Jump to content

LCF notation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.4
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Representation of cubic graphs}}
{{For|other uses|LCF (disambiguation){{!}}LCF}}
[[Image:Nauru graph.svg|thumb|220px|The [[Nauru graph]]<ref name="DE1">[[David Eppstein|Eppstein, D.]], [http://11011110.livejournal.com/124705.html The many faces of the Nauru graph] on LiveJournal, 2007.</ref> has LCF notation [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;&minus;7,&nbsp;9,&nbsp;&minus;5]<sup>4</sup>.]]
[[File:Nauru graph LCF.svg|thumb|220px|The [[Nauru graph]]<ref name="DE1">[[David Eppstein|Eppstein, D.]], [https://11011110.github.io/blog/2007/12/12/many-faces-of.html The many faces of the Nauru graph], 2007.</ref> has LCF notation {{math|[5, –9, 7, –7, 9, –5]{{sup|4}}}}.]]
In [[combinatorics|combinatorial]] mathematics, '''LCF notation''' or '''LCF code''' is a notation devised by [[Joshua Lederberg]], and extended by [[Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter|Coxeter]] and [[Robert Frucht|Frucht]], for the representation of [[cubic graph]]s that are [[Hamiltonian path|Hamiltonian]].<ref>Weisstein, Eric W. "[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LCFNotation.html LCF Notation]." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Frucht|first=R.|title=A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs|journal=Journal of Graph Theory|volume=1|pages=45–60|year=1976|issue=1|doi=10.1002/jgt.3190010111}}.</ref> Since the graphs are Hamiltonian, the vertices can be arranged in a cycle, which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. Often the pattern repeats, which is indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the [[Nauru graph]],<ref name="DE1"/> shown on the right, has LCF notation [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;&minus;7,&nbsp;9,&nbsp;&minus;5]<sup>4</sup>. Graphs may have different LCF notations, depending on precisely how the vertices are arranged.


In the [[mathematical]] field of [[graph theory]], '''LCF notation''' or '''LCF code''' is a notation devised by [[Joshua Lederberg]], and extended by [[Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter|H. S. M. Coxeter]] and [[Robert Frucht]], for the representation of [[cubic graph]]s that contain a [[Hamiltonian path|Hamiltonian cycle]].<ref>{{citation
The numbers between the square brackets are interpreted [[Modular arithmetic|modulo]] ''N'', where ''N'' is the number of vertices. Entries equal (modulo ''N'') to 0, 1, and ''N''&minus;1 are not permitted,<ref>Klavdija Kutnar and Dragan Marušič, [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0606585v1 "Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order 4''p'',"] ''European Journal of Combinatorics'', Volume 29, Issue 2 (February 2008), pp. 423-438, section 2.</ref> since they do not correspond to valid third edges.
| last1 = Pisanski | first1 = Tomaž | author1-link = Tomaž Pisanski
| last2 = Servatius | first2 = Brigitte | author2-link = Brigitte Servatius
| contribution = 2.3.2 Cubic graphs and LCF notation
| isbn = 9780817683641
| page = 32
| publisher = Springer
| title = Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint
| contribution-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=bnh2zkuTZr4C&pg=PA32
| year = 2013}}.</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Frucht|first=R.|title=A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs|journal=[[Journal of Graph Theory]]|volume=1|pages=45–60|year=1976|issue=1|doi=10.1002/jgt.3190010111|mr=0463029}}.</ref> The cycle itself includes two out of the three adjacencies for each [[Vertex (graph theory)|vertex]], and the LCF notation specifies how far along the cycle each vertex's third neighbor is. A single graph may have multiple different representations in LCF notation.


