Talk:Argumentum ad populum: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Fallacy: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising}}, {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}. Tag: |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising |
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Philosophy|logic=yes |
{{WikiProject Philosophy|logic=yes|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Politics |
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Argumentum ad populum/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Is it really possible to say that Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy while most of the values we accept as a society are indeed "Argumentum ad populum"? --[[User:Comrade-yutyo|Comrade-yutyo]] ([[User talk:Comrade-yutyo|talk]]) 12:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
Is it really possible to say that Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy while most of the values we accept as a society are indeed "Argumentum ad populum"? --[[User:Comrade-yutyo|Comrade-yutyo]] ([[User talk:Comrade-yutyo|talk]]) 12:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Yes. A majority of people believing something is good or true doesn't make it ethical or correct. [[User:Germanater09|Germanater09]] ([[User talk:Germanater09|talk]]) 00:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::See [https://wuzzy.neocities.org/comic/677/ here]. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== ad UNpopularity? == |
|||
Is there a name for the opposite? ie "No one agrees with X." [[User:StephanNaro|StephanNaro]] ([[User talk:StephanNaro|talk]]) 07:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:07, 9 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Argumentum ad populum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Fallacy
[edit]Is it really possible to say that Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy while most of the values we accept as a society are indeed "Argumentum ad populum"? --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 12:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. A majority of people believing something is good or true doesn't make it ethical or correct. Germanater09 (talk) 00:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- See here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
ad UNpopularity?
[edit]Is there a name for the opposite? ie "No one agrees with X." StephanNaro (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class logic articles
- Mid-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia requested images of human behavior