LCF notation: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.4 |
|||
(39 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Representation of cubic graphs}} |
|||
{{For|other uses|LCF (disambiguation){{!}}LCF}} |
|||
[[ |
[[File:Nauru graph LCF.svg|thumb|220px|The [[Nauru graph]]<ref name="DE1">[[David Eppstein|Eppstein, D.]], [https://11011110.github.io/blog/2007/12/12/many-faces-of.html The many faces of the Nauru graph], 2007.</ref> has LCF notation {{math|[5, –9, 7, –7, 9, –5]{{sup|4}}}}.]] |
||
In [[combinatorics|combinatorial]] mathematics, '''LCF notation''' or '''LCF code''' is a notation devised by [[Joshua Lederberg]], and extended by [[Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter|Coxeter]] and [[Robert Frucht|Frucht]], for the representation of [[cubic graph]]s that are [[Hamiltonian path|Hamiltonian]].<ref>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LCFNotation.html LCF Notation]." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Frucht|first=R.|title=A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs|journal=Journal of Graph Theory|volume=1|pages=45–60|year=1976|issue=1|doi=10.1002/jgt.3190010111}}.</ref> Since the graphs are Hamiltonian, the vertices can be arranged in a cycle, which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. Often the pattern repeats, which is indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the [[Nauru graph]],<ref name="DE1"/> shown on the right, has LCF notation [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]<sup>4</sup>. Graphs may have different LCF notations, depending on precisely how the vertices are arranged. |
|||
In the [[mathematical]] field of [[graph theory]], '''LCF notation''' or '''LCF code''' is a notation devised by [[Joshua Lederberg]], and extended by [[Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter|H. S. M. Coxeter]] and [[Robert Frucht]], for the representation of [[cubic graph]]s that contain a [[Hamiltonian path|Hamiltonian cycle]].<ref>{{citation |
|||
The numbers between the square brackets are interpreted [[Modular arithmetic|modulo]] ''N'', where ''N'' is the number of vertices. Entries equal (modulo ''N'') to 0, 1, and ''N''−1 are not permitted,<ref>Klavdija Kutnar and Dragan Marušič, [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0606585v1 "Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order 4''p'',"] ''European Journal of Combinatorics'', Volume 29, Issue 2 (February 2008), pp. 423-438, section 2.</ref> since they do not correspond to valid third edges. |
|||
| last1 = Pisanski | first1 = Tomaž | author1-link = Tomaž Pisanski |
|||
| last2 = Servatius | first2 = Brigitte | author2-link = Brigitte Servatius |
|||
| contribution = 2.3.2 Cubic graphs and LCF notation |
|||
| isbn = 9780817683641 |
|||
| page = 32 |
|||
| publisher = Springer |
|||
| title = Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint |
|||
| contribution-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=bnh2zkuTZr4C&pg=PA32 |
|||
| year = 2013}}.</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Frucht|first=R.|title=A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs|journal=[[Journal of Graph Theory]]|volume=1|pages=45–60|year=1976|issue=1|doi=10.1002/jgt.3190010111|mr=0463029}}.</ref> The cycle itself includes two out of the three adjacencies for each [[Vertex (graph theory)|vertex]], and the LCF notation specifies how far along the cycle each vertex's third neighbor is. A single graph may have multiple different representations in LCF notation. |
|||
==Description== |
|||
⚫ | LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.<ref>e.g. [http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/AddOns/view.aspx?path=GraphTheory/SpecialGraphs/LCFGraph Maple], [http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html NetworkX], [http://igraph. |
||
