Jump to content

Inhalable insulin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
History: adding a missing space
mNo edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Powdered insulin delivered with an inhaler}}
'''Inhalable insulin''' is a powdered form of [[insulin]], delivered with an inhaler<ref name="A Review of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin">{{cite journal |last1=Neumiller |first1=Joshua |title=Pharmacologist |journal=Annals of Pharmacotherapy |date=June 2010 |volume=1231-9 |issue=44 |page=7 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44643382_A_Review_of_Inhaled_Technosphere_Insulin}}</ref> into the lungs where it is absorbed. In general inhaled insulins have been more rapidly absorbed than [[Subcutaneous injection|subcutaneous injected]] insulin, with faster peak concentration in serum and more rapid metabolism.<ref name="McGill2016rev">{{cite journal | vauthors = McGill JB, Ahn D, Edelman SV, Kilpatrick CR, Santos Cavaiola T | title = Making Insulin Accessible: Does Inhaled Insulin Fill an Unmet Need? | journal = Advances in Therapy | volume = 33 | issue = 8 | pages = 1267–78 | date = August 2016 | pmid = 27384191 | doi = 10.1007/s12325-016-0370-1 }}</ref>


'''Inhalable insulin''' is a powdered form of [[Insulin (medication)|insulin]], delivered with an inhaler into the lungs where it is absorbed.<ref name="A Review of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin">{{cite journal |last1=Neumiller |first1=Joshua |title=Pharmacologist |journal=Annals of Pharmacotherapy |date=June 2010 |volume=1231-9 |issue=44 |page=7 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44643382}}</ref> In general, inhaled insulins have been more rapidly absorbed than [[Subcutaneous injection|subcutaneous injected]] insulin, with faster peak concentration in serum and more rapid metabolism.<ref name="McGill2016rev">{{cite journal | vauthors = McGill JB, Ahn D, Edelman SV, Kilpatrick CR, Santos Cavaiola T | title = Making Insulin Accessible: Does Inhaled Insulin Fill an Unmet Need? | journal = Advances in Therapy | volume = 33 | issue = 8 | pages = 1267–78 | date = August 2016 | pmid = 27384191 | doi = 10.1007/s12325-016-0370-1 | s2cid = 25390720 }}</ref>
Exubera, developed by Inhale Therapeutics (later named [[Nektar Therapeutics]]), became the first inhaled insulin product to be marketed in 2006 by [[Pfizer]],<ref name="exubra_fda_approval"/> but poor sales led Pfizer to withdraw it in 2007.<ref name="cnn01"/> Afrezza, a monomeric inhaled insulin developed by [[Mannkind]], was approved by the FDA in 2014.<ref name="fda.gov">{{cite web | url = http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm403122.htm | title = FDA approves Afrezza to treat diabetes|type=News Release|date=June 27, 2014|access-date=July 19, 2016|publisher=U.S. Food and Drug Administration | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140706163846/http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm403122.htm | archive-date = June 27, 2014 }}</ref>

'''Exubera''', developed by Inhale Therapeutics (later named [[Nektar Therapeutics]]), became the first inhaled insulin product to be marketed, in 2006 by [[Pfizer]],<ref name="exubra_fda_approval"/> but poor sales led Pfizer to withdraw it in 2007.<ref name="cnn01"/> '''Afrezza''', a [[monomeric]] inhaled, ultra rapid-acting insulin developed by [[Mannkind]], was approved by the FDA in 2014 and is the only inhaled insulin commercialized at the moment.<ref name="fda.gov">{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm403122.htm | title = FDA approves Afrezza to treat diabetes|type=News Release|date=June 27, 2014|access-date=July 19, 2016|publisher=U.S. Food and Drug Administration | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140706163846/https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm403122.htm | archive-date = July 6, 2014 }}</ref>
__TOC__