==Description==
LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.<ref>e.g. [http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/AddOns/view.aspx?path=GraphTheory/SpecialGraphs/LCFGraph Maple], [http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html NetworkX], [http://igraph.sourceforge.net/doc/R/graph.lcf.html R], and [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/graphs/graph_generators.html#sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.LCFGraph sage].</ref>
In a Hamiltonian graph, the vertices can be [[circular layout|arranged in a cycle]], which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. The basic form of the LCF notation is just the sequence of these numbers of positions, starting from an arbitrarily chosen vertex and written in square brackets.
The numbers between the brackets are interpreted [[Modular arithmetic|modulo]] ''N'', where ''N'' is the number of vertices. Entries congruent modulo ''N'' to 0, 1, or ''N''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1 do not appear in this sequence of numbers,<ref>{{citation|last1=Kutnar|first1=Klavdija|author1-link=Klavdija Kutnar|last2=Marušič|first2=Dragan|author2-link=Dragan Marušič|arxiv=math/0606585|doi=10.1016/j.ejc.2007.02.002|issue=2|journal=[[European Journal of Combinatorics]]|mr=2388379|pages=423–438|title=Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order {{math|4''p''}}|volume=29|year=2008}}. See Section 2.</ref> because they would correspond either to a [[loop (graph theory)|loop]] or [[multigraph|multiple adjacency]], neither of which are permitted in simple graphs.

Often the pattern repeats, and the number of repetitions can be indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the [[Nauru graph]],<ref name="DE1"/> shown on the right, has four repetitions of the same six offsets, and can be represented by the LCF notation [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;&minus;7,&nbsp;9,&nbsp;&minus;5]<sup>4</sup>. A single graph may have multiple different LCF notations, depending on the choices of Hamiltonian cycle and starting vertex.

==Applications==
LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.<ref>e.g. [http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/AddOns/view.aspx?path=GraphTheory/SpecialGraphs/LCFGraph Maple], [http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html NetworkX] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302195926/http://networkx.lanl.gov/reference/generated/networkx.LCF_graph.html |date=2012-03-02 }}, [http://igraph.org/c/doc/igraph-Generators.html#igraph_lcf igraph], and [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/graphs/graph_generators.html#sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.LCFGraph sage].</ref>

If a graph is represented by LCF notation, it is straightforward to test whether the graph is [[bipartite graph|bipartite]]: this is true if and only if all of the offsets in the LCF notation are odd.<ref>{{citation
| last1 = Coxeter | first1 = Harold Scott MacDonald | author1-link = Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter
| last2 = Frucht | first2 = Roberto | author2-link = Robert Frucht
| last3 = Powers | first3 = David L.
| isbn = 0-12-194580-4
| mr = 658666
| publisher = Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London
| title = Zero-symmetric graphs
| year = 1981
| page = 13
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=2BHjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA13}}.</ref>


==Examples==
==Examples==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
|'''Name''' || '''Vertices''' || '''LCF notation'''
!Name || Vertices || LCF notation
|-
|-
|[[Tetrahedron|Tetrahedral]] graph || 4 || [2]<sup>4</sup>
|[[Tetrahedron|Tetrahedral]] graph || 4 || [2]<sup>4</sup>
Line 16: Line 43:
|[[Water, gas, and electricity|Utility graph]] || 6 || [3]<sup>6</sup>
|[[Water, gas, and electricity|Utility graph]] || 6 || [3]<sup>6</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Hypercube graph|Cubical graph]] || 8 || [3,-3]<sup>4</sup>
|[[Hypercube graph|Cubical graph]] || 8 || [3,−3]<sup>4</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Wagner graph]] || 8 || [4]<sup>8</sup>
|[[Wagner graph]] || 8 || [4]<sup>8</sup> or [4,−3,3,4]<sup>2</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Bidiakis cube]] || 12 || [6,4,-4]<sup>4</sup> or [6,-3,3,6,3,-3]<sup>2</sup>
|[[Bidiakis cube]] || 12 || [6,4,−4]<sup>4</sup> or [6,−3,3,6,3,−3]<sup>2</sup> or [−3,6,4,−4,6,3,−4,6,−3,3,6,4]
|-
|-
|[[Franklin graph]] || 12 || [5,-5]<sup>6</sup> or [-5,-3,3,5]<sup>3</sup>
|[[Franklin graph]] || 12 || [5,−5]<sup>6</sup> or [−5,−3,3,5]<sup>3</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Frucht graph]] || 12 || [-5,-2,-4,2,5,-2,2,5,-2,-5,4,2]
|[[Frucht graph]] || 12 || [−5,−2,−4,2,5,−2,2,5,−2,−5,4,2]
|-
|-
|Truncated [[tetrahedron|tetrahedral]] graph || 12 || [2,6,-2]<sup>4</sup>
|[[Truncated tetrahedron|Truncated tetrahedral]] graph || 12 || [2,6,−2]<sup>4</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Heawood graph]] || 14 || [5,-5]<sup>7</sup>
|[[Heawood graph]] || 14 || [5,−5]<sup>7</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Mobius-Kantor graph]] || 16 || [5,-5]<sup>8</sup>
|[[Möbius–Kantor graph]] || 16 || [5,−5]<sup>8</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Pappus graph]] || 18 || [5,7,-7,7,-7,-5]<sup>3</sup>
|[[Pappus graph]] || 18 || [5,7,−7,7,−7,−5]<sup>3</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Desargues graph]] || 20 || [5,-5,9,-9]<sup>5</sup>
|Smallest [[zero-symmetric graph]]{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|loc=Fig.&nbsp;1.1, p.&nbsp;5}} || 18 || [5,−5]<sup>9</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Dodecahedron|Dodecahedral]] graph || 20 || [10,7,4,-4,-7,10,-4,7,-7,4]<sup>2</sup>
|[[Desargues graph]] || 20 || [5,−5,9,−9]<sup>5</sup>
|-
|-
|[[McGee graph]] || 24 || [12,7,-7]<sup>8</sup>
|[[Dodecahedron|Dodecahedral]] graph || 20 || [10,7,4,−4,−7,10,−4,7,−7,4]<sup>2</sup>
|-
|-
|Truncated [[cube|cubical]] graph || 24 || [2,9,-2,2,-9,-2]<sup>4</sup>
|[[McGee graph]] || 24 || [12,7,−7]<sup>8</sup>
|-
|-
|Truncated [[octahedron|octahedral]] graph || 24 || [3,-7,7,-3]<sup>6</sup>
|[[Truncated cube|Truncated cubical]] graph || 24 || [2,9,−2,2,−9,−2]<sup>4</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Nauru graph]] || 24 || [5,-9,7,-7,9,-5]<sup>4</sup>
|[[Truncated octahedron|Truncated octahedral]] graph || 24 || [3,−7,7,−3]<sup>6</sup>
|-
|-
|[[F26A graph]] || 26 || [-7, 7]<sup>13</sup>
|[[Nauru graph]] || 24 || [5,−9,7,−7,9,−5]<sup>4</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Tutte–Coxeter graph]] || 30 || [-13,-9,7,-7,9,13]<sup>5</sup>
|[[F26A graph]] || 26 || [−7, 7]<sup>13</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Dyck graph]] || 32 || [5,-5,13,-13]<sup>8</sup>
|[[Tutte–Coxeter graph]] || 30 || [−13,−9,7,−7,9,13]<sup>5</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Gray graph]] || 54 || [-25,7,-7,13,-13,25]<sup>9</sup>
|[[Dyck graph]] || 32 || [5,−5,13,−13]<sup>8</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Gray graph]] || 54 || [−25,7,−7,13,−13,25]<sup>9</sup>
|Truncated [[dodecahedron|dodecahedral]] graph || 60 || [30, -2, 2, 21, -2, 2, 12, -2, 2, -12, -2, 2, -21, -2, 2, 30, -2, 2, -12, -2, 2, 21, -2, 2, -21, -2, 2, 12, -2, 2]<sup>2</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Truncated dodecahedron|Truncated dodecahedral]] graph || 60 || [30, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 30, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2]<sup>2</sup>
|[[Harries graph]] || 70 || [-29,-19,-13,13,21,-27,27,33,-13,13,19,-21,-33,29]<sup>5</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Harries graph]] || 70 || [−29,−19,−13,13,21,−27,27,33,−13,13,19,−21,−33,29]<sup>5</sup>
|[[Harries–Wong graph]] || 70 || [9, 25, 31, -17, 17, 33, 9, -29, -15, -9, 9, 25, -25, 29, 17, -9, 9, -27, 35, -9, 9, -17, 21, 27, -29, -9, -25, 13, 19, -9, -33, -17, 19, -31, 27, 11, -25, 29, -33, 13, -13, 21, -29, -21, 25, 9, -11, -19, 29, 9, -27, -19, -13, -35, -9, 9, 17, 25, -9, 9, 27, -27, -21, 15, -9, 29, -29, 33, -9, -25]
|-
|-
|[[Balaban 10-cage]] || 70 || [-9, -25, -19, 29, 13, 35, -13, -29, 19, 25, 9, -29, 29, 17, 33, 21, 9,-13, -31, -9, 25, 17, 9, -31, 27, -9, 17, -19, -29, 27, -17, -9, -29, 33, -25,25, -21, 17, -17, 29, 35, -29, 17, -17, 21, -25, 25, -33, 29, 9, 17, -27, 29, 19, -17, 9, -27, 31, -9, -17, -25, 9, 31, 13, -9, -21, -33, -17, -29, 29]
|[[Harries–Wong graph]] || 70 || [9, 25, 31, −17, 17, 33, 9, −29, −15, −9, 9, 25, −25, 29, 17, −9, 9, −27, 35, −9, 9, −17, 21, 27, −29, −9, −25, 13, 19, −9, −33, −17, 19, −31, 27, 11, −25, 29, −33, 13, −13, 21, −29, −21, 25, 9, −11, −19, 29, 9, −27, −19, −13, −35, −9, 9, 17, 25, −9, 9, 27, −27, −21, 15, −9, 29, −29, 33, −9, −25]
|-
|-
|[[Balaban 10-cage]] || 70 || [−9, −25, −19, 29, 13, 35, −13, −29, 19, 25, 9, −29, 29, 17, 33, 21, 9,−13, −31, −9, 25, 17, 9, −31, 27, −9, 17, −19, −29, 27, −17, −9, −29, 33, −25,25, −21, 17, −17, 29, 35, −29, 17, −17, 21, −25, 25, −33, 29, 9, 17, −27, 29, 19, −17, 9, −27, 31, −9, −17, −25, 9, 31, 13, −9, −21, −33, −17, −29, 29]
|[[Foster graph]] || 90 || [17,-9,37,-37,9,-17]<sup>15</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Foster graph]] || 90 || [17,−9,37,−37,9,−17]<sup>15</sup>
|[[Biggs-Smith graph]] || 102 || [16, 24, -38, 17, 34, 48, -19, 41, -35, 47, -20, 34, -36, 21, 14, 48, -16, -36, -43, 28, -17, 21, 29, -43, 46, -24, 28, -38, -14, -50, -45, 21, 8, 27, -21, 20, -37, 39, -34, -44, -8, 38, -21, 25, 15, -34, 18, -28, -41, 36, 8, -29, -21, -48, -28, -20, -47, 14, -8, -15, -27, 38, 24, -48, -18, 25, 38, 31, -25, 24, -46, -14, 28, 11, 21, 35, -39, 43, 36, -38, 14, 50, 43, 36, -11, -36, -24, 45, 8, 19, -25, 38, 20, -24, -14, -21, -8, 44, -31, -38, -28, 37]
|-
|-
|[[Balaban 11-cage]] || 112 || [44, 26, -47, -15, 35, -39, 11, -27, 38, -37, 43, 14, 28, 51, -29, -16, 41, -11, -26, 15, 22, -51, -35, 36, 52, -14, -33, -26, -46, 52, 26, 16, 43, 33, -15, 17, -53, 23, -42, -35, -28, 30, -22, 45, -44, 16, -38, -16, 50, -55, 20, 28, -17, -43, 47, 34, -26, -41, 11, -36, -23, -16, 41, 17, -51, 26, -33, 47, 17, -11, -20, -30, 21, 29, 36, -43, -52, 10, 39, -28, -17, -52, 51, 26, 37, -17, 10, -10, -45, -34, 17, -26, 27, -21, 46, 53, -10, 29, -50, 35, 15, -47, -29, -41, 26, 33, 55, -17, 42, -26, -36, 16]
|[[Biggs–Smith graph]] || 102 || [16, 24, −38, 17, 34, 48, −19, 41, −35, 47, −20, 34, −36, 21, 14, 48, −16, −36, −43, 28, −17, 21, 29, −43, 46, −24, 28, −38, −14, −50, −45, 21, 8, 27, −21, 20, −37, 39, −34, −44, −8, 38, −21, 25, 15, −34, 18, −28, −41, 36, 8, −29, −21, −48, −28, −20, −47, 14, −8, −15, −27, 38, 24, −48, −18, 25, 38, 31, −25, 24, −46, −14, 28, 11, 21, 35, −39, 43, 36, −38, 14, 50, 43, 36, −11, −36, −24, 45, 8, 19, −25, 38, 20, −24, −14, −21, −8, 44, −31, −38, −28, 37]
|-
|-
|[[Ljubljana graph]] || 112 || [47, -23, -31, 39, 25, -21, -31, -41, 25, 15, 29, -41, -19, 15, -49, 33, 39, -35, -21, 17, -33, 49, 41, 31, -15, -29, 41, 31, -15, -25, 21, 31, -51, -25, 23, 9, -17, 51, 35, -29, 21, -51, -39, 33, -9, -51, 51, -47, -33, 19, 51, -21, 29, 21, -31, -39]<sup>2</sup>
|[[Balaban 11-cage]] || 112 || [44, 26, −47, −15, 35, −39, 11, −27, 38, −37, 43, 14, 28, 51, −29, −16, 41, −11, −26, 15, 22, −51, −35, 36, 52, −14, −33, −26, −46, 52, 26, 16, 43, 33, −15, 17, −53, 23, −42, −35, −28, 30, −22, 45, −44, 16, −38, −16, 50, −55, 20, 28, −17, −43, 47, 34, −26, −41, 11, −36, −23, −16, 41, 17, −51, 26, −33, 47, 17, −11, −20, −30, 21, 29, 36, −43, −52, 10, 39, −28, −17, −52, 51, 26, 37, −17, 10, −10, −45, −34, 17, −26, 27, −21, 46, 53, −10, 29, −50, 35, 15, −47, −29, −41, 26, 33, 55, −17, 42, −26, −36, 16]
|-
|-
|[[Ljubljana graph]] || 112 || [47, −23, −31, 39, 25, −21, −31, −41, 25, 15, 29, −41, −19, 15, −49, 33, 39, −35, −21, 17, −33, 49, 41, 31, −15, −29, 41, 31, −15, −25, 21, 31, −51, −25, 23, 9, −17, 51, 35, −29, 21, −51, −39, 33, −9, −51, 51, −47, −33, 19, 51, −21, 29, 21, −31, −39]<sup>2</sup>
|[[Tutte 12-cage]] || 126 || [17, 27, -13, -59, -35, 35, -11, 13, -53, 53, -27, 21, 57, 11, -21, -57, 59, -17]<sup>7</sup>
|-
|[[Tutte 12-cage]] || 126 || [17, 27, −13, −59, −35, 35, −11, 13, −53, 53, −27, 21, 57, 11, −21, −57, 59, −17]<sup>7</sup>
|}
|}


