Jump to content

Talk:Federal district: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Further comments
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Politics}}.
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
<nowiki>{{move|Federal district}}</nowiki> lower case, like for all other subnational entitities
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
}}


<nowiki>{{move|Federal district}}</nowiki> lower case, like for all other subnational entitities


[[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] 02:29, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] 02:29, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Line 6: Line 10:
** Moved. [[User:Dbenbenn|dbenbenn]] | [[User talk:Dbenbenn|talk]] 08:14, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
** Moved. [[User:Dbenbenn|dbenbenn]] | [[User talk:Dbenbenn|talk]] 08:14, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)


== merge? ==
== Merger proposal ==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = No consensus to merge. {{nac}} [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 00:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
}}


I think we really need to write a single article that combines the information from [[Federal District]] and [[National capital territory]].
I think we really need to write a single article that combines the information from [[Federal District]] and [[Federal Territory]]. -‎ [[User:Algri|Algri]] ([[User talk:Algri|talk]]) 06:36, 15 May 2005 (UTC) and [[User:Piulin|Piulin]] ([[User talk:Piulin|talk]]) 19:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

* '''Support''', the content in [[Federal territory]] can easily be explained in the context of Federal district, and a merger would not cause any article-size or [[WP:UNDUE|weighting]] problems. --[[User:Thesmp|Thesmp]] ([[User talk:Thesmp|talk]]) 13:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' – both "federal district" and "federal territories" are two different concepts. A federal territory can have a self-government, but a district can't, and merging both may be confusing for some. --[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] ([[User talk:SHB2000|talk]]) 12:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' per above. [[User:Vic Park|Vic Park]] ([[User talk:Vic Park|talk]]) 12:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
{{abot}}


== Argentina ==
== Argentina ==
Line 20: Line 35:
:Can you disambiguate your comments? I really don't understand what you want done. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 22:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
:Can you disambiguate your comments? I really don't understand what you want done. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 22:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


:Note that articles on [[United States federal judicial district]]s and [[Federal Reserve districts]] already exists, and are linked in the relevant sections. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 22:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
:Note that articles on [[United States federal judicial district]]s, [[Federal Reserve districts]], and [[Federal districts of Russia]] already exists, and are linked in the relevant sections. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 22:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

== proposed federal districts ==
are there any proposed federal capital districts in the world? has the canadien government made any proposals to split off ottawa from ontario and make a federal district? including a canadien federal district canada would be subdivied into 14 natioanl subjects instead of the 13 now. could other counties have proposals like this in the works? [[Special:Contributions/76.244.155.36|76.244.155.36]] ([[User talk:76.244.155.36|talk]]) 00:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

== Canada is not the only country without a federal district ==

To the best of my knowledge, there are quite a few [[Federation|federations]] that do not have a federal district ([[Switzerland]], [[Belgium]], [[Germany]], ...). The opening statement in the [[Federal_district#Canada|Canada section]] thus seems invalid. What would be the best way to correct the section? Remove the sentence and rephrase?
[[User:Vinceroni|Vinceroni]] ([[User talk:Vinceroni|talk]]) 15:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

I editied the Brazil section to remove reference to the Spanish language: "The term Distrito Federal, meaning Federal District in <s>both </s>Portuguese <s>and Spanish</s>, ..." Since Spanish is not an official language in Brazil, and is not widely spoken, the fact that these Portuguese words are the same if translated into Spanish is not relevant to a description of the Brazilian federal district and potentiallly misleading. [[Special:Contributions/50.225.219.18|50.225.219.18]] ([[User talk:50.225.219.18|talk]]) 18:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

== The Australian Capital Territory ==

Isn't that a current federal district within the meaning of this article? [[User:Grassynoel|Grassynoel]] ([[User talk:Grassynoel|talk]]) 09:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

:Not sure, but it really depends on what reliable sources say. It is covered at [[Capital districts and territories]], though. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 10:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:22, 9 January 2024

{{move|Federal district}} lower case, like for all other subnational entitities

Tobias Conradi 02:29, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Support. Descriptor, not proper noun, so obviously s/b l/c. Niteowlneils 02:21, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Merger proposal

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I think we really need to write a single article that combines the information from Federal District and Federal Territory. -‎ Algri (talk) 06:36, 15 May 2005 (UTC) and Piulin (talk) 19:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – both "federal district" and "federal territories" are two different concepts. A federal territory can have a self-government, but a district can't, and merging both may be confusing for some. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Argentina

[edit]

The article is wrong about Argentina. Argentina IS a federal republic. The Autonomous City of Buenos Aires elects its own government since 1996, but it is still (since 1880) the Federal Capital of the Argentine Republic, by the Constitution. DelArgonauta (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation necessary

[edit]

Federal Judicial Districts and Federal Reserve Districts in U.S., the Federal Districts in Russia and Federal Capital Districts are four completely different things, although the same word is used. There must be a disambiguation. --80.144.59.203 (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you disambiguate your comments? I really don't understand what you want done. - BillCJ (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note that articles on United States federal judicial districts, Federal Reserve districts, and Federal districts of Russia already exists, and are linked in the relevant sections. - BillCJ (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

proposed federal districts

[edit]

are there any proposed federal capital districts in the world? has the canadien government made any proposals to split off ottawa from ontario and make a federal district? including a canadien federal district canada would be subdivied into 14 natioanl subjects instead of the 13 now. could other counties have proposals like this in the works? 76.244.155.36 (talk) 00:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canada is not the only country without a federal district

[edit]

To the best of my knowledge, there are quite a few federations that do not have a federal district (Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, ...). The opening statement in the Canada section thus seems invalid. What would be the best way to correct the section? Remove the sentence and rephrase? Vinceroni (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I editied the Brazil section to remove reference to the Spanish language: "The term Distrito Federal, meaning Federal District in both Portuguese and Spanish, ..." Since Spanish is not an official language in Brazil, and is not widely spoken, the fact that these Portuguese words are the same if translated into Spanish is not relevant to a description of the Brazilian federal district and potentiallly misleading. 50.225.219.18 (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Australian Capital Territory

[edit]

Isn't that a current federal district within the meaning of this article? Grassynoel (talk) 09:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but it really depends on what reliable sources say. It is covered at Capital districts and territories, though. BilCat (talk) 10:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]