User talk:DietLimeCola: Difference between revisions
BJBot, Image:Nazz2.PNG is going to be deleted |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1 (Sept 2006-April 2007)]] |
|||
{{pp-semi|small=yes}} |
|||
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]]}} |
|||
== [[List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy]] == |
|||
[[/Archive 2|Archive 2 (May 2007-Jan 2008)]]}} |
|||
I do not believe that [[WP:EL|forums]] are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] information. [[User:Squirepants101|Squirepants101]] 22:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I suppose, I'll try to get a more reliable source later on. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] |
|||
== You're it == |
|||
You've just pulled the short straw and have been given the honour of being called "second-in-command" over at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network|CN Wikiproject]], The reason you've been given this position is beyond me but your name was put forwards twice and beggars can't be choosers. The real and much larger reason is down to [[User:Driveus|Driveus]] leaving Wikipedia to go tend to his field of crummy video clips over at YouTube and as such needing another person to control the general direction of a boat with no rudders or sails also known as the project. |
|||
Congratulations, your tenure will be a fruitful and successful one if you cut back the EEnE diet and move onto different articles as you're now playing with the slightly larger boys now. If of course you can't fill the size 8 house pumps left by the previous tenant then tell me because really, you're the last hope for the project having two people to manuver the project back upstream instead of one who'd rather jump overboard and let the beast fall over the waterfall given everyone else has gone AWOL anyway. |
|||
Once again, a presumptuous greetings to the world of ill-though out plans and strategies for an increasingly apathetic editorial staff. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 15:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
===What happened to the Fred Fredburger article=== |
|||
Black rhino ranger: Why did you delete the appearances? |
|||
:Read the edit summary! Its already mentioned what episodes he appeared in. All the other information there was flat out cruft. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 23:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Snakezilla: Please stop redirecting the articles or your blocked |
|||
== Article open == |
|||
THere is an article in season 5 of Ed,Edd n Eddy waiting to be edited. [[User:M.Naff]] |
|||
== I'm still not editing that... == |
|||
The project has eerily gone quiet... again. Something seems to be wrong and once again I'm losing interest in the whole thing. I may be co-ordinator but I certainly am not the only one attached. I think Driveus may have misread the need for a wikiproject based on such a subject predominantly edited by IP editors and the odd Naruto fan. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 21:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Well we just have to keep trying and fighting against those 12 year old kids on making a good article. Just because theres more bad CN editors than good ones does not mean that the pages should suffer with nothing but crap. We just have to keep trying. I hope nobody else leaves, however if they do then we need to get more people to keep this project alive. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 21:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Editing is it's own little side-issue and heck, I like reprimanding slightly devious editors who get all the stuff I took out back in. It isn't that, I do generally hate Naruto fans because more often than not they're complete dolts but there's a lot of fanism that just needs to be cut out. Currently a new article came up for [[Storm Hawks]], nothing wrong with the edits (some are still suspect and needs generalising further) but it's just that somehow they deigned it right that there be the lists for various elements to the show (locations, characters and episodes extrapolated from 2 shows) way before most of it has even aired. Don't know if to congratulate the kid who kicked it all of or split them one for jumping the gun. |
|||
::Ain't any of that though, the project has stopped and it's odd because I have so many ideas that when I put them forward nobody comments, adds anything to them or even writes again. I think I'm cursed, just want more input or new blood so it doesn't feel like the project has sloped off into inactivity besides one person holding it up and improving on it. Nobody plays ball and it just isn't fun playing on your lonesome. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 00:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::I read the comments, I just didn't comment on them, doesn't mean im not interested. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 03:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Never figured you're disinterested, can't understand why nobody will say something. Only time someone did say something is to tell me they're leaving! Sure it's not just a two=person project? You can understand my general feelings for the project as it does feel like it's gradually being deserted as nobody is maintaining the project but still editing as they would otherwise. I may have lost the meaning of the project, one moment. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 10:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Well, we just have to find people who are interested. I understand your feelings, and I feel this group is necessary. Just don't give up on this, we just need to work hard on finding more members. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 12:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Danny Daniel]] == |
|||
