Talk:Hop on Pop: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:35, 1 February 2024

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

I think all the Seuss books that are stubs need to be expanded. Does any one have any interesting information on these books? I think I'll write a plot summarty + spoiler warning. Vampypoo 20:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would make sense for some of the Seuss books, but not this one. This one is just a bunch of unrelated one-page stories. It doesn't really matter though, considering the fact that your post is 7 years old.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.210.64.219 (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons

The Simpsons episode S06E21 has this book as banned in some school (05:18). Why? Alone Coder (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen the episode but I would guess it's just sarcasm. I can't find anything on Google. Mr. Absurd (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Homer speaks, as if with PTSD, of how traumatizing it was when the kids hopped on Pop. This is actually pretty good continuity to the 'Lisa's first words' episode, when Bart DID hop on Homer, in a way that looks like it would hurt. It's strange though, hearing Laura Bush say her kids did the same.. I mean the book is pretty clear: STOP. You must not hop on Pop. I understood that perfectly as a wee lad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.206.153 (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject Children's literature|importance=Low}}
+}}
 I think all the Seuss books that are stubs need to be expanded. Does any one have any interesting information on these books? I think I'll write a plot summarty + spoiler warning. [[User:Vampypoo|Vampypoo]] 20:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
+That would make sense for some of the Seuss books, but not this one. This one is just a bunch of unrelated one-page stories. It doesn't really matter though, considering the fact that your post is 7 years old....  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/187.210.64.219|187.210.64.219]] ([[User talk:187.210.64.219|talk]]) 17:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-What about the sexual connatations?--[[User:Nollieheelflip|Nollieheelflip]] ([[User talk:Nollieheelflip|talk]]) 09:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
+== The Simpsons ==
-	Waz pop and child a bear or wut?
+The Simpsons episode S06E21 has this book as banned in some school (05:18). Why? [[User:Alone Coder|Alone Coder]] ([[User talk:Alone Coder|talk]]) 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
-In my research I intend to investigate the anti-Japanese sentiment triggered by the attack on Pearl Harbor, and how it was reflected through the entertainment and media of the time, such as film, animation, advertisements, and other forms of propaganda.
-	One notable result of the anti-Japanese sentiment sparked by the attack was the internment camps. These too had a major effect on our culture at the time and I plan to investigate what these effects were in schools, businesses, and other relationships.
-	Apart from the rise in anti-Japanese sentiment, there were other changes in the mindset of many Americans following the attack. One of these was the loss of a feeling of definite security. I will investigate how this change affected American identity, economy, media, and society.
-	I plan to get the majority of my research via the internet, and use a considerable amount of primary sources, particularly works of art and entertainment from the time period. I find that primary sources are more valuable due to their relevance and connection to that event and time, as well as being plentiful.
+:I haven't seen the episode but I would guess it's just sarcasm. I can't find anything on Google. [[User:Mr. Absurd|Mr. Absurd]] ([[User talk:Mr. Absurd|talk]]) 14:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
+:Homer speaks, as if with PTSD, of how traumatizing it was when the kids hopped on Pop. This is actually pretty good continuity to the 'Lisa's first words' episode, when Bart DID hop on Homer, in a way that looks like it would hurt. It's strange though, hearing Laura Bush say her kids did the same.. I mean the book is pretty clear: STOP. You must not hop on Pop. I understood that perfectly as a wee lad.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.72.206.153|75.72.206.153]] ([[User talk:75.72.206.153|talk]]) 03:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Summary of Evidence
-	Various documents, as well was written and non written works serve as valuable sources of information relating to the cultural effects of Pearl Harbor.
-Numerous newspaper articles, specifically from 40s era San Francisco news, effectively reflects the opinions and beliefs of the public at the time regarding pearl Harbor and Japanese American citizens.
-	One secondary source I intend to use which provides useful information relating to the American propaganda created as a result of Pearl Harbor is "A Critical Comparison Between Japanese and American Propaganda during World War II" by Anthony V Navarro.
-	Another efficient secondary source is Oracle Education Foundation's articles on the life of Japanese Americans during that time period.
-	Some non written sources from the time period include war propaganda posters and cartoons. During the war many such things were made, almost always presenting the Japanese in dehumanized and stereotypical caricatures. Many of these reflect American beliefs remarkably effectively.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.90.253.52|24.90.253.52]] ([[User talk:24.90.253.52|talk]]) 11:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== The Simpsons ==
-The Simpsons episode S06E21 has this book as banned in some school (05:18). Why? [[User:Alone Coder|Alone Coder]] ([[User talk:Alone Coder|talk]]) 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)