Talk:2024 NEET controversy: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Slgrandson (talk | contribs) Assessment (Low): Education, Indian Law, India, Medicine, Law, +banner shell (C) (Rater) |
Toastinopler (talk | contribs) →Use of the word "scam": Reply |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell |class= |
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B |1= |
||
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20240609044354|reviewer=Ratnahastin|oldid=1227916721}} |
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20240609044354|reviewer=Ratnahastin|oldid=1227916721}} |
||
{{WikiProject Education |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Education |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Indian Law |importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject India |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject India |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Use of the word "scam" == |
|||
I suspect that the word "scam" has a different meaning in Indian English than in the rest of the English-speaking world. In any case, it reads like "defraud", "fraud", or "deception", while many of the events described in the article would be better characterized as "theft", "wrongdoing", "mismanagement", "mishandling", "misconduct", "impropriety", "cover-up", or "corrupt acts", depending on how one wanted to shade the meaning. I hope that editors who are trying to make the article more clear for the average reader take a minute to consider using some of the terms I have suggested here. <span style="font-family: Cambria;"> [[User:Abductive|<span style="color: teal;">'''Abductive'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</span> 08:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''The government initially was in absolute denial about any leaks whatsoever. They proudly claimed, boasted how immaculately they conducted such a large exam involving 2.3 million candidates. This obviously was a "deception", hence the students. parents and teachers on social media called it scam and fraud.''' |
|||
:Later, as concrete evidence of leaks were discovered, the government finally accepted that leaks had occurred. Since the leaks were not at an "extreme", (only tens of thousands were affected out of so many) level, and since there was no proof that the government establishment was directly involved on a mass scale, it was decided (by the supreme court) that its perfectly fine to proceed with admission protocols. |
|||
:If this is not a "scam" in the name of conducting exams, idk what is. [[User:Toastinopler|Toastinopler]] ([[User talk:Toastinopler|talk]]) 05:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:12, 7 October 2024
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Use of the word "scam"
[edit]I suspect that the word "scam" has a different meaning in Indian English than in the rest of the English-speaking world. In any case, it reads like "defraud", "fraud", or "deception", while many of the events described in the article would be better characterized as "theft", "wrongdoing", "mismanagement", "mishandling", "misconduct", "impropriety", "cover-up", or "corrupt acts", depending on how one wanted to shade the meaning. I hope that editors who are trying to make the article more clear for the average reader take a minute to consider using some of the terms I have suggested here. Abductive (reasoning) 08:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The government initially was in absolute denial about any leaks whatsoever. They proudly claimed, boasted how immaculately they conducted such a large exam involving 2.3 million candidates. This obviously was a "deception", hence the students. parents and teachers on social media called it scam and fraud.
- Later, as concrete evidence of leaks were discovered, the government finally accepted that leaks had occurred. Since the leaks were not at an "extreme", (only tens of thousands were affected out of so many) level, and since there was no proof that the government establishment was directly involved on a mass scale, it was decided (by the supreme court) that its perfectly fine to proceed with admission protocols.
- If this is not a "scam" in the name of conducting exams, idk what is. Toastinopler (talk) 05:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/09 June 2024
- Accepted AfC submissions
- B-Class education articles
- Low-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- B-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles