Talk:Operation Valkyrie: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:53, 22 February 2024

Military history: World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Edited, so it redirects to English title version of article. Firepoet (talk) 03:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the...quite interesting commentary out. 98.118.121.233 (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Epitaph" is nothing but speculation.

Never mind speculation it's bloody Nazi propaganda. Or at the very least I'd suspect its author of having a man-crush on Hitler. Someone sort it out? 82.42.238.7 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

a question about chinese version fo operation valkyrie

how can i make a new link for this article from English version to Chinese version .

i had translated a part of operation Valkyrie from this English article to Chinese . i wish that i can make it into Chinese .

； d) 運輸服務及公共設施。

3. 全部武裝禁衛隊將被整合至軍隊中，即刻生效。 4. 執行權之所有者必須負擔秩序及公共安全之維持。特別是需要確保：

a) 通信設施的防護措施， b) 帝國元首保安服務的消滅措施。

任何對於強制軍事力的反抗採取極度殘酷之方式予以瓦解。在此攸關祖國存亡危急之秋，國防軍之統一及完整紀律之維持是至高無上的必要條件。這是為何我使其成為陸軍、海軍及空軍全體司令的責任。借此使之能支持執行權之所有者肩負起授予給他們的困難任務，並賦予他們充足的法理意義在其處置，且保證給予他們麾下之次級階層必要的服從。無論帝國是否得已被拯救，德意志的士兵將依靠他的力量和態度面對這個前所未有的歷史性任務。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.115.0.109 (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Create the page on the Chinese wiki, then add the text "[[zh:PAGE NAME HERE]]" (no quotes) to the bottom of the page, replacing the words "PAGE NAME HERE" with the title of the page on the Chinese wiki. --V2Blast (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The German translation is wrong, it's "Operation Walküre", not "Unternehmen Walküre". Just check the German Wikipedia article (which has the title "Operation Walküre") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.222.108.251 (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me like his article is more about the July 20 plot than the actual operation. I would suggest restructuring the article to talk more about its original intents and history and THEN how it was subverted in the attempt to verthrow Hitler. I dislike Hitler as much as anyone else, but it seems to me that the article is a bit off topic. Plus, the text of the declaration at the end is a bit confusing. Was that the order itself? Or was it perhaps an explanatory note accompanying it? Sadly, I know too little about the topic to rewriite the article myself, but I definitely find its structure confusing. erget —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erget2005 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responding a decade later to your complaints, I have restructured the article to be about the text of the operation, its original conception, and the history of its revision toward a mechanism for supporting a coup. NH8!hAB9aX0n (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Goals

Beyond immediate takover from Hitler long term goals of the plotters should be mentioned(occupation of central Europe, demanding recognition of Nazi territorial conquests in the East keeping up war with Soviets and Poland and so on).--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is addressed in the article on the July 20 plot. NH8!hAB9aX0n (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
+{{WikiProject Military history|class=start |B1=n |B2=n |B3=y |B4=y |B5=n |WWII=y}}
+{{WikiProject Germany|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Pritzker-GLAM|importance=low}}
+}}
 {{Translated page|de|Operation Walküre|version=40867813}}
+== Untitled ==
 Edited, so it redirects to English title version of article. [[User:Firepoet|Firepoet]] ([[User talk:Firepoet|talk]]) 03:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
@@ Line 15: / Line 23: @@
 i wish that i can make it into Chinese .
+；
-摘要
-華爾奇麗亞行動是一個為德意志本土儲備軍發展的緊急維持政府運作計劃，用以在無論何種原因下產生的一般性國家社會秩序崩潰，導致名義上由納粹人民領導的政府失效時，執行和實踐應有的作為，達成維護國內事務的行動。本計劃被德意志元首希特勒認可，且被預期使用於因德意志所屬城市遭受盟軍轟炸，造成的國內法律及秩序崩潰；或使用於因數百萬計來自被佔領國，並工作於德意志所屬工廠設施的強制勞動勞工起義，而導致實體政府崩潰情況下。
-本文
-I.	元首：希特勒死亡
-在政黨中一肆無忌憚之派系領導者已使政權的讓渡得逞, 在爆發如此情況之下，,造成該堅苦掙扎的政權其大後方陷落，並因某些出於一己之私之因素而奪取該政權之權力。
-II.	在此一高度危險的時刻
-帝國政府已宣告一個軍事的緊急狀態做為法律及秩序的維持，並在同一時間轉移執行權和最高國防軍司令的頭銜；於我。
-III.	於此，我下令：
-.	我將轉移執行權及代表權至位於戰區本部之軍區司令。對於位於已佔領的西部區域之國土戰爭，儲備軍司令將歸屬於同步指派之最高司令下。對於位於義大利之西部戰線最高司令；對於位於已佔領的東部區域之西南戰線最高司令；對於位於丹麥和挪威之軍團最高司令及東部地面國防軍司令其指揮的各別區域，其權利將轉移至國防軍司令。
-.	執行權之所有者有權對下列人、事、物進行管制：
-a)	所有國防軍階層及單位，包括武裝禁衛隊、帝國勞工團和工團組織及其區域命令。
-b)	所有屬於帝國、德意志、各省和自治區之公開授權。（特別針對全部司法警察、安全警察及行政警察）；
-c)	所有政府機關任職者、國家社會主義德意志工人黨之子部門及其相關社團；
 d)	運輸服務及公共設施。
@@ Line 49: / Line 39: @@
 It seems to me like his article is more about the July 20 plot than the actual operation. I would suggest restructuring the article to talk more about its original intents and history and THEN how it was subverted in the attempt to verthrow Hitler. I dislike Hitler as much as anyone else, but it seems to me that the article is a bit off topic. Plus, the text of the declaration at the end is a bit confusing. Was that the order itself? Or was it perhaps an explanatory note accompanying it? Sadly, I know too little about the topic to rewriite the article myself, but I definitely find its structure confusing. [[erget]]  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Erget2005|Erget2005]] ([[User talk:Erget2005|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erget2005|contribs]]) 23:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:Responding a decade later to your complaints, I have restructured the article to be about the text of the operation, its original conception, and the history of its revision toward a mechanism for supporting a coup. [[User:NH8!hAB9aX0n|NH8!hAB9aX0n]] ([[User talk:NH8!hAB9aX0n|talk]]) 19:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 == Goals ==
 Beyond immediate takover from Hitler long term goals of the plotters should be mentioned(occupation of central Europe, demanding recognition of Nazi  territorial conquests in the East keeping up war with Soviets and Poland and so on).--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 18:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
+:This is addressed in the article on the July 20 plot. [[User:NH8!hAB9aX0n|NH8!hAB9aX0n]] ([[User talk:NH8!hAB9aX0n|talk]]) 19:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)