== History ==
== History ==
Insulin was introduced by Banting and Best from the [[University of Toronto]] in 1921 as an injectable agent. German researchers first introduced the idea of inhalable insulin in 1924.<ref name="washingtonpost01"/> Years of failure followed until scientists realized they might be able to use new technologies to turn insulin into a concentrated powder with particles sized for inhalation.
Insulin was discovered by Sir Frederick G Banting, Charles H Best, and JJR Macleod from the [[University of Toronto]] in 1921 as an injectable agent.<ref>{{Cite web|title=100 Years of Insulin|url=https://www.diabetes.org.uk/research/research-impact/insulin#:~:text=Insulin%20was%20discovered%20by%20Sir,than%20a%20year%20or%20two.|website=Diabetes UK}}</ref> German researchers first introduced the idea of inhalable insulin in 1924.<ref name="washingtonpost01"/> Years of failure followed until scientists realized they might be able to use new technologies to turn insulin into a concentrated powder with particles sized for inhalation.{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}}


In the 1980s [[Nektar Therapeutics]] developed technology to make insulin into small particles that they licensed to Pfizer; [[Alkermes (company)|Alkermes]] developed a delivery device that they licensed to [[Eli Lilly and Company]].<ref name="washingtonpost01"/>
In the 1980s [[Nektar Therapeutics]], based on work by [[A. Carl Leopold]] on vitrifying proteins, developed technology to make insulin into small particles, technology then licensed to Pfizer. [[Alkermes (company)|Alkermes]] developed a delivery device that they licensed to [[Eli Lilly and Company]].<ref name="washingtonpost01"/>


Once concrete methods were developed, human tests began in the late 1990s.<ref name="washingtonpost01"/> In January 2006, the [[Food and Drug Administration (United States)|U.S. Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved the use of Exubera, a form of inhalable insulin developed by [[Pfizer]];<ref name="exubra_fda_approval"/> it was approved in the UK in August 2006 but reimbursed by the [[National Health Service]] only for people who had problems with needles;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/5245344.stm|title=Inhaled insulin given UK launch|date=August 4, 2006|work=BBC News | access-date=July 19, 2016}}</ref> it was not reimbursed by any US insurer.<ref name="Oleck_2016">{{cite journal | vauthors = Oleck J, Kassam S, Goldman JD | title = Commentary: Why Was Inhaled Insulin a Failure in the Market? | journal = Diabetes Spectrum | volume = 29 | issue = 3 | pages = 180–4 | date = August 2016 | pmid = 27574374 | pmc = 5001220 | doi = 10.2337/diaspect.29.3.180 }}</ref> A 2007 [[systematic review]] concluded that the inhaled hexameric insulin (Exubera) "appears to be as effective, but no better than injected short-acting insulin. The additional cost is so much more that it is unlikely to be cost-effective."<ref name="pmid17767897"/> In 2007, Pfizer announced that it would no longer manufacture or market Exubera. According to Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Kindler this was because Exubera "failed to gain acceptance among patients and physicians".<ref name="cnn01"/>
Once concrete methods were developed, human tests began in the late 1990s.<ref name="washingtonpost01"/> In January 2006, the [[Food and Drug Administration (United States)|U.S. Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved the use of Exubera, a form of inhalable insulin developed by [[Pfizer]].<ref name="exubra_fda_approval"/> It was approved in the UK in August 2006 but reimbursed by the [[National Health Service]] only for people who had problems with needles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/5245344.stm|title=Inhaled insulin given UK launch|date=August 4, 2006|work=BBC News | access-date=July 19, 2016}}</ref> It was not reimbursed by any US insurer.<ref name="Oleck_2016">{{cite journal | vauthors = Oleck J, Kassam S, Goldman JD | title = Commentary: Why Was Inhaled Insulin a Failure in the Market? | journal = Diabetes Spectrum | volume = 29 | issue = 3 | pages = 180–4 | date = August 2016 | pmid = 27574374 | pmc = 5001220 | doi = 10.2337/diaspect.29.3.180 }}</ref> A 2007 [[systematic review]] concluded that the inhaled hexameric insulin (Exubera) "appears to be as effective, but no better than injected short-acting insulin. The additional cost is so much more that it is unlikely to be cost-effective."<ref name="pmid17767897"/> In 2007, Pfizer announced that it would no longer manufacture or market Exubera. According to Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Kindler this was because Exubera "failed to gain acceptance among patients and physicians".<ref name="cnn01"/>


