the contemporary newspaper reporting and the London & Brighton Railway Company's own meeting minute books held at The National Archives (RAIL 386/1 [11] and RAIL 386/6 [12]).

16 Jan 1839 Excerpt from TNA RAIL 386/1 Meetings of Proprietors of the LBR 1838 – 1844 “These Contracts are all let and the Contractors are actively engaged in casting up Brick Earth, preparing materials, and getting them to the ground to commence the work immediately as the weather permits”

6 June 1839 TNA RAIL 386/6 Meetings of Directors 1840 – 1843 “Contract No 10 the Ouse Viaduct is in a very progressive state – the Contractor (Baylis) has already got 10 Foundations for the Piers of the Arches laid, & his arrangements display a considerable degree of experience & confidence as to its completion at a period sufficiently early with regard to its stability & preparations are afoot for making Six Millions of Bricks this summer”

The core construction was complete at the beginning of December 1840, the Brighton Gazette reporting 12 Dec 1840 [13] "On Thursday the last arch of the Ouse Viaduct on the London to Brighton Railway was keyed by Mr Maude, the resident engineer of the centre district of the railway, in the presence of the parties engaged on the work, together with a considerable number of visitors from Brighton and Lewes".

The original contract of works dated 21 Jan 1839 (East Sussex Records Office ACC 8894/3/1)[7] specified the stone work to have come from UK quarries but this changed to Caen stone from Normandy in France. This material was used for the classically balustraded parapets, string courses, pier caps and the four small rectangular Italianate pavilions.[4][10]

There appear to have been delays in sourcing this and other materials as a minute in the Meetings of Directors 1838-1844 (RAIL 386/6) notes on 15 July 1841 that "The whole length of the Viaduct is 480 yards and the width between the parapets is 28 feet. The Brickwork is completed, and almost all the centres are struck, but the parapet which is to be very handsome, and of stone from Caen in Normandy is yet in a very backward state and cannot be finished for some weeks". Rastrick created a moving scaffold for the masons to continue the work with a single line in use. A report in the Brighton Gazette on 12 August [13] noted that both lines were then in operation.

Opening

[edit]
Southbound view from on top of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, 2009

The Brighton Main Line was opened in two sections because completion was delayed by the need to complete major earthworks, in particular the tunnel at Haywards Heath.[4] The viaduct was officially opened when the section between Norwood Junction and Haywards Heath was opened on 12 July 1841.

By 1846, the viaduct had become part of the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway.[4] In 1923, as a result of the Railways Act 1921, it became part of the Southern Railway network. It remained under Southern's ownership until January 1948, when the nationalisation of the Big Four railway companies formed the publicly owned railway operator British Railways.[4]

Maintenance and restoration

[edit]

The first major restoration work occurred during the 1890s, and was focused on repairs to the brickwork. Engineers of the late Victorian era were concerned that the original lime mortar used in the viaduct's construction was inadequate and the decision was made to replace it with cement mortar. However, the replacement facing brickwork and substandard mortar eventually caused its own failures prompting more expensive repairs later on.[4] This was likely due to the repair work having borne a greater share of the structure's load than intended, resulting in an accelerated failure rate. Poorly bonded header bricks are another probable culprit for its ineffectiveness. Additionally, the parapets and pavilions, although made from Caen stone (a high-quality limestone), have been subjected to heavy weathering.[4]

The Ouse Valley Viaduct in 2007, with the four decorative pavilions visible at each end

By 1956, the damage to the viaduct was extensive but the cost of refurbishment work was deemed too high by British Rail.[4] The degradation was partially a consequence of the structure's long lifespan: when originally constructed in the 1840s, its intended design life was only 120 years.[10] By May 1983, the viaduct had been officially recognised as a Grade II* listed structure.[14][15]