== Extended LCF notation ==
== Extended LCF notation ==
A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work.<ref>{{cite book |first1=H. S. M. |last1=Coxeter |first2=R. |last2=Frucht |first3=D. L. |last3=Powers |title=Zero-symmetric graphs: trivalent graphical regular representations of groups |year=1981 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=012-19458-04 |pages=54}}</ref> In particular, they introduced an "anti-palindromic" notation: if the second half of the numbers between the square brackets was the reverse of the first half, but with all the signs changed, then it was replaced by a semicolon and a dash. The Nauru graph satisfies this condition with [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;&minus;7,&nbsp;9,&nbsp;&minus;5]<sup>4</sup>, and so can be written [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7;&nbsp;&minus;]<sup>4</sup> in the extended notation.<ref>Coxeter, Frucht, Powers, p. 12.</ref>
A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work.{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|p=54}} In particular, they introduced an "anti-palindromic" notation: if the second half of the numbers between the square brackets was the reverse of the first half, but with all the signs changed, then it was replaced by a semicolon and a dash. The Nauru graph satisfies this condition with [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;&minus;7,&nbsp;9,&nbsp;&minus;5]<sup>4</sup>, and so can be written [5,&nbsp;&minus;9,&nbsp;7;&nbsp;&minus;]<sup>4</sup> in the extended notation.{{sfnp|Coxeter|Frucht|Powers|1981|p=12}}