In a Hamiltonian graph, the vertices can be [[circular layout|arranged in a cycle]], which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. The basic form of the LCF notation is just the sequence of these numbers of positions, starting from an arbitrarily chosen vertex and written in square brackets. |
|||
The numbers between the brackets are interpreted [[Modular arithmetic|modulo]] ''N'', where ''N'' is the number of vertices. Entries congruent modulo ''N'' to 0, 1, or ''N'' − 1 do not appear in this sequence of numbers,<ref>{{citation|last1=Kutnar|first1=Klavdija|author1-link=Klavdija Kutnar|last2=Marušič|first2=Dragan|author2-link=Dragan Marušič|arxiv=math/0606585|doi=10.1016/j.ejc.2007.02.002|issue=2|journal=[[European Journal of Combinatorics]]|mr=2388379|pages=423–438|title=Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order {{math|4''p''}}|volume=29|year=2008}}. See Section 2.</ref> because they would correspond either to a [[loop (graph theory)|loop]] or [[multigraph|multiple adjacency]], neither of which are permitted in simple graphs. |
|||
Often the pattern repeats, and the number of repetitions can be indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the [[Nauru graph]],<ref name="DE1"/> shown on the right, has four repetitions of the same six offsets, and can be represented by the LCF notation [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]<sup>4</sup>. A single graph may have multiple different LCF notations, depending on the choices of Hamiltonian cycle and starting vertex. |
|||
==Applications== |
|||
⚫ | LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.<ref>e.g. [http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/AddOns/view.aspx?path=GraphTheory/SpecialGraphs/LCFGraph Maple], [http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html NetworkX] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302195926/http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html |date=2012-03-02 }}, [http://igraph.org/c/doc/igraph-Generators.html#igraph_lcf igraph], and [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/graphs/graph_generators.html#sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.LCFGraph sage].</ref> |
||
If a graph is represented by LCF notation, it is straightforward to test whether the graph is [[bipartite graph|bipartite]]: this is true if and only if all of the offsets in the LCF notation are odd.<ref>{{citation |
|||
| last1 = Coxeter | first1 = Harold Scott MacDonald | author1-link = Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter |
|||
| last2 = Frucht | first2 = Roberto | author2-link = Robert Frucht |
|||
| last3 = Powers | first3 = David L. |
|||
| isbn = 0-12-194580-4 |
|||
| mr = 658666 |
|||
| publisher = Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London |
|||
| title = Zero-symmetric graphs |
|||
| year = 1981 |
|||
| page = 13 |
|||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=2BHjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA13}}.</ref> |
|||
==Examples== |
==Examples== |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!Name || Vertices || LCF notation |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Tetrahedron|Tetrahedral]] graph || 4 || [2]<sup>4</sup> |
|[[Tetrahedron|Tetrahedral]] graph || 4 || [2]<sup>4</sup> |
||
Line 16: | Line 43: | ||
|[[Water, gas, and electricity|Utility graph]] || 6 || [3]<sup>6</sup> |
|[[Water, gas, and electricity|Utility graph]] || 6 || [3]<sup>6</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Hypercube graph|Cubical graph]] || 8 || [3, |
|[[Hypercube graph|Cubical graph]] || 8 || [3,−3]<sup>4</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Wagner graph]] || 8 || [4]<sup>8</sup> |
|[[Wagner graph]] || 8 || [4]<sup>8</sup> or [4,−3,3,4]<sup>2</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Bidiakis cube]] || 12 || [6,4, |
|[[Bidiakis cube]] || 12 || [6,4,−4]<sup>4</sup> or [6,−3,3,6,3,−3]<sup>2</sup> or [−3,6,4,−4,6,3,−4,6,−3,3,6,4] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Franklin graph]] || 12 || [5, |
|[[Franklin graph]] || 12 || [5,−5]<sup>6</sup> or [−5,−3,3,5]<sup>3</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Frucht graph]] || 12 || [ |