By the 1980s, the eight pavilions present on the viaduct were in such a poor condition that some of their roofs had fallen in and the installation of internal props was required to halt their further collapse.[4] As a consequence of its heritage status, all envisioned alterations to the viaduct need to be reviewed and agreed upon by English Heritage.[10] When British Rail proposed to dismantle the original pavilions and rebuild them using reconstituted stonework, English Heritage refused permissions; accordingly, there was no substantial restoration performed to the viaduct during this period, a decision which British Rail publicly attributed to the sizeable estimated cost of such works. The fabric of the structure continued to deteriorate over the next decade, with sections of stonework falling away from the balustrades and parapets.[4][16]

Starting in March 1996, the viaduct underwent a £6.5 million renovation overseen by the national rail infrastructure company Railtrack and partially funded by grants from West Sussex County Council, Railway Heritage Trust[17] and English Heritage.[16][10] Harder-wearing limestone was imported from Bordeaux to ensure the closest match with the existing Caen stone in the balustrades and pavilions.[18][19] Some of the piers had to be reconstructed because of failures in the Victorian brickwork. The new bricks were handmade in a variety of sizes to suit the existing brickwork and set in sand, cement, and lime mortar; stainless steel anchoring was used to firmly fix the new stone to the old stonework.[4] Throughout the work, one of the lines always remained open while restoration activity was being carried out on the other side of the viaduct. The project, which took more than three years, was completed in September 1999.[16]

From 2023, repairs were being undertaken by Network Rail with various companies. As at September 2024 it was unclear when they would finish.[20][21]

Media appearances

[edit]

The bridge on the cover art of Lovejoy's EP, Wake Up & It's Over was based on the Ouse Valley Duct.[22]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Our Transport Heritage. transportheritage.com, Retrieved: 4 June 2018.
  2. ^ "Under the Arches." The Argus, 22 November 2014.
  3. ^ "Stunning drone photos show off Britain's most beautiful landmarks". The Telegraph. 20 October 2016.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r "Ouse Viaduct, Balcombe." engineering-timelines.com, Retrieved: 4 June 2018.
  5. ^ "Catalogue description Coloured drawings bearing the signature of J U Rastrick, engineer of the company".
  6. ^ Turner (1977), p. 124.
  7. ^ a b "Contract between the London and Brighton Railway and Benjamin Bayliss, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, for railway construction from the Ouse Valley viaduct, Balcombe, to Cuckfield". The Keep.
  8. ^ Body, Geoffrey (1989). Railway of the Southern Region. Patrick Stephens. p. 141. ISBN 1-85260-297-X.
  9. ^ UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h Jefferson, Lloyd. "A critical analysis of the Ouse Valley Viaduct, West Sussex." Archived 23 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine University of Bath, April 2010.
  11. ^ "Meetings of proprietors". The National Archives.
  12. ^ "Meetings of directors". The National Archives.
  13. ^ a b "London and Brighton Railway". Brighton Gazette. 12 August 1841. Retrieved 16 November 2024 – via The British Newspaper Archive.
  14. ^ Historic England. "OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT THE OUSE VALLEY RAILWAY VIADUCT (1366101)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
  15. ^ "Ouse Valley Viaduct." transporttrust.com, Retrieved: 4 June 2018.
  16. ^ a b c Husband, Mark. "Restoration of the Ouse Valley Viaduct." Institute of Civil Engineers, 2010.
  17. ^ Railway Heritage Trust
  18. ^ "Trusting in Trusts: The Railway Heritage Trust: conservation and change". www.ihbc.org.uk. Archived from the original on 3 September 2003. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  19. ^ "Ouse Valley Viaduct (aka Balcombe Viaduct)." bestofengland.com, Retrieved: 4 June 2018.
  20. ^ "Images chart restoration of Victorian viaduct". BBC News. 5 September 2024. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
  21. ^ "Ouse Valley Viaduct -Aw Rail Services". 21 November 2023.
  22. ^ Totino, Marina (12 May 2023). "How Marina Totino made the cover for Lovejoy's new EP Wake Up & It's Over!". Youtube. Livejoy.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Burman, Peter; Stratton, Michael (2014). Conserving the Railway Heritage. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-1367-4493-8.
  • Turner, John Howard (1977). The London Brighton and South Coast Railway. Vol. 1 Origins and formation. Batsford. ISBN 0-7134-0275-X.