I don't know if you noticed or not, but in April, I made a [[User:Squirepants101/Danny Daniel|subpage]] that includes information about Danny Daniel, including likely sockpuppets. An admin told me to do it. If you see a Danny Daniel sockpuppet, add it to the likely sockpuppet heading and report it to [[WP:AIV]] (if the sockpuppet is very obvious) or [[WP:ANI]]. <font color="orange">[[User:Squirepants101|Pants]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Squirepants101|(T)]]</sup> 22:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Alright thanks. I'm pretty certain the one I reverted (the Inuyasha Gym Partner crossover crap) is him, since hes done that on an alt before. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 23:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:66.11.249.9]] == |
|||
Seeing as you are the goto guy for all vandals and the like (feel a bit left out now), consider giving warnings to this user as you did have to revert one of their more [[List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey|blatant useless edits]] from a few days earlier. I missed it as it occured the day after I warned them and sideswiped the 3RR so I'm figuring this one's a little savvy or just lucky. Thing is, it's a dynamic IP but not too much so otherwise I wouldn't be watching them so intently, bit hard to block them just like that. I'm using [[WP:TWINKLE|TW]] for my general "you screwed up" warning messages, give it a try if you're finding you do need to give off warnings and such regularly. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== And who told you to get rid of the B&M minor characters? == |
|||
And who told you to get rid of the B&M minor characters? No one, and I mean no told you to do that. Back off!! --[[User:Naruto134|Naruto134]] 00:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:-Sigh- It's cruft. No characters that have been in more than one episode are allowed. End of discussion, I won't tolerate your behavior. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 23:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Give it back, Traitor. This is Unacceptible. [[User:Black Rhino Ranger|Black Rhino Ranger]] 09:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Because maintaining character articles is just that hard... == |
|||
Someone reinserted every damn one shot again into [[List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey]], it was 2 days ago so I don't feel I can revert without damaging some constructive edits. Seeing as people do like to edit it so much and much of the guff in the article comes through via IP editors it's come to a point where there's only two solutions to stop this odd edit war. |
|||
# The article needs splitting off if people are determined to get minors back in, one shot or otherwise. Some may even appear twice but here's the bottom line as I see it, for a character to exist in the article (or articles) they should have around 3 appearances and have spoken in each of them in order to justify notability criteria otherwise it's a long list of minor characters to have appeared in a couple of episodes and never reappeared. If you can't write more than their species, what episode(s) they appeared in and what they did then they have little to no personality ergo non-notable. Writing up a basic episode synopsis doesn't count either. The strictest I'd go is for characters who have some recurring role and appear in most episodes, the core essentially, anyone else can go whistle. |
|||
# Lock the damn thing, soft lock though. Not exactly ideal but I know one EEnE article has got one so there's little reason why not. Detritus is added constantly and the minor characters keep returning which I'd say is some form of wrongdoing by adding non-essential fancruft. Lock it down and edits will be easier to track and warn wily editors should they not maintain it correctly. |
|||
There's also the idea of coming to a unilateral consensus on what goes in but these are IP editors here, let's be real. There's only 3 signed up editors who edit the damn thing regularly so I dunno, let the rot set in or cut it right out. Your input is totally appreciated. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 03:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I see what you mean, however I don't even watch that show, the only two shows I watch on Cartoon Network are Billy and Mandy and the Ed's, so I wouldn't actually know which characters appeared more than once. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 17:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I know and I don't watch much of it either, only because I can't and not because I don't want to. Nonetheless, even if we don't watch it it's fairly easy to maintain who stays in and who doesn't otherwise we'll just end up going back and forth with them re-entering and use deleting it later once it's caught. I'd rather not let the article just fill up with crap because we can't maintain it fully so I'm thinking semi-protection with a commented guideline specifying inclusion details even though it wouldn't fly on the principle that it's a [[WP:PPOL#Semi-protection|content dispute between registered users and anonymous users, with the intention to lock out the anonymous users.]] This is difficult, any suggestions?--<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 01:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== "Others" section (List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey) == |
|||
I believe some of the characters in the "Others" section are not one-shot. They're articles perhaps just need to be expanded. So, I don't think they should removed. [[User:FoxLad|FoxLad]] 06:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Well then only add the ones that are not one shot. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 15:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Um. == |
|||