|[[Frucht graph]] || 12 || [−5,−2,−4,2,5,−2,2,5,−2,−5,4,2] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|[[Truncated tetrahedron|Truncated tetrahedral]] graph || 12 || [2,6,−2]<sup>4</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Heawood graph]] || 14 || [5, |
|[[Heawood graph]] || 14 || [5,−5]<sup>7</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Möbius–Kantor graph]] || 16 || [5,−5]<sup>8</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Pappus graph]] || 18 || [5,7, |
|[[Pappus graph]] || 18 || [5,7,−7,7,−7,−5]<sup>3</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|Smallest [[zero-symmetric graph]]{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|loc=Fig. 1.1, p. 5}} || 18 || [5,−5]<sup>9</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Desargues graph]] || 20 || [5,−5,9,−9]<sup>5</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Dodecahedron|Dodecahedral]] graph || 20 || [10,7,4,−4,−7,10,−4,7,−7,4]<sup>2</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|[[McGee graph]] || 24 || [12,7,−7]<sup>8</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|[[Truncated cube|Truncated cubical]] graph || 24 || [2,9,−2,2,−9,−2]<sup>4</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Truncated octahedron|Truncated octahedral]] graph || 24 || [3,−7,7,−3]<sup>6</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Nauru graph]] || 24 || [5,−9,7,−7,9,−5]<sup>4</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[F26A graph]] || 26 || [−7, 7]<sup>13</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Tutte–Coxeter graph]] || 30 || [−13,−9,7,−7,9,13]<sup>5</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Dyck graph]] || 32 || [5,−5,13,−13]<sup>8</sup> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
⚫ | |||
|[[Harries–Wong graph]] || 70 || [9, 25, 31, -17, 17, 33, 9, -29, -15, -9, 9, 25, -25, 29, 17, -9, 9, -27, 35, -9, 9, -17, 21, 27, -29, -9, -25, 13, 19, -9, -33, -17, 19, -31, 27, 11, -25, 29, -33, 13, -13, 21, -29, -21, 25, 9, -11, -19, 29, 9, -27, -19, -13, -35, -9, 9, 17, 25, -9, 9, 27, -27, -21, 15, -9, 29, -29, 33, -9, -25] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Harries–Wong graph]] || 70 || [9, 25, 31, −17, 17, 33, 9, −29, −15, −9, 9, 25, −25, 29, 17, −9, 9, −27, 35, −9, 9, −17, 21, 27, −29, −9, −25, 13, 19, −9, −33, −17, 19, −31, 27, 11, −25, 29, −33, 13, −13, 21, −29, −21, 25, 9, −11, −19, 29, 9, −27, −19, −13, −35, −9, 9, 17, 25, −9, 9, 27, −27, −21, 15, −9, 29, −29, 33, −9, −25] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Balaban 10-cage]] || 70 || [−9, −25, −19, 29, 13, 35, −13, −29, 19, 25, 9, −29, 29, 17, 33, 21, 9,−13, −31, −9, 25, 17, 9, −31, 27, −9, 17, −19, −29, 27, −17, −9, −29, 33, −25,25, −21, 17, −17, 29, 35, −29, 17, −17, 21, −25, 25, −33, 29, 9, 17, −27, 29, 19, −17, 9, −27, 31, −9, −17, −25, 9, 31, 13, −9, −21, −33, −17, −29, 29] |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Foster graph]] || 90 || [17,−9,37,−37,9,−17]<sup>15</sup> |
|||
|[[Biggs-Smith graph]] || 102 || [16, 24, -38, 17, 34, 48, -19, 41, -35, 47, -20, 34, -36, 21, 14, 48, -16, -36, -43, 28, -17, 21, 29, -43, 46, -24, 28, -38, -14, -50, -45, 21, 8, 27, -21, 20, -37, 39, -34, -44, -8, 38, -21, 25, 15, -34, 18, -28, -41, 36, 8, -29, -21, -48, -28, -20, -47, 14, -8, -15, -27, 38, 24, -48, -18, 25, 38, 31, -25, 24, -46, -14, 28, 11, 21, 35, -39, 43, 36, -38, 14, 50, 43, 36, -11, -36, -24, 45, 8, 19, -25, 38, 20, -24, -14, -21, -8, 44, -31, -38, -28, 37] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Biggs–Smith graph]] || 102 || [16, 24, −38, 17, 34, 48, −19, 41, −35, 47, −20, 34, −36, 21, 14, 48, −16, −36, −43, 28, −17, 21, 29, −43, 46, −24, 28, −38, −14, −50, −45, 21, 8, 27, −21, 20, −37, 39, −34, −44, −8, 38, −21, 25, 15, −34, 18, −28, −41, 36, 8, −29, −21, −48, −28, −20, −47, 14, −8, −15, −27, 38, 24, −48, −18, 25, 38, 31, −25, 24, −46, −14, 28, 11, 21, 35, −39, 43, 36, −38, 14, 50, 43, 36, −11, −36, −24, 45, 8, 19, −25, 38, 20, −24, −14, −21, −8, 44, −31, −38, −28, 37] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[ |
|[[Balaban 11-cage]] || 112 || [44, 26, −47, −15, 35, −39, 11, −27, 38, −37, 43, 14, 28, 51, −29, −16, 41, −11, −26, 15, 22, −51, −35, 36, 52, −14, −33, −26, −46, 52, 26, 16, 43, 33, −15, 17, −53, 23, −42, −35, −28, 30, −22, 45, −44, 16, −38, −16, 50, −55, 20, 28, −17, −43, 47, 34, −26, −41, 11, −36, −23, −16, 41, 17, −51, 26, −33, 47, 17, −11, −20, −30, 21, 29, 36, −43, −52, 10, 39, −28, −17, −52, 51, 26, 37, −17, 10, −10, −45, −34, 17, −26, 27, −21, 46, 53, −10, 29, −50, 35, 15, −47, −29, −41, 26, 33, 55, −17, 42, −26, −36, 16] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Ljubljana graph]] || 112 || [47, −23, −31, 39, 25, −21, −31, −41, 25, 15, 29, −41, −19, 15, −49, 33, 39, −35, −21, 17, −33, 49, 41, 31, −15, −29, 41, 31, −15, −25, 21, 31, −51, −25, 23, 9, −17, 51, 35, −29, 21, −51, −39, 33, −9, −51, 51, −47, −33, 19, 51, −21, 29, 21, −31, −39]<sup>2</sup> |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|} |
|} |
||
== Extended LCF notation == |
== Extended LCF notation == |
||
A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work. |
A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work.{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|p=54}} In particular, they introduced an "anti-palindromic" notation: if the second half of the numbers between the square brackets was the reverse of the first half, but with all the signs changed, then it was replaced by a semicolon and a dash. The Nauru graph satisfies this condition with [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]<sup>4</sup>, and so can be written [5, −9, 7; −]<sup>4</sup> in the extended notation.{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|p=12}} |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Line 80: | Line 109: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* {{MathWorld|title=LCF Notation|urlname=LCFNotation}} |
* {{MathWorld|title=LCF Notation|urlname=LCFNotation|mode=cs1}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{citation|author=Ed Pegg Jr.|title=Math Games: Cubic Symmetric Graphs|date=29 December 2003|publisher=Mathematical Association of America|url=http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_29_03.html|access-date=25 September 2010|archive-date=7 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507063023/http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_29_03.html|url-status=dead}} |
||
* [http://bl.ocks.org/1703449 "Cubic Hamiltonian Graphs from LCF Notation"] – JavaScript interactive application, built with [[D3js]] library |
|||
{{Graph representations}} |
|||
[[Category:Graph description languages]] |
[[Category:Graph description languages]] |
||
[[Category:Hamiltonian paths and cycles]] |
|||
[[de:LCF-Notation]] |
Latest revision as of 07:53, 29 May 2023
In the mathematical field of graph theory, LCF notation or LCF code is a notation devised by Joshua Lederberg, and extended by H. S. M. Coxeter and Robert Frucht, for the representation of cubic graphs that contain a Hamiltonian cycle.[2][3] The cycle itself includes two out of the three adjacencies for each vertex, and the LCF notation specifies how far along the cycle each vertex's third neighbor is. A single graph may have multiple different representations in LCF notation.
Description
[edit]In a Hamiltonian graph, the vertices can be arranged in a cycle, which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. The basic form of the LCF notation is just the sequence of these numbers of positions, starting from an arbitrarily chosen vertex and written in square brackets. The numbers between the brackets are interpreted modulo N, where N is the number of vertices. Entries congruent modulo N to 0, 1, or N − 1 do not appear in this sequence of numbers,[4] because they would correspond either to a loop or multiple adjacency, neither of which are permitted in simple graphs.
Often the pattern repeats, and the number of repetitions can be indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the Nauru graph,[1] shown on the right, has four repetitions of the same six offsets, and can be represented by the LCF notation [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]4. A single graph may have multiple different LCF notations, depending on the choices of Hamiltonian cycle and starting vertex.
Applications
[edit]LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.[5]
If a graph is represented by LCF notation, it is straightforward to test whether the graph is bipartite: this is true if and only if all of the offsets in the LCF notation are odd.[6]
Examples
[edit]Name | Vertices | LCF notation |
---|---|---|
Tetrahedral graph | 4 | [2]4 |
Utility graph | 6 | [3]6 |
Cubical graph | 8 | [3,−3]4 |
Wagner graph | 8 | [4]8 or [4,−3,3,4]2 |
Bidiakis cube | 12 | [6,4,−4]4 or [6,−3,3,6,3,−3]2 or [−3,6,4,−4,6,3,−4,6,−3,3,6,4] |
Franklin graph | 12 | [5,−5]6 or [−5,−3,3,5]3 |
Frucht graph | 12 | [−5,−2,−4,2,5,−2,2,5,−2,−5,4,2] |
Truncated tetrahedral graph | 12 | [2,6,−2]4 |
Heawood graph | 14 | [5,−5]7 |
Möbius–Kantor graph | 16 | [5,−5]8 |
Pappus graph | 18 | [5,7,−7,7,−7,−5]3 |
Smallest zero-symmetric graph[7] | 18 | [5,−5]9 |
Desargues graph | 20 | [5,−5,9,−9]5 |
Dodecahedral graph | 20 | [10,7,4,−4,−7,10,−4,7,−7,4]2 |
McGee graph | 24 | [12,7,−7]8 |
Truncated cubical graph | 24 | [2,9,−2,2,−9,−2]4 |
Truncated octahedral graph | 24 | [3,−7,7,−3]6 |
Nauru graph | 24 | [5,−9,7,−7,9,−5]4 |
F26A graph | 26 | [−7, 7]13 |
Tutte–Coxeter graph | 30 | [−13,−9,7,−7,9,13]5 |
Dyck graph | 32 | [5,−5,13,−13]8 |
Gray graph | 54 | [−25,7,−7,13,−13,25]9 |
Truncated dodecahedral graph | 60 | [30, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 30, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2]2 |
Harries graph | 70 | [−29,−19,−13,13,21,−27,27,33,−13,13,19,−21,−33,29]5 |
Harries–Wong graph | 70 | [9, 25, 31, −17, 17, 33, 9, −29, −15, −9, 9, 25, −25, 29, 17, −9, 9, −27, 35, −9, 9, −17, 21, 27, −29, −9, −25, 13, 19, −9, −33, −17, 19, −31, 27, 11, −25, 29, −33, 13, −13, 21, −29, −21, 25, 9, −11, −19, 29, 9, −27, −19, −13, −35, −9, 9, 17, 25, −9, 9, 27, −27, −21, 15, −9, 29, −29, 33, −9, −25] |
Balaban 10-cage | 70 | [−9, −25, −19, 29, 13, 35, −13, −29, 19, 25, 9, −29, 29, 17, 33, 21, 9,−13, −31, −9, 25, 17, 9, −31, 27, −9, 17, −19, −29, 27, −17, −9, −29, 33, −25,25, −21, 17, −17, 29, 35, −29, 17, −17, 21, −25, 25, −33, 29, 9, 17, −27, 29, 19, −17, 9, −27, 31, −9, −17, −25, 9, 31, 13, −9, −21, −33, −17, −29, 29] |
Foster graph | 90 | [17,−9,37,−37,9,−17]15 |
Biggs–Smith graph | 102 | [16, 24, −38, 17, 34, 48, −19, 41, −35, 47, −20, 34, −36, 21, 14, 48, −16, −36, −43, 28, −17, 21, 29, −43, 46, −24, 28, −38, −14, −50, −45, 21, 8, 27, −21, 20, −37, 39, −34, −44, −8, 38, −21, 25, 15, −34, 18, −28, −41, 36, 8, −29, −21, −48, −28, −20, −47, 14, −8, −15, −27, 38, 24, −48, −18, 25, 38, 31, −25, 24, −46, −14, 28, 11, 21, 35, −39, 43, 36, −38, 14, 50, 43, 36, −11, −36, −24, 45, 8, 19, −25, 38, 20, −24, −14, −21, −8, 44, −31, −38, −28, 37] |