At the time of Exubera's discontinuation, several other companies were pursuing inhaled insulin including [[Alkermes (company)|Alkermes]] working with [[Eli Lilly and Company]],<ref name="bioworldtoday01"/> [[MannKind Corporation]],<ref name="mannkind01"/><ref name="nyt01"/> and Aradigm working with [[Novo Nordisk]]. By March 2008, all of these products had been discontinued because investors all decided to withdrew their fund, except for MannKind's Afrezza product.<ref name="diabetescloseup01"/>
At the time of Exubera's discontinuation, several other companies were pursuing inhaled insulin including [[Alkermes (company)|Alkermes]] working with [[Eli Lilly and Company]],<ref name="bioworldtoday01"/> [[MannKind Corporation]],<ref name="mannkind01"/><ref name="nyt01"/> and Aradigm working with [[Novo Nordisk]]. By March 2008, except for MannKind's Afrezza product, all of these products had been discontinued because investors all decided to withdraw funding.<ref name="diabetescloseup01"/>


On March 16, 2009 MannKind submitted an NDA for their inhalable insulin. In 2011 the FDA denied approval of Afrezza and because the design of the delivery device had changed, the FDA requested additional clinical trials to ensure that people would use it the same way as the earlier versions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://investors.mannkindcorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=792188|title=MannKind Corporation Receives Complete Response Letter from the FDA for AFREZZA(R)|date=January 19, 2011|access-date=July 19, 2016|publisher=MannKind Corporation}}</ref> After conducting further studies, Mannkind submitted a new application, and in June, 2014, the FDA approved Afrezza for both Type I and Type II adult diabetics, with a label restriction for patients having asthma, active lung cancer or COPD.<ref name="fda.gov"/><ref name=USlabel2015>{{cite web|title=US Afrezza label|url=http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/022472s009lbl.pdf|publisher=FDA|date=May 2015}}</ref> In 2014 Mannkind and Sanofi agreed that Sanofi would take over manufacturing and marketing of Afrezza,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Carroll|first1=John | name-list-format = vanc |title=Sanofi fills some big shoes in $925M Afrezza pact with MannKind|url=http://www.fiercebiotech.com/partnering/sanofi-fills-some-big-shoes-925m-afrezza-pact-mannkind|work=FierceBiotech|date=August 11, 2014}}</ref> but Sanofi said it was dropping the effort in January 2016 due to poor sales of $7.5 million in 2015;<ref name=why>{{cite news|last1=Staton|first1=Tracy | name-list-format = vanc |title=Sanofi tried and failed with Afrezza. Why does MannKind still think it can win?|url=http://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/sanofi-tried-and-failed-afrezza-why-does-mannkind-still-think-it-can-win|work=FiercePharma|date=February 10, 2016}}</ref> the companies formally terminated the agreement in November 2016.<ref name=forgive>{{cite news|last1=Palmer|first1=Eric|title=Sanofi forgives MannKind's boatload of debt over failed Afrezza deal|url=http://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/sanofi-forgives-mannkind-boatload-debt-over-failed-afrezza-deal|work=FiercePharma|date=November 10, 2016}}</ref> At the time that Sanofi announced it was dropping the product Mannkind said it would continue alone,<ref name=why/> and it had taken over manufacturing and relaunched the drug by July 2016.<ref name=forgive/> According to results presented at the 2018 meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Afrezza increases the time that blood glucose levels remain in optimal range (70180 mg/dl), reducing both spikes in blood glucose and time in hypoglycemia in adults with Type I diabetes, compared to insulin Aspart.[http://www.mannkindcorp.com/assets/Bergeron-2018-Improved-time-in-range-on-CGM-with-Afrezza-compared-to-insulin-aspart-in-T1DM-Compatibility-Mode.pdf]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Snell-Bergeon|first=Janet K.|last2=Akturk|first2=Halis K.|last3=Rewers|first3=Amanda|last4=Bode|first4=Bruce W.|last5=Klaff|first5=Leslie J.|last6=Peters|first6=Anne|last7=Bailey|first7=Timothy S.|last8=Garg|first8=Satish K.|date=2018-07-01|title=Improved Time-in-Range (TIR) on Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) with Technosphere Inhaled Insulin (TI) Compared with Insulin Aspart in T1D Patients—STAT Study|url=http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/67/Supplement_1/1017-P|journal=Diabetes|language=en|volume=67|issue=Supplement 1|pages=1017–P|doi=10.2337/db18-1017-P|issn=0012-1797}}</ref>