OK, remember the discussion we had on [[List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey|this]] article? Someone suggest we put a semi-lock on it to prevent certain users and knowing that it's unlikely it'd be any good I said it wouldn't fly but couldn't say for sure. Went and did it anyway just to find out and was sick of the vandalism that had started to creep in and now find that there's a full lock on the article for 3 days which seems bizarre and probably leads right back to that particular admin being a bit of a jackass. Eitherway it's confirmed, we can't have any type of lock on the article and need to target the editors themselves even though they'll move onto a new IP address and continue this daft dispute. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 01:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:As a followup as I haven't seen much of you recently so this could all be academic to you, I've decided to just give in on the article. Idiots will edit it anyway and revert it to that old scraggy edit they particlarly like so why bother? They want the bloat, the cruft and the uneccesary, badly written garbage being "true fans", let them have it. --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 03:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I see that you got the article locked to unregistered types and newbies for 2 weeks, nice. It will start up again, if not the first edit available to them will be the big revert and we will have to go once more to RPP. Think a 3-strike rule applies here? --<font color="green">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 16:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Some are major and some are minor == |
|||
Hoss, Eris, Dracula, Jeff, Fred, and skarr are not minor characters, they are major characters, If they were minor, then they wouldn't have made more then 2 appearances and Boogie and Lord pain will make a thrid appearance in the second billy and mandy movie ([[Wrath of the Spider Queen]]). [[User:Chocolate Rhino|Chocolate Rhino]] 15:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
So? They're still minor. And "Thrid"? No such word. [[User:CBFan|CBFan]] 15:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I never removed those characters. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] 15:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:MaxieLogoFan]] == |
|||
Sorry about the Fred Fredburger article. To me, he's a major minor character because of the many big appearances he's in, but it ''is'' a merge so I will never do it again. I'm a little upset now <=( |
|||
== Just a shoutout == |
|||
Wondering what you have been doing. EEnE sure needs a few vigilant editors. Shoutout to DLC. You are missed. -- [[User:Elaich|<font color="#087180">Elaich</font>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><font color="#7C1034">talk</font></sup>]] 04:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Apology == |
|||
It is [[Rosh Hashana]], and I am here to give you a long-overdue apology forwhat happened about a year ago. I may have been a bit to harsh to you (as well as to quick to jump to conclusions) when you returned to Wikipedia with better intentions. I am also sorry for not apoligizing sooner, as you turned out to be a great editor on the [[Ed, Edd n Eddy]]-related articles. |
|||
I hope you except this long-overdue apology. --[[User:Wack'd About Wiki|Wack'd]] <sup>[[User talk:Wack'd About Wiki|Talk to me!]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wack'd About Wiki|Admire my handiwork!]]</sup> 19:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Wack'd, DLC's last contribution to Wikipedia was on July 26. Last edit summary was only the single word "gone." I think he/she got tired of all the continual posting of fancruft on cartoon articles, since DLC's edit summaries over the past months got more and more terse and annoyed. Too bad, became an excellent editor. Maybe DLC decided to leave this identity and begin again with a new one. It's not always easy, and sometimes you have to get very strict (which many people read as "angry") to preserve the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia. DLC, if you ever read this, we both appreciate your efforts and would like to see you return. -- [[User:Elaich|<font color="#087180">Elaich</font>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><font color="#7C1034">talk</font></sup>]] 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eenekids.PNG)== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Eenekids.PNG]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 14:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nexustklogo.jpg== |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Nexustklogo.jpg]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|||
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 11:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Barnstarred! == |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar2.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I wasn't about to go edit the rolling tarball of junk and cruft that is the [[List of characters in The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy|B&M list]] and not through lack of knowledge either. As the huge swathes of good edits you made won't last for too long and you'll be called turncoat and traitor once more as soon as someone notices some 14Kb has been clipped unceremoniously from their article, here's your first barnstar to commemorate this small yet historic event. <font color="#0D98DA">[[User:Treelo|treelo]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 13:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:Thanks! It feels good to be back. |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Komodo_lover#Komodo_lover]]== |
|||
See results, esp my last clerknote. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 02:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for that observation, it makes more sense now. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] ([[User talk:DietLimeCola|talk]]) 03:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::See new