Balaban 11-cage | 112 | [44, 26, −47, −15, 35, −39, 11, −27, 38, −37, 43, 14, 28, 51, −29, −16, 41, −11, −26, 15, 22, −51, −35, 36, 52, −14, −33, −26, −46, 52, 26, 16, 43, 33, −15, 17, −53, 23, −42, −35, −28, 30, −22, 45, −44, 16, −38, −16, 50, −55, 20, 28, −17, −43, 47, 34, −26, −41, 11, −36, −23, −16, 41, 17, −51, 26, −33, 47, 17, −11, −20, −30, 21, 29, 36, −43, −52, 10, 39, −28, −17, −52, 51, 26, 37, −17, 10, −10, −45, −34, 17, −26, 27, −21, 46, 53, −10, 29, −50, 35, 15, −47, −29, −41, 26, 33, 55, −17, 42, −26, −36, 16] |
Ljubljana graph | 112 | [47, −23, −31, 39, 25, −21, −31, −41, 25, 15, 29, −41, −19, 15, −49, 33, 39, −35, −21, 17, −33, 49, 41, 31, −15, −29, 41, 31, −15, −25, 21, 31, −51, −25, 23, 9, −17, 51, 35, −29, 21, −51, −39, 33, −9, −51, 51, −47, −33, 19, 51, −21, 29, 21, −31, −39]2 |
Tutte 12-cage | 126 | [17, 27, −13, −59, −35, 35, −11, 13, −53, 53, −27, 21, 57, 11, −21, −57, 59, −17]7 |
Extended LCF notation
[edit]A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work.[8] In particular, they introduced an "anti-palindromic" notation: if the second half of the numbers between the square brackets was the reverse of the first half, but with all the signs changed, then it was replaced by a semicolon and a dash. The Nauru graph satisfies this condition with [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]4, and so can be written [5, −9, 7; −]4 in the extended notation.[9]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Eppstein, D., The many faces of the Nauru graph, 2007.
- ^ Pisanski, Tomaž; Servatius, Brigitte (2013), "2.3.2 Cubic graphs and LCF notation", Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint, Springer, p. 32, ISBN 9780817683641.
- ^ Frucht, R. (1976), "A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs", Journal of Graph Theory, 1 (1): 45–60, doi:10.1002/jgt.3190010111, MR 0463029.
- ^ Kutnar, Klavdija; Marušič, Dragan (2008), "Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order 4p", European Journal of Combinatorics, 29 (2): 423–438, arXiv:math/0606585, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2007.02.002, MR 2388379. See Section 2.
- ^ e.g. Maple, NetworkX Archived 2012-03-02 at the Wayback Machine, igraph, and sage.
- ^ Coxeter, Harold Scott MacDonald; Frucht, Roberto; Powers, David L. (1981), Zero-symmetric graphs, Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, p. 13, ISBN 0-12-194580-4, MR 0658666.
- ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), Fig. 1.1, p. 5.
- ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), p. 54.
- ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), p. 12.
External links
[edit]- Weisstein, Eric W. "LCF Notation". MathWorld.
- Ed Pegg Jr. (29 December 2003), Math Games: Cubic Symmetric Graphs, Mathematical Association of America, archived from the original on 7 May 2013, retrieved 25 September 2010
- "Cubic Hamiltonian Graphs from LCF Notation" – JavaScript interactive application, built with D3js library