On March 16, 2009 MannKind submitted a [[new drug application]] for their inhalable insulin. In 2011 the FDA denied approval of Afrezza; because the design of the delivery device had changed, it requested additional clinical trials to ensure that people would use it the same way as the earlier versions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://investors.mannkindcorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=792188|title=MannKind Corporation Receives Complete Response Letter from the FDA for AFREZZA(R)|date=January 19, 2011|access-date=July 19, 2016|publisher=MannKind Corporation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160823032632/http://investors.mannkindcorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=792188|archive-date=August 23, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> After conducting further studies, Mannkind submitted a new application, and in June, 2014, the FDA approved Afrezza for both Type I and Type II adult diabetics, with a label restriction for patients having asthma, active lung cancer or COPD.<ref name="fda.gov"/><ref name=USlabel2015>{{cite web|title=US Afrezza label|url=http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/022472s009lbl.pdf|publisher=FDA|date=May 2015}}</ref> In 2014 Mannkind and Sanofi agreed that Sanofi would take over manufacturing and marketing of Afrezza,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Carroll|first1=John | name-list-style = vanc |title=Sanofi fills some big shoes in $925M Afrezza pact with MannKind|url=http://www.fiercebiotech.com/partnering/sanofi-fills-some-big-shoes-925m-afrezza-pact-mannkind|work=FierceBiotech|date=August 11, 2014}}</ref> but Sanofi said it was dropping the effort in January 2016 due to poor sales of $7.5 million in 2015;<ref name=why>{{cite news|last1=Staton|first1=Tracy | name-list-style = vanc |title=Sanofi tried and failed with Afrezza. Why does MannKind still think it can win?|url=http://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/sanofi-tried-and-failed-afrezza-why-does-mannkind-still-think-it-can-win|work=FiercePharma|date=February 10, 2016}}</ref> the companies formally terminated the agreement in November 2016.<ref name=forgive>{{cite news|last1=Palmer|first1=Eric|title=Sanofi forgives MannKind's boatload of debt over failed Afrezza deal|url=http://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/sanofi-forgives-mannkind-boatload-debt-over-failed-afrezza-deal|work=FiercePharma|date=November 10, 2016}}</ref> At the time that Sanofi announced it was dropping the product Mannkind said it would continue alone,<ref name=why/> and it had taken over manufacturing and relaunched the drug by July 2016.<ref name=forgive/> According to results presented at the 2018 meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Afrezza increases the time that blood glucose levels remain in optimal range (74106&nbsp;mg/dl), reducing both spikes in blood glucose and time in hypoglycemia in adults with Type I diabetes, compared to insulin Aspart.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Snell-Bergeon|first1=Janet K.|last2=Akturk|first2=Halis K.|last3=Rewers|first3=Amanda|last4=Bode|first4=Bruce W.|last5=Klaff|first5=Leslie J.|last6=Peters|first6=Anne|last7=Bailey|first7=Timothy S.|last8=Garg|first8=Satish K.|date=2018-07-01|title=Improved Time-in-Range (TIR) on Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) with Technosphere Inhaled Insulin (TI) Compared with Insulin Aspart in T1D Patients—STAT Study|url=http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/67/Supplement_1/1017-P|journal=Diabetes|language=en|volume=67|issue=Supplement 1|pages=1017–P|doi=10.2337/db18-1017-P|s2cid=90171098|issn=0012-1797}}</ref>