== References ==
== References ==
Line 80: Line 109:


==External links==
==External links==
* {{MathWorld|title=LCF Notation|urlname=LCFNotation}}
* {{MathWorld|title=LCF Notation|urlname=LCFNotation|mode=cs1}}
* {{cite web|author=Ed Pegg Jr.|title=Math Games: Cubic Symmetric Graphs|date=29 December 2003|publisher=Mathematical Association of America|url=http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_29_03.html}}
* {{citation|author=Ed Pegg Jr.|title=Math Games: Cubic Symmetric Graphs|date=29 December 2003|publisher=Mathematical Association of America|url=http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_29_03.html|access-date=25 September 2010|archive-date=7 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507063023/http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames_12_29_03.html|url-status=dead}}
* [http://bl.ocks.org/1703449 "Cubic Hamiltonian Graphs from LCF Notation"] – JavaScript interactive application, built with [[D3js]] library


{{Graph representations}}


[[Category:Graph description languages]]
[[Category:Graph description languages]]
[[Category:Hamiltonian paths and cycles]]

[[de:LCF-Notation]]

Latest revision as of 07:53, 29 May 2023

The Nauru graph[1] has LCF notation [5, –9, 7, –7, 9, –5]4.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, LCF notation or LCF code is a notation devised by Joshua Lederberg, and extended by H. S. M. Coxeter and Robert Frucht, for the representation of cubic graphs that contain a Hamiltonian cycle.[2][3] The cycle itself includes two out of the three adjacencies for each vertex, and the LCF notation specifies how far along the cycle each vertex's third neighbor is. A single graph may have multiple different representations in LCF notation.

Description

[edit]

In a Hamiltonian graph, the vertices can be arranged in a cycle, which accounts for two edges per vertex. The third edge from each vertex can then be described by how many positions clockwise (positive) or counter-clockwise (negative) it leads. The basic form of the LCF notation is just the sequence of these numbers of positions, starting from an arbitrarily chosen vertex and written in square brackets. The numbers between the brackets are interpreted modulo N, where N is the number of vertices. Entries congruent modulo N to 0, 1, or N − 1 do not appear in this sequence of numbers,[4] because they would correspond either to a loop or multiple adjacency, neither of which are permitted in simple graphs.

