Panther–Wotan line: Difference between revisions
m Disambiguating links to Invasion of Italy (link changed to German invasion of Italy) using DisamAssist. |
Estopedist1 (talk | contribs) not country-specific:−Category:World War II sites in Estonia; −Category:World War II sites in Ukraine; −Category:World War II sites in Belarus using HotCat |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|German defense line in WWII between Germany and the USSR}} |
|||
{{ |
{{more citations needed|date=September 2016}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
[[File:Map of dnieper battle grand.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Map of dnieper battle grand.jpg|thumb|Map of the Eastern Front in 1943, showing the Panther–Wotan line in red]] |
||
| ⚫ | The '''Panther–Wotan line''', or '''''Ostwall''''' in German, was a [[defense line|defensive line]] partially built by the German [[Wehrmacht]] in 1943 on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]]. The first part of the name refers to the short northern section between [[Lake Peipus]] and the [[Baltic Sea]] at [[Narva]]. It stretched all the way south towards the [[Black Sea]] along the [[Dnieper]]. |
||
| ⚫ | The '''Panther–Wotan line''' |
||
==Planning== |
==Planning== |
||
After reverses on the |
After a number of strategic reverses on the Eastern Front in 1942, there were calls in early 1943 for the construction of fortifications and defenses-in-depth along the [[Dnieper]] river. After the [[Battle of Kursk]] and the [[German invasion of Italy|invasion of Italy]], the need arose to both conserve forces in the east as well as shift to defensive operations. [[Adolf Hitler]] ordered the construction of the defensive lines in August 1943; with this command, he demonstrated that he had accepted the fact that [[Nazi Germany]] was no longer capable of offensive operations in the east.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tunstall |first1=Brian |last2=Jacobsen |first2=J. A. |last3=Rohwer |first3=J. |date=1966 |title=Decisive Battles of World War II: The German View |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40184484 |journal=International Journal |volume=21 |issue=4 |pages=542 |doi=10.2307/40184484 |jstor=40184484 |issn=0020-7020}}</ref> |
||
A large portion of the line ran along the [[Dnieper River]], from just west of [[Smolensk]] to the [[Black Sea]]. The line left the banks of the Dnieper only where another major [[tributary]] offered similar defensive capabilities. In the south, where the Dnieper curved (western [[Dnipropetrovsk Oblast]]) to the west, it was decided to construct the line east of the Dnieper in order to avoid the evacuation or isolation of the [[Crimea]]. |
A large portion of the line ran along the [[Dnieper River]], from just west of [[Smolensk]] to the [[Black Sea]]. The line left the banks of the Dnieper only where another major [[tributary]] offered similar defensive capabilities. In the south, where the Dnieper curved (western [[Dnipropetrovsk Oblast]]) to the west, it was decided to construct the line east of the Dnieper in order to avoid the evacuation or isolation of the [[Crimea]]. |
||
When the order was signed for its construction on 11 August 1943, the Wehrmacht held positions sometimes hundreds of kilometers to the east of the proposed defensive line, generally along the [[Donets River]] in the south and along a line roughly from [[Smolensk]] to [[Leningrad]] in the north. |
When the order was signed for its construction on 11 August 1943, the Wehrmacht held positions sometimes hundreds of kilometers to the east of the proposed defensive line, generally along the [[Donets River]] in the south and along a line roughly from [[Smolensk]] to [[Leningrad]] in the north. |
||
==Defensive operations== |
==Defensive operations== |
||
The confidence in the effectiveness of the line was poor in [[Army Group North]], with its commander, General [[Georg von Küchler]], refusing to refer to the line by the "Panther Line" name for fear that it would instill false hope by his troops in its strength.<ref>{{cite book|last=Kaufmann |first=J.E.|author2=H.W. Kaufmann|title=Fortress Third Reich|page =282|publisher= DA Capo Press|year=2003}}</ref> Construction had barely started when Manstein's [[Army Group South]] commenced to fall back on it as part of a general withdrawal ordered on 15 September 1943.<ref>p.31, Baxter</ref> |
|||
The Red Army immediately attempted to break the line to deny [[OKH]] time to plan a long |
The Red Army immediately attempted to break the line to deny the [[OKH]] time to plan a long-term defence. It launched the [[Lower Dnieper strategic offensive operation]] along a 300 km front. The line was particularly weak in the area just north of the Black Sea where it departed from the Dnieper to cover the approaches to the Crimea. The Soviet [[Southern Front (Soviet Union)|Southern Front]] breached the barely constructed fortified line with relative ease, thereby cutting off the German [[17th Army (Wehrmacht)|17th Army]] on the Crimean Peninsula from its land retreat route. The Red Army casualties were 173,201 unrecoverable and 581,191 sick and wounded (total 754,392).<ref>see Krivosheev in sources <span style="font-family:Script MT;color:red">which pages?</span></ref> |
||
The fighting afterward involved the gradual establishment of multiple Soviet bridgeheads across the Dnieper. While the crossing operations of the Dnieper were difficult, the Wehrmacht was unable to dislodge the Red Army from its positions once across the river. The bridgeheads and the Soviet forces deployed in them grew. By late December 1943, [[Kiev]] had been taken by the Red Army and broke the line along the Dnieper, forcing a Wehrmacht retreat toward the 1939 Polish border.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}} |
The fighting afterward involved the gradual establishment of multiple Soviet bridgeheads across the Dnieper. While the crossing operations of the Dnieper were difficult, the Wehrmacht was unable to dislodge the Red Army from its positions once across the river. The bridgeheads and the Soviet forces deployed in them grew. By late December 1943, [[Kiev]] had been taken by the Red Army and broke the line along the Dnieper, forcing a Wehrmacht retreat toward the 1939 Polish border.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}} |
||
The only part of the line to remain in Wehrmacht possession after 1943 was the extreme northern section, the Panther line between [[Lake Peipus]] and the [[Baltic Sea]] at [[Narva]]. |
The only part of the line to remain in Wehrmacht possession after 1943 was the extreme northern section, the Panther line between [[Lake Peipus]] and the [[Baltic Sea]] at [[Narva]]. The small portion of the line was assaulted during the [[Battle for Narva Bridgehead|Battle of Narva]], with the [[Baltic States]] and the [[Gulf of Finland]] remaining in German hands well into 1944.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}} |
||
The defensive positions along the Dnieper were able to slow |
The defensive positions along the Dnieper were able to slow but not to stop the Soviet advance. The river was a considerable barrier, but the length of the line made it difficult to defend. The inability of the Germans to roll back the Soviet bridgeheads after they were established meant that the line could not be held.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}} |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
=== Bibliography === |
=== Bibliography === |
||
*{{cite book| first=Ian |last=Baxter |title=Into the Abyss: The Last Years |
*{{cite book| first=Ian |last=Baxter |title=Into the Abyss: The Last Years of The Waffen SS 1943–45, A Photographic History|publisher=Helion and Company |year=2006|isbn=978-1-874622-59-8}} |
||
*{{cite book| last= Krivosheev|first=G.F. |title=Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century|publisher=Greenhill Books|location=London|year=1997|isbn=1-85367-280-7}} |
*{{cite book| last= Krivosheev|first=G.F. |title=Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century|publisher=Greenhill Books|location=London|year=1997|isbn=1-85367-280-7}} |
||
*{{cite journal |
*{{cite journal |title=The Phantom Barrier: Ostwallbau 1944–1945 |first=Alastair |last=Noble |journal=War in History |year=2001 |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=442–67|doi=10.1177/096834450100800404 |s2cid=143188450 }} |
||
{{coord missing|Germany}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Panther-Wotan line}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Panther-Wotan line}} |
||
[[Category:German World War II defensive lines]] |
[[Category:German World War II defensive lines]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Military installations of the Wehrmacht]] |
||
[[Category:World War II sites in Ukraine]] |
|||
[[Category:World War II sites in Russia]] |
[[Category:World War II sites in Russia]] |
||
[[Category:World War II sites in Belarus]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:55, 6 April 2023
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2016) |
The Panther–Wotan line, or Ostwall in German, was a defensive line partially built by the German Wehrmacht in 1943 on the Eastern Front. The first part of the name refers to the short northern section between Lake Peipus and the Baltic Sea at Narva. It stretched all the way south towards the Black Sea along the Dnieper.
Planning
[edit]After a number of strategic reverses on the Eastern Front in 1942, there were calls in early 1943 for the construction of fortifications and defenses-in-depth along the Dnieper river. After the Battle of Kursk and the invasion of Italy, the need arose to both conserve forces in the east as well as shift to defensive operations. Adolf Hitler ordered the construction of the defensive lines in August 1943; with this command, he demonstrated that he had accepted the fact that Nazi Germany was no longer capable of offensive operations in the east.[1]
A large portion of the line ran along the Dnieper River, from just west of Smolensk to the Black Sea. The line left the banks of the Dnieper only where another major tributary offered similar defensive capabilities. In the south, where the Dnieper curved (western Dnipropetrovsk Oblast) to the west, it was decided to construct the line east of the Dnieper in order to avoid the evacuation or isolation of the Crimea.
When the order was signed for its construction on 11 August 1943, the Wehrmacht held positions sometimes hundreds of kilometers to the east of the proposed defensive line, generally along the Donets River in the south and along a line roughly from Smolensk to Leningrad in the north.
Defensive operations
[edit]The confidence in the effectiveness of the line was poor in Army Group North, with its commander, General Georg von Küchler, refusing to refer to the line by the "Panther Line" name for fear that it would instill false hope by his troops in its strength.[2] Construction had barely started when Manstein's Army Group South commenced to fall back on it as part of a general withdrawal ordered on 15 September 1943.[3]
The Red Army immediately attempted to break the line to deny the OKH time to plan a long-term defence. It launched the Lower Dnieper strategic offensive operation along a 300 km front. The line was particularly weak in the area just north of the Black Sea where it departed from the Dnieper to cover the approaches to the Crimea. The Soviet Southern Front breached the barely constructed fortified line with relative ease, thereby cutting off the German 17th Army on the Crimean Peninsula from its land retreat route. The Red Army casualties were 173,201 unrecoverable and 581,191 sick and wounded (total 754,392).[4]
The fighting afterward involved the gradual establishment of multiple Soviet bridgeheads across the Dnieper. While the crossing operations of the Dnieper were difficult, the Wehrmacht was unable to dislodge the Red Army from its positions once across the river. The bridgeheads and the Soviet forces deployed in them grew. By late December 1943, Kiev had been taken by the Red Army and broke the line along the Dnieper, forcing a Wehrmacht retreat toward the 1939 Polish border.[citation needed]
The only part of the line to remain in Wehrmacht possession after 1943 was the extreme northern section, the Panther line between Lake Peipus and the Baltic Sea at Narva. The small portion of the line was assaulted during the Battle of Narva, with the Baltic States and the Gulf of Finland remaining in German hands well into 1944.[citation needed]
The defensive positions along the Dnieper were able to slow but not to stop the Soviet advance. The river was a considerable barrier, but the length of the line made it difficult to defend. The inability of the Germans to roll back the Soviet bridgeheads after they were established meant that the line could not be held.[citation needed]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Tunstall, Brian; Jacobsen, J. A.; Rohwer, J. (1966). "Decisive Battles of World War II: The German View". International Journal. 21 (4): 542. doi:10.2307/40184484. ISSN 0020-7020. JSTOR 40184484.
- ^ Kaufmann, J.E.; H.W. Kaufmann (2003). Fortress Third Reich. DA Capo Press. p. 282.
- ^ p.31, Baxter
- ^ see Krivosheev in sources which pages?
Bibliography
[edit]- Baxter, Ian (2006). Into the Abyss: The Last Years of The Waffen SS 1943–45, A Photographic History. Helion and Company. ISBN 978-1-874622-59-8.
- Krivosheev, G.F. (1997). Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century. London: Greenhill Books. ISBN 1-85367-280-7.
- Noble, Alastair (2001). "The Phantom Barrier: Ostwallbau 1944–1945". War in History. 8 (4): 442–67. doi:10.1177/096834450100800404. S2CID 143188450.