==Footnotes==
==References==
{{Reflist|2|refs=
{{Reflist|2|refs=
<ref name="washingtonpost01">{{cite news | first = Justin | last = Gillis | name-list-format = vanc | title = Inhaled Form of Insulin Is Approved | url = https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/977402861.html?dids=977402861:977402861&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Jan+28%2C+2006&author=Justin+Gillis&desc=Inhaled+Form+of+Insulin+Is+Approved | date = January 28, 2006 | publisher=The Washington Post |access-date=2007-10-21}}</ref>
<ref name="washingtonpost01">{{cite news | first = Justin | last = Gillis | name-list-style = vanc | title = Inhaled Form of Insulin Is Approved | url = https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/977402861.html?dids=977402861:977402861&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Jan+28%2C+2006&author=Justin+Gillis&desc=Inhaled+Form+of+Insulin+Is+Approved | date = January 28, 2006 | newspaper = The Washington Post | access-date = 2007-10-21 | archive-date = 2018-04-29 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180429091725/https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/doc/410034884.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan%2028,%202006&author=Justin%20Gillis&pub=&edition=&startpage=&desc=Inhaled%20Form%20of%20Insulin%20Is%20Approved | url-status = dead }}</ref>
<ref name="exubra_fda_approval">
<ref name="exubra_fda_approval">
{{cite press release
{{cite press release
| title = FDA Approves First Ever Inhaled Insulin Combination Product for Treatment of Diabetes
| title = FDA Approves First Ever Inhaled Insulin Combination Product for Treatment of Diabetes
| url = http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/2006/ucm108585.htm
| url = https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/2006/ucm108585.htm
| publication-place = [[Silver Spring, Maryland]]
| location = [[Silver Spring, Maryland]]
| publisher = [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]]
| publisher = [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]]
| date = 2006-01-27
| date = 2006-01-27
}}
}}
</ref>
</ref>
<ref name="pmid17767897">{{cite journal | vauthors = Black C, Cummins E, Royle P, Philip S, Waugh N | title = The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inhaled insulin in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and economic evaluation | journal = Health Technology Assessment | volume = 11 | issue = 33 | pages = 1–126 | date = September 2007 | pmid = 17767897 | doi = }}</ref>
<ref name="pmid17767897">{{cite journal | vauthors = Black C, Cummins E, Royle P, Philip S, Waugh N | title = The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inhaled insulin in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and economic evaluation | journal = Health Technology Assessment | volume = 11 | issue = 33 | pages = 1–126 | date = September 2007 | pmid = 17767897 | doi = 10.3310/hta11330| doi-access = free }}</ref>
<ref name="cnn01">{{cite news| first = John | last = Simons | name-list-format = vanc |title=How the Exubera debacle hurts Pfizer |url=http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/19/magazines/fortune/simons_pfizer_erbitux.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007101916 |date=19 October 2007 |publisher=CNNMoney |access-date=2007-10-21}}</ref>
<ref name="cnn01">{{cite news| first = John | last = Simons | name-list-style = vanc |title=How the Exubera debacle hurts Pfizer |url=https://money.cnn.com/2007/10/19/magazines/fortune/simons_pfizer_erbitux.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007101916 |date=19 October 2007 |publisher=CNNMoney |access-date=2007-10-21}}</ref>
<ref name="bioworldtoday01">{{cite news |title=Alkermes Inc. AIR Inhaled Insulin System Human insulin inhalation powder Began Phase III trial to evaluate effectiveness in improving glucose control vs. injected premeal insulin in 400 patients 4/06 Type II diabetes |url=http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?forceid=413&next=bioWorldPhaseIII_searchDetails&search=1&htsid=0&htmax=1 |date=January 1, 2007 |publisher=Bioworld Today |access-date=2007-10-22}}{{Dead link|date=November 2016}}</ref>
<ref name="bioworldtoday01">{{cite news |title=Alkermes Inc. AIR Inhaled Insulin System Human insulin inhalation powder Began Phase III trial to evaluate effectiveness in improving glucose control vs. injected premeal insulin in 400 patients 4/06 Type II diabetes |url=http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?forceid=413&next=bioWorldPhaseIII_searchDetails&search=1&htsid=0&htmax=1 |date=January 1, 2007 |publisher=Bioworld Today |access-date=2007-10-22}}{{Dead link|date=November 2016}}</ref><ref name="mannkind01">{{cite web |title=Technosphere Insulin - How it works | url=http://www.mannkindcorp.com/how-technosphere-work.aspx |year=2007 |publisher=MannKind Corp| access-date=2007-10-22 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071020032918/http://www.mannkindcorp.com/how-technosphere-work.aspx <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-10-20}}</ref>
<ref name="nyt01">{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/business/16mannkind.html?ex=1352955600&en=d236cde029038835&ei=5088 | work=The New York Times | title=Betting an Estate on Inhaled Insulin | first=Andrew | last=Pollack | name-list-style = vanc | date=November 16, 2007 | access-date=May 5, 2010}}</ref><ref name="diabetescloseup01">Lilly/Alkermes—RIP, AIR Insulin, Close Concerns, Inc. Company Watch, Diabetes Close Up #78, www.diabetescloseup.com.</ref>
<ref name="mannkind01">{{cite web |title=Technosphere Insulin - How it works | url=http://www.mannkindcorp.com/how-technosphere-work.aspx |year=2007 |publisher=MannKind Corp| access-date=2007-10-22 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071020032918/http://www.mannkindcorp.com/how-technosphere-work.aspx <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-10-20}}</ref>
<ref name="nyt01">{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/business/16mannkind.html?ex=1352955600&en=d236cde029038835&ei=5088 | work=The New York Times | title=Betting an Estate on Inhaled Insulin | first=Andrew | last=Pollack | name-list-format = vanc | date=November 16, 2007 | access-date=May 5, 2010}}</ref>
<ref name="diabetescloseup01">Lilly/Alkermes—RIP, AIR Insulin, Close Concerns, Inc. Company Watch, Diabetes Close Up #78, www.diabetescloseup.com.</ref>
}}
}}