Often the pattern repeats, and the number of repetitions can be indicated by a superscript in the notation. For example, the Nauru graph,[1] shown on the right, has four repetitions of the same six offsets, and can be represented by the LCF notation [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]4. A single graph may have multiple different LCF notations, depending on the choices of Hamiltonian cycle and starting vertex.

Applications

[edit]

LCF notation is useful in publishing concise descriptions of Hamiltonian cubic graphs, such as the examples below. In addition, some software packages for manipulating graphs include utilities for creating a graph from its LCF notation.[5]

If a graph is represented by LCF notation, it is straightforward to test whether the graph is bipartite: this is true if and only if all of the offsets in the LCF notation are odd.[6]

Examples

[edit]
Name Vertices LCF notation
Tetrahedral graph 4 [2]4
Utility graph 6 [3]6
Cubical graph 8 [3,−3]4
Wagner graph 8 [4]8 or [4,−3,3,4]2
Bidiakis cube 12 [6,4,−4]4 or [6,−3,3,6,3,−3]2 or [−3,6,4,−4,6,3,−4,6,−3,3,6,4]
Franklin graph 12 [5,−5]6 or [−5,−3,3,5]3
Frucht graph 12 [−5,−2,−4,2,5,−2,2,5,−2,−5,4,2]
Truncated tetrahedral graph 12 [2,6,−2]4
Heawood graph 14 [5,−5]7
Möbius–Kantor graph 16 [5,−5]8
Pappus graph 18 [5,7,−7,7,−7,−5]3
Smallest zero-symmetric graph[7] 18 [5,−5]9
Desargues graph 20 [5,−5,9,−9]5
Dodecahedral graph 20 [10,7,4,−4,−7,10,−4,7,−7,4]2
McGee graph 24 [12,7,−7]8
Truncated cubical graph 24 [2,9,−2,2,−9,−2]4
Truncated octahedral graph 24 [3,−7,7,−3]6
Nauru graph 24 [5,−9,7,−7,9,−5]4
F26A graph 26 [−7, 7]13
Tutte–Coxeter graph 30 [−13,−9,7,−7,9,13]5
Dyck graph 32 [5,−5,13,−13]8
Gray graph 54 [−25,7,−7,13,−13,25]9
Truncated dodecahedral graph 60 [30, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 30, −2, 2, −12, −2, 2, 21, −2, 2, −21, −2, 2, 12, −2, 2]2
Harries graph 70 [−29,−19,−13,13,21,−27,27,33,−13,13,19,−21,−33,29]5
Harries–Wong graph 70 [9, 25, 31, −17, 17, 33, 9, −29, −15, −9, 9, 25, −25, 29, 17, −9, 9, −27, 35, −9, 9, −17, 21, 27, −29, −9, −25, 13, 19, −9, −33, −17, 19, −31, 27, 11, −25, 29, −33, 13, −13, 21, −29, −21, 25, 9, −11, −19, 29, 9, −27, −19, −13, −35, −9, 9, 17, 25, −9, 9, 27, −27, −21, 15, −9, 29, −29, 33, −9, −25]
Balaban 10-cage 70 [−9, −25, −19, 29, 13, 35, −13, −29, 19, 25, 9, −29, 29, 17, 33, 21, 9,−13, −31, −9, 25, 17, 9, −31, 27, −9, 17, −19, −29, 27, −17, −9, −29, 33, −25,25, −21, 17, −17, 29, 35, −29, 17, −17, 21, −25, 25, −33, 29, 9, 17, −27, 29, 19, −17, 9, −27, 31, −9, −17, −25, 9, 31, 13, −9, −21, −33, −17, −29, 29]
Foster graph 90 [17,−9,37,−37,9,−17]15
Biggs–Smith graph 102 [16, 24, −38, 17, 34, 48, −19, 41, −35, 47, −20, 34, −36, 21, 14, 48, −16, −36, −43, 28, −17, 21, 29, −43, 46, −24, 28, −38, −14, −50, −45, 21, 8, 27, −21, 20, −37, 39, −34, −44, −8, 38, −21, 25, 15, −34, 18, −28, −41, 36, 8, −29, −21, −48, −28, −20, −47, 14, −8, −15, −27, 38, 24, −48, −18, 25, 38, 31, −25, 24, −46, −14, 28, 11, 21, 35, −39, 43, 36, −38, 14, 50, 43, 36, −11, −36, −24, 45, 8, 19, −25, 38, 20, −24, −14, −21, −8, 44, −31, −38, −28, 37]
Balaban 11-cage 112 [44, 26, −47, −15, 35, −39, 11, −27, 38, −37, 43, 14, 28, 51, −29, −16, 41, −11, −26, 15, 22, −51, −35, 36, 52, −14, −33, −26, −46, 52, 26, 16, 43, 33, −15, 17, −53, 23, −42, −35, −28, 30, −22, 45, −44, 16, −38, −16, 50, −55, 20, 28, −17, −43, 47, 34, −26, −41, 11, −36, −23, −16, 41, 17, −51, 26, −33, 47, 17, −11, −20, −30, 21, 29, 36, −43, −52, 10, 39, −28, −17, −52, 51, 26, 37, −17, 10, −10, −45, −34, 17, −26, 27, −21, 46, 53, −10, 29, −50, 35, 15, −47, −29, −41, 26, 33, 55, −17, 42, −26, −36, 16]
Ljubljana graph 112 [47, −23, −31, 39, 25, −21, −31, −41, 25, 15, 29, −41, −19, 15, −49, 33, 39, −35, −21, 17, −33, 49, 41, 31, −15, −29, 41, 31, −15, −25, 21, 31, −51, −25, 23, 9, −17, 51, 35, −29, 21, −51, −39, 33, −9, −51, 51, −47, −33, 19, 51, −21, 29, 21, −31, −39]2
Tutte 12-cage 126 [17, 27, −13, −59, −35, 35, −11, 13, −53, 53, −27, 21, 57, 11, −21, −57, 59, −17]7

