Talk:Dracunculiasis/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
started the GA review |
m Mike Christie moved page Talk:Guinea worm disease/GA1 to Talk:Dracunculiasis/GA1 without leaving a redirect: Put GA subpage under current article name |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*The "method" being used in the lead image should be described. And is it effective? Do we have a ref for this? |
*The "method" being used in the lead image should be described. And is it effective? Do we have a ref for this? |
||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 17:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 17:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
::As I have become involved in editing the content of this article and the original nominated has moved on I will fail it, work further and renominate it in a bit.[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 03:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:36, 27 February 2023
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Comments
[edit]- The first subsection should be broken into two IMO.
- The see also section should be deleted with its content combined into the text of the article.
- There are a lot of capitals in the first sentence. Should Medina Worm be capitalized?
- "best documented" should be clarified to "most historically documented" as that seems to be what the ref is referring too
- The lead needs to be expanded. It currently does not speak about treatment options
- The "method" being used in the lead image should be described. And is it effective? Do we have a ref for this?
Reviewer: Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- As I have become involved in editing the content of this article and the original nominated has moved on I will fail it, work further and renominate it in a bit.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)