Jump to content

British Rail Class 70 (electric): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
headings added
 
(139 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{refimprove|date=February 2016}}
<!--[[Image:20002,precleanup.jpg|thumb|right|20002 before the removal of headcode discs]]-->
{{about|the 1940s electric locomotive|the diesel locomotive produced by GE Transportation from 2007|British Rail Class 70 (diesel)}}
[[Image:20002, East Croydon 13.12.67.jpg|thumb|right|20002 at East Croydon, [[13 December]] [[1967]]. By this time it had acquired a central headcode box and full yellow ends. Liveries carried were: Southern Green, Lined Black, Lined Green and finally (late 1960s) British Rail Blue.]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2017}}
<!--[[Image:20003, cjm20003.jpg|thumb|right|20003 emerged just after Nationalisation and sported a revised front end and carried the latest BTC main line black and silver livery, off-set by a large lion on wheel logo on the body side]]
{{Use British English|date=March 2017}}
[[Image:20003,postcleanup.jpg|thumb|right|20003 fitted with rollerblind headcode - post cleanup]]-->
{{Infobox locomotive
|name = Southern Railway Class CC Electrics<br>British Rail Class 70
|powertype = Electric
|image = Eastleigh Works geograph-2383942-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg
|caption = 20002 at the Eastleigh Works Open Day in August 1964
|builder = {{ubl|[[Southern Railway (UK)|SR]] [[Ashford railway works|Ashford Works]] (2)|[[British Rail|BR]] [[Brighton railway works|Brighton Works]] (1)}}
|builddate = 1941, 1945, 1948
|totalproduction = 3
|Britishclass = Co-Co
|uicclass = Co′Co′
|gauge={{Track gauge|56.5in|allk=on}}
|wheeldiameter = {{convert|3|ft|6|in|mm|0|abbr=on}}
|length =
|width =
|height =
|locoweight = {{ubl|''20001/2:'' {{convert|99.70|LT|t ST|sigfig=3}}|''20003:'' {{convert|104.70|LT|t ST|sigfig=3}}}}
|electricsystem = 660–750 V [[direct current|DC]] [[Third rail]] ([[Main line (railway)|mainline]])<br>[[Overhead line|Catenary]] ([[Siding (rail)|sidings]])
|collectionmethod = [[Contact shoe]] (mainline), [[Pantograph (rail)|Pantograph]] (sidings)
|tractionmotors = [[English Electric]] 245, 6 off
|maxspeed = {{convert|75|mph|0|abbr=on}}
|poweroutput = {{convert|1470|hp|sigfig=3|abbr=on|lk=in}}
|tractiveeffort = {{ubl|''20001/2:'' {{convert|40000|lbf|kN|sigfig=3|lk=on|abbr=on}}|''20003:'' {{convert|45000|lbf|kN|sigfig=3|abbr=on}}}}
|trainbrakes = [[Vacuum brake|Vacuum]], [[Railway air brake|Air]], [[Electro-pneumatic brake system on British railway trains|Electro-Pneumatic]]
|operator = {{ubl|[[Southern Railway (Great Britain)|Southern Railway]]|→ [[British Railways]]}}
|operatorclass = {{ubl|SR: CC|BR: 70}}
|powerclass = BR: 7P5F
|fleetnumbers = {{ubl|SR: CC1, CC2|BR: 20001–20003}}
|withdrawndate = 1968
|disposition = All [[scrap]]ped in 1969
}}
The '''British Rail Class 70''' was a class of three [[third rail]] [[Co-Co locomotive|Co-Co]] [[electric locomotive]]s. The initial two were built by the [[Southern Railway (UK)|Southern Railway]] (SR) at [[Ashford railway works|Ashford Works]] in 1940–41 and 1945 and were numbered CC1 and CC2<ref name="MarsdenFenn19">{{harvnb|Marsden|Fenn|2001|p=19}}</ref> - the Southern Railway latterly preferring French practice for locomotive numbers which also gave an indication of the wheel arrangement. Electrical equipment was designed by [[Alfred Raworth]]<ref name=MarsdenFenn19 /> and the body and bogies by [[Oliver Bulleid]]. CC2 was modified slightly from the original design by C. M. Cock who had succeeded Raworth as electrical engineer. The third was built by [[British Rail]]ways in 1948 and numbered 20003.


== Southern Railway nos. CC1 and CC2 ==
The [[British Rail]] '''Class 70''' was a class of three [[3rd rail]] [[Co-Co]] [[electric locomotive]]s. The initial two were built by the [[Southern Railway (UK)|Southern Railway]] to Alfred Raworth's design at [[Ashford]] works in [[1941]] and [[1945]] and were numbered CC1 and CC2 (CC2 was modified slightly from the original design by C.M.Cock who had succeeded Raworth as Electrical Engineer).


Externally, it was clear that the cab design was greatly influenced by the SR's experience with the [[British Rail Class 402|2HAL]] [[Electric multiple unit|electric]] [[multiple unit]] (EMU) design. It has even been suggested that this was because the jigs for the welded cabs already existed and thus made for speedy and cheap construction.{{Citation needed|date=December 2018}} At the outbreak of [[World War II|war]] in 1939, most construction projects were put on hold in favour of the war effort. Construction of CC1 and CC2 was exempted from this, because of promised savings in labour and fuel over steam locomotives. Construction was not smooth, however, and was brought to a halt several times, due to shortage of resources.{{Citation needed|date=December 2018}}
==Southern Railway nos. CC1 and CC2==
After nationalisation in 1948, [[British Railways]] renumbered them 20001 and 20002 respectively.


== British Railways no. 20003 ==
Externally, it was clear the cab design owed a lot to Southern experience with the 2HAL multiple unit design. It has even been suggested that (in true Southern tradition) this was because the jigs for the welded cabs already existed and thus made for speedy and cheap construction. At the outbreak of war in 1939, most construction projects were put on hold in favour of the war effort. Construction of CC1 and CC2 was exempted from this because of promised savings in labour and fuel over steam locomotives. Construction was not smooth however and was brought to a halt several times due to shortage of resource.


The third member of the class, 20003 from new, was built at Eastleigh.<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Tayler|2007|pp=49-61}}</ref> S. B. Warder (later to become chief electrical engineer of the [[British Transport Commission]] and architect of the UK [[25 kV AC railway electrification|25 kV AC]] overhead system still in use today) was, by then, Southern Railway's electrical engineer and he modified the design somewhat. Although counted as the same class, 20003 was markedly different externally from its two earlier sisters, being {{cvt|2|in|cm|0}} longer with flat [[British Rail Class 405|4SUB]]-like cab ends, arguably a simpler (and therefore cheaper) design than the earlier two. Equipment changes, though, added 5 tons to the earlier 100-ton design.
==British Railways no. 20003==


== Head codes ==
After nationalisation in [[1948]], [[British Railways]] renumbered them 20001 and 20002 respectively. Also a third member of the class (20003 from new) was built at Brighton. S.B.Warder (later to become Chief Electrical Engineer of The British Transport Commission and architect of the 25KV AC overhead system still in use today) was now SR Electrical Engineer and he modified the design somewhat. Although counted as the same class, 20003 was markedly different externally to its two earlier sisters being 2 inches (5cm) longer with flat 4SUB like cab ends. Again a suspected economy drive and arguably simpler (and therefore cheaper) design than the earlier two. Equipment changes also added 5 tons to the earlier 100 ton design.


CC1 and CC2 locomotives were equipped with stencil [[Train reporting number|head codes]], but as it quickly became apparent that suitable head codes for freight workings did not exist (nor did the combination of two numbers only at that time, provide the scope) CC1 and CC2 were also fitted with six steam locomotive style discs at each end with 20003 being fitted from new so that standard codes could be displayed. With standardisation came a whole set of new two-character codes with letters as well, and all three locomotives were fitted with roller-blind two-character head codes and the discs removed.<ref name=MarsdenFenn19 /><ref name=MarsdenFenn23>{{harvnb|Marsden|Fenn|2001|p=23}}</ref>
==Headcodes==


== Technical details ==
All three locomotives were equipped with stencil headcodes but as it quickly became apparent that suitable headcodes for freight workings did not exist (nor did the combination of 2 numbers only at that time, provide the scope) they were fitted with steam locomotive style discs (6 for Southern Region) so the standard codes could be displayed. With standardisation came a whole set of new codes with letters as well (still only two characters) and all three locomotives were fitted with roller-blind headcodes and the front ends stripped of their disc codes and greatly cleaned up.


The class soon proved capable performers. The six [[traction motor]]s provided {{convert|1470|hp|abbr=on}}, allowed them to handle both 1,000 ton freight and 750 ton passenger trains with ease.
==Technical details==


=== Booster control ===
The class soon proved their worth. The six traction motors providing 1470hp allowed them to handle 1000 ton freight and 750 ton passenger trains with ease.


Being much shorter than the predominant multiple units, electric locomotives can suffer from a problem known as "gapping" - becoming marooned between supplies at the natural breaks in the third rail and snatching at the couplings whilst moving as they come on and off the power. The latter places undue stress on couplings and has been known to cause separations of a train. Raworth overcame this by having a [[motor-generator]] set with a large [[flywheel]] on the shaft between the two (leading to the nickname "boosters"). The traction current, instead of feeding the traction motors directly, powered a large motor which turned a shaft with the flywheel and fed into the generator. The flywheel ensured the generator continued to turn whilst no current was available from the third-rail, thus ensuring a continuous supply to the traction motors (from the generator). Even while stationary, the Class 70 produced a noticeable droning noise due to the motors turning inside the body. Two of these booster sets were fitted in each locomotive - one for each bogie. It was not, however, sufficient to allow the locomotives to work "off the juice" as the load on the generator whilst under power meant it would quickly consume the stored kinetic energy. They needed attentive driving also, to ensure they were not brought to a halt on a gap and the booster set be allowed to run down. It is obvious that there would be losses throughout the system incurred in the conversion of electrical energy to kinetic and back again but Raworth mitigated this in the control mechanism. Instead of having large, heavily built resistances in the power lines for the motors, the 26 taps on the throttle changed resistances in the field coils of the generator. These correspondingly made the construction much lighter and easily maintained. Instead of "burning-up" unrequired power, the throttle simply altered how much power was generated and the traction motors were wired directly to the generator output.
Being much shorter than the predominant multiple units, electric locomotives can suffer from a problem known as "gapping" - becoming marooned between supplies at breaks in the electrical supply and snatching at the couplings whilst moving as they come on and off the power. The latter places undue stress on couplings and has been known to cause separations of a train. Raworth overcame this by having a [[motor–generator]] set ([[Booster (electric power)|booster]]) with a large [[flywheel]] on the shaft between the two.<ref name=":0" />


The traction current, instead of feeding the traction motors directly through the control assembly, powered a large motor which turned a shaft with the flywheel and fed into the generator. The output of the generator could be combined with the third rail power to reduce or boost the voltage applied to the traction motors. With the generator output polarity reversed, the control assembly could deliver around 1200 V DC by combining the generator output with the 650 V from the third rail to give positive 650 V ''and'' negative 500-600 V - leading to the nickname "boosters". The flywheel ensured the generator continued to turn whilst no current was available from the third rail, thus ensuring a continuous supply to the traction motors.
All three were fitted with a tram style pantograph to allow them to work from overhead [[catenary]] erected in some yards (notably Hither Green, S.E. London) where it was deemed too dangerous to have third-rail with staff constantly at track level - doubly-so in wartime. This pantograph recessed into a cut-out on the roof when not in use to keep within the loading gauge.


Even while stationary, Class 70 locomotives produced a noticeable droning noise due to the booster-set turning inside the body. Two booster sets were fitted in each locomotive, one for each bogie. It was not sufficient to allow the locomotives to work "off the grid" as the load on the generator whilst under power meant it would quickly consume the stored [[kinetic energy]]. They needed attentive driving, to ensure they were not brought to a halt on a gap and the booster set allowed to run down.
==Successor and withdrawal==


There were losses incurred in the conversion of electrical energy to kinetic and back again, but Raworth mitigated this in the control mechanism. Instead of having large, heavily built resistances in the power lines for the motors, the 26 taps on the controller changed resistances in the field coils of the generator. These correspondingly made the construction much lighter and more easily maintained. Instead of "burning-up" unrequired power, the controller simply altered how much power was generated.
Although only three were built, they formed [[prototype]]s for the later [[British Rail Class 71|Class 71]].


=== Other features ===
All three were withdrawn in the winter of [[1968]]/[[1969]] without receiving their [[TOPS]] numbers, although 20001 received BR corporate blue for its final years. None survived to preservation.
A cross-arm [[Pantograph (transport)|pantograph]]<ref name=MarsdenFenn19 /> was fitted to each of the three locomotives to allow them to work from [[overhead lines]] erected in some yards, (notably [[Hither Green marshalling yard]], [[South East (London sub region)|South East London]]) where it was deemed too dangerous to have third rail, with staff constantly at track level, particularly in war-time blackout. The pantograph was recessed into a cut-out on the roof when not in use, to keep within the [[loading gauge]].

The locomotives were fitted with electrically powered [[steam generator (railroad)|train heating boiler]]s to generate steam for train heating allowing them to work passenger trains if necessary.

== Successor and withdrawal ==

The class formed a "proof-of-concept" for booster-based electric locomotives. Although thought of as prototypes for the later [[British Rail Class 71|Class 71]], which used the same concept, the latter differed greatly in its design and construction, being based on Swiss practice.

All three were withdrawn between October 1968 and January 1969<ref name=":0" /> without receiving [[TOPS]] numbers, although 20001 received [[British Rail corporate liveries#Rail Blue|BR "Rail Blue"]] for its final years. None were preserved.

Parts of the electrical equipment including booster generators and flywheels were salvaged and used by [[General Electric Company|GEC]] as load simulators in its test facilities at Preston, where locomotive traction equipment was dynamically tested. Among others, traction systems for the second series of trains for the [[Docklands Light Railway]] were tested on the rig.

==References==
{{reflist}}

===Sources===
*{{cite book|title=British Rail Main Line Electric Locomotives|first1=Colin J.|last1=Marsden|first2=Graham B.|last2=Fenn|publisher=Oxford Publishing Co.|year=2001|edition=2nd|isbn=9780860935599|oclc=48532553}}
*{{Cite book |last=Tayler |first=Arthur |title=The Southern Way: Bumper preview issue |publisher=Noodle Books |year=2007 |isbn=9780955411021 |location=Southampton, England }}

==Further reading==
*{{cite magazine|title=The Southern's 'booster' locos|magazine=Rail Enthusiast|date=January 1984|publisher=EMAP|issn=0262-561X}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
* [https://sremg.org.uk/electric/class70.shtml "Bulleid/Raworth Co-Co Electric Locomotives (Class 70)",Southern Railway E-Mail Group]
* [http://www.semg.org.uk/electric/class70_1.html SEMG page]
{{commonscat|British Rail Class 70}}


{{SR Locomotives}}
{{British Rail Locomotives}}
{{British Rail Locomotives}}


[[Category:Co-Co locomotives]]
[[Category:Co-Co locomotives]]
[[Category:British Rail electric locomotives|70]]
[[Category:British Rail electric locomotives|70]]
[[Category:Southern Railway locomotives]]
[[Category:Southern Railway (UK) locomotives]]
[[Category:Railway locomotives introduced in 1941]]
[[Category:Scrapped locomotives]]
[[Category:Standard gauge locomotives of Great Britain]]
[[Category:Co′Co′ electric locomotives of Europe]]

Latest revision as of 11:59, 17 August 2024

Southern Railway Class CC Electrics
British Rail Class 70
20002 at the Eastleigh Works Open Day in August 1964
Type and origin
Power typeElectric
Builder
Build date1941, 1945, 1948
Total produced3
Specifications
Configuration:
 • UICCo′Co′
 • CommonwealthCo-Co
Gauge4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Wheel diameter3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm)
Loco weight
  • 20001/2: 99.70 long tons (101 t; 112 short tons)
  • 20003: 104.70 long tons (106 t; 117 short tons)
Electric system/s660–750 V DC Third rail (mainline)
Catenary (sidings)
Current pickup(s)Contact shoe (mainline), Pantograph (sidings)
Traction motorsEnglish Electric 245, 6 off
Train brakesVacuum, Air, Electro-Pneumatic
Performance figures
Maximum speed75 mph (121 km/h)
Power output1,470 hp (1,100 kW)
Tractive effort
  • 20001/2: 40,000 lbf (178 kN)
  • 20003: 45,000 lbf (200 kN)
Career
Operators
Class
  • SR: CC
  • BR: 70
Power classBR: 7P5F
Numbers
  • SR: CC1, CC2
  • BR: 20001–20003
Withdrawn1968
DispositionAll scrapped in 1969

The British Rail Class 70 was a class of three third rail Co-Co electric locomotives. The initial two were built by the Southern Railway (SR) at Ashford Works in 1940–41 and 1945 and were numbered CC1 and CC2[1] - the Southern Railway latterly preferring French practice for locomotive numbers which also gave an indication of the wheel arrangement. Electrical equipment was designed by Alfred Raworth[1] and the body and bogies by Oliver Bulleid. CC2 was modified slightly from the original design by C. M. Cock who had succeeded Raworth as electrical engineer. The third was built by British Railways in 1948 and numbered 20003.

Southern Railway nos. CC1 and CC2

[edit]

Externally, it was clear that the cab design was greatly influenced by the SR's experience with the 2HAL electric multiple unit (EMU) design. It has even been suggested that this was because the jigs for the welded cabs already existed and thus made for speedy and cheap construction.[citation needed] At the outbreak of war in 1939, most construction projects were put on hold in favour of the war effort. Construction of CC1 and CC2 was exempted from this, because of promised savings in labour and fuel over steam locomotives. Construction was not smooth, however, and was brought to a halt several times, due to shortage of resources.[citation needed] After nationalisation in 1948, British Railways renumbered them 20001 and 20002 respectively.

British Railways no. 20003

[edit]

The third member of the class, 20003 from new, was built at Eastleigh.[2] S. B. Warder (later to become chief electrical engineer of the British Transport Commission and architect of the UK 25 kV AC overhead system still in use today) was, by then, Southern Railway's electrical engineer and he modified the design somewhat. Although counted as the same class, 20003 was markedly different externally from its two earlier sisters, being 2 in (5 cm) longer with flat 4SUB-like cab ends, arguably a simpler (and therefore cheaper) design than the earlier two. Equipment changes, though, added 5 tons to the earlier 100-ton design.

Head codes

[edit]

CC1 and CC2 locomotives were equipped with stencil head codes, but as it quickly became apparent that suitable head codes for freight workings did not exist (nor did the combination of two numbers only at that time, provide the scope) CC1 and CC2 were also fitted with six steam locomotive style discs at each end with 20003 being fitted from new so that standard codes could be displayed. With standardisation came a whole set of new two-character codes with letters as well, and all three locomotives were fitted with roller-blind two-character head codes and the discs removed.[1][3]

Technical details

[edit]

The class soon proved capable performers. The six traction motors provided 1,470 hp (1,100 kW), allowed them to handle both 1,000 ton freight and 750 ton passenger trains with ease.

Booster control

[edit]

Being much shorter than the predominant multiple units, electric locomotives can suffer from a problem known as "gapping" - becoming marooned between supplies at breaks in the electrical supply and snatching at the couplings whilst moving as they come on and off the power. The latter places undue stress on couplings and has been known to cause separations of a train. Raworth overcame this by having a motor–generator set (booster) with a large flywheel on the shaft between the two.[2]

The traction current, instead of feeding the traction motors directly through the control assembly, powered a large motor which turned a shaft with the flywheel and fed into the generator. The output of the generator could be combined with the third rail power to reduce or boost the voltage applied to the traction motors. With the generator output polarity reversed, the control assembly could deliver around 1200 V DC by combining the generator output with the 650 V from the third rail to give positive 650 V and negative 500-600 V - leading to the nickname "boosters". The flywheel ensured the generator continued to turn whilst no current was available from the third rail, thus ensuring a continuous supply to the traction motors.

Even while stationary, Class 70 locomotives produced a noticeable droning noise due to the booster-set turning inside the body. Two booster sets were fitted in each locomotive, one for each bogie. It was not sufficient to allow the locomotives to work "off the grid" as the load on the generator whilst under power meant it would quickly consume the stored kinetic energy. They needed attentive driving, to ensure they were not brought to a halt on a gap and the booster set allowed to run down.

There were losses incurred in the conversion of electrical energy to kinetic and back again, but Raworth mitigated this in the control mechanism. Instead of having large, heavily built resistances in the power lines for the motors, the 26 taps on the controller changed resistances in the field coils of the generator. These correspondingly made the construction much lighter and more easily maintained. Instead of "burning-up" unrequired power, the controller simply altered how much power was generated.

Other features

[edit]

A cross-arm pantograph[1] was fitted to each of the three locomotives to allow them to work from overhead lines erected in some yards, (notably Hither Green marshalling yard, South East London) where it was deemed too dangerous to have third rail, with staff constantly at track level, particularly in war-time blackout. The pantograph was recessed into a cut-out on the roof when not in use, to keep within the loading gauge.

The locomotives were fitted with electrically powered train heating boilers to generate steam for train heating allowing them to work passenger trains if necessary.

Successor and withdrawal

[edit]

The class formed a "proof-of-concept" for booster-based electric locomotives. Although thought of as prototypes for the later Class 71, which used the same concept, the latter differed greatly in its design and construction, being based on Swiss practice.

All three were withdrawn between October 1968 and January 1969[2] without receiving TOPS numbers, although 20001 received BR "Rail Blue" for its final years. None were preserved.

Parts of the electrical equipment including booster generators and flywheels were salvaged and used by GEC as load simulators in its test facilities at Preston, where locomotive traction equipment was dynamically tested. Among others, traction systems for the second series of trains for the Docklands Light Railway were tested on the rig.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Marsden & Fenn 2001, p. 19
  2. ^ a b c Tayler 2007, pp. 49–61
  3. ^ Marsden & Fenn 2001, p. 23

Sources

[edit]
  • Marsden, Colin J.; Fenn, Graham B. (2001). British Rail Main Line Electric Locomotives (2nd ed.). Oxford Publishing Co. ISBN 9780860935599. OCLC 48532553.
  • Tayler, Arthur (2007). The Southern Way: Bumper preview issue. Southampton, England: Noodle Books. ISBN 9780955411021.

Further reading

[edit]
  • "The Southern's 'booster' locos". Rail Enthusiast. EMAP. January 1984. ISSN 0262-561X.
[edit]