{{Oral hypoglycemics and insulin analogs}}
{{Oral hypoglycemics and insulin analogs}}


[[Category:Insulin therapies]]
[[Category:Insulin delivery]]
[[Category:Pfizer products]]
[[Category:Drugs developed by Pfizer]]
[[Category:Sanofi]]
[[Category:Withdrawn drugs]]
[[Category:Withdrawn drugs]]

Latest revision as of 07:56, 5 October 2024

Inhalable insulin is a powdered form of insulin, delivered with an inhaler into the lungs where it is absorbed.[1] In general, inhaled insulins have been more rapidly absorbed than subcutaneous injected insulin, with faster peak concentration in serum and more rapid metabolism.[2]

Exubera, developed by Inhale Therapeutics (later named Nektar Therapeutics), became the first inhaled insulin product to be marketed, in 2006 by Pfizer,[3] but poor sales led Pfizer to withdraw it in 2007.[4] Afrezza, a monomeric inhaled, ultra rapid-acting insulin developed by Mannkind, was approved by the FDA in 2014 and is the only inhaled insulin commercialized at the moment.[5]

History

[edit]

Insulin was discovered by Sir Frederick G Banting, Charles H Best, and JJR Macleod from the University of Toronto in 1921 as an injectable agent.[6] German researchers first introduced the idea of inhalable insulin in 1924.[7] Years of failure followed until scientists realized they might be able to use new technologies to turn insulin into a concentrated powder with particles sized for inhalation.[citation needed]

In the 1980s Nektar Therapeutics, based on work by A. Carl Leopold on vitrifying proteins, developed technology to make insulin into small particles, technology then licensed to Pfizer. Alkermes developed a delivery device that they licensed to Eli Lilly and Company.[7]

Once concrete methods were developed, human tests began in the late 1990s.[7] In January 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of Exubera, a form of inhalable insulin developed by Pfizer.[3] It was approved in the UK in August 2006 but reimbursed by the National Health Service only for people who had problems with needles.[8] It was not reimbursed by any US insurer.[9] A 2007 systematic review concluded that the inhaled hexameric insulin (Exubera) "appears to be as effective, but no better than injected short-acting insulin. The additional cost is so much more that it is unlikely to be cost-effective."[10] In 2007, Pfizer announced that it would no longer manufacture or market Exubera. According to Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Kindler this was because Exubera "failed to gain acceptance among patients and physicians".[4]

At the time of Exubera's discontinuation, several other companies were pursuing inhaled insulin including Alkermes working with Eli Lilly and Company,[11] MannKind Corporation,[12][13] and Aradigm working with Novo Nordisk. By March 2008, except for MannKind's Afrezza product, all of these products had been discontinued because investors all decided to withdraw funding.[14]

On March 16, 2009 MannKind submitted a new drug application for their inhalable insulin. In 2011 the FDA denied approval of Afrezza; because the design of the delivery device had changed, it requested additional clinical trials to ensure that people would use it the same way as the earlier versions.[15] After conducting further studies, Mannkind submitted a new application, and in June, 2014, the FDA approved Afrezza for both Type I and Type II adult diabetics, with a label restriction for patients having asthma, active lung cancer or COPD.[5][16] In 2014 Mannkind and Sanofi agreed that Sanofi would take over manufacturing and marketing of Afrezza,[17] but Sanofi said it was dropping the effort in January 2016 due to poor sales of $7.5 million in 2015;[18] the companies formally terminated the agreement in November 2016.[19] At the time that Sanofi announced it was dropping the product Mannkind said it would continue alone,[18] and it had taken over manufacturing and relaunched the drug by July 2016.[19] According to results presented at the 2018 meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Afrezza increases the time that blood glucose levels remain in optimal range (74 – 106 mg/dl), reducing both spikes in blood glucose and time in hypoglycemia in adults with Type I diabetes, compared to insulin Aspart.[20]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Neumiller, Joshua (June 2010). "Pharmacologist". Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 1231–9 (44): 7.
  2. ^ McGill JB, Ahn D, Edelman SV, Kilpatrick CR, Santos Cavaiola T (August 2016). "Making Insulin Accessible: Does Inhaled Insulin Fill an Unmet Need?". Advances in Therapy. 33 (8): 1267–78. doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0370-1. PMID 27384191. S2CID 25390720.
  3. ^ a b "FDA Approves First Ever Inhaled Insulin Combination Product for Treatment of Diabetes" (Press release). Silver Spring, Maryland: FDA. 2006-01-27.
  4. ^ a b Simons J (19 October 2007). "How the Exubera debacle hurts Pfizer". CNNMoney. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
  5. ^ a b "FDA approves Afrezza to treat diabetes" (News Release). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. June 27, 2014. Archived from the original on July 6, 2014. Retrieved July 19, 2016.
  6. ^ "100 Years of Insulin". Diabetes UK.
  7. ^ a b c Gillis J (January 28, 2006). "Inhaled Form of Insulin Is Approved". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2018-04-29. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
  8. ^ "Inhaled insulin given UK launch". BBC News. August 4, 2006. Retrieved July 19, 2016.
  9. ^ Oleck J, Kassam S, Goldman JD (August 2016). "Commentary: Why Was Inhaled Insulin a Failure in the Market?". Diabetes Spectrum. 29 (3): 180–4. doi:10.2337/diaspect.29.3.180. PMC 5001220. PMID 27574374.
  10. ^ Black C, Cummins E, Royle P, Philip S, Waugh N (September 2007). "The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inhaled insulin in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and economic evaluation". Health Technology Assessment. 11 (33): 1–126. doi:10.3310/hta11330. PMID 17767897.
  11. ^ "Alkermes Inc. AIR Inhaled Insulin System Human insulin inhalation powder Began Phase III trial to evaluate effectiveness in improving glucose control vs. injected premeal insulin in 400 patients 4/06 Type II diabetes". Bioworld Today. January 1, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-22.[dead link]
  12. ^ "Technosphere Insulin - How it works". MannKind Corp. 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-10-20. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
  13. ^ Pollack A (November 16, 2007). "Betting an Estate on Inhaled Insulin". The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
  14. ^ Lilly/Alkermes—RIP, AIR Insulin, Close Concerns, Inc. Company Watch, Diabetes Close Up #78, www.diabetescloseup.com.
  15. ^ "MannKind Corporation Receives Complete Response Letter from the FDA for AFREZZA(R)". MannKind Corporation. January 19, 2011. Archived from the original on August 23, 2016. Retrieved July 19, 2016.
  16. ^ "US Afrezza label" (PDF). FDA. May 2015.
  17. ^ Carroll J (August 11, 2014). "Sanofi fills some big shoes in $925M Afrezza pact with MannKind". FierceBiotech.
  18. ^ a b Staton T (February 10, 2016). "Sanofi tried and failed with Afrezza. Why does MannKind still think it can win?". FiercePharma.
  19. ^ a b Palmer, Eric (November 10, 2016). "Sanofi forgives MannKind's boatload of debt over failed Afrezza deal". FiercePharma.
  20. ^ Snell-Bergeon, Janet K.; Akturk, Halis K.; Rewers, Amanda; Bode, Bruce W.; Klaff, Leslie J.; Peters, Anne; Bailey, Timothy S.; Garg, Satish K. (2018-07-01). "Improved Time-in-Range (TIR) on Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) with Technosphere Inhaled Insulin (TI) Compared with Insulin Aspart in T1D Patients—STAT Study". Diabetes. 67 (Supplement 1): 1017–P. doi:10.2337/db18-1017-P. ISSN 0012-1797. S2CID 90171098.