Extended LCF notation

[edit]

A more complex extended version of LCF notation was provided by Coxeter, Frucht, and Powers in later work.[8] In particular, they introduced an "anti-palindromic" notation: if the second half of the numbers between the square brackets was the reverse of the first half, but with all the signs changed, then it was replaced by a semicolon and a dash. The Nauru graph satisfies this condition with [5, −9, 7, −7, 9, −5]4, and so can be written [5, −9, 7; −]4 in the extended notation.[9]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Eppstein, D., The many faces of the Nauru graph, 2007.
  2. ^ Pisanski, Tomaž; Servatius, Brigitte (2013), "2.3.2 Cubic graphs and LCF notation", Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint, Springer, p. 32, ISBN 9780817683641.
  3. ^ Frucht, R. (1976), "A canonical representation of trivalent Hamiltonian graphs", Journal of Graph Theory, 1 (1): 45–60, doi:10.1002/jgt.3190010111, MR 0463029.
  4. ^ Kutnar, Klavdija; Marušič, Dragan (2008), "Hamiltonicity of vertex-transitive graphs of order 4p", European Journal of Combinatorics, 29 (2): 423–438, arXiv:math/0606585, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2007.02.002, MR 2388379. See Section 2.
  5. ^ e.g. Maple, NetworkX Archived 2012-03-02 at the Wayback Machine, igraph, and sage.
  6. ^ Coxeter, Harold Scott MacDonald; Frucht, Roberto; Powers, David L. (1981), Zero-symmetric graphs, Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, p. 13, ISBN 0-12-194580-4, MR 0658666.
  7. ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), Fig. 1.1, p. 5.
  8. ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), p. 54.
  9. ^ Coxeter, Frucht & Powers (1981), p. 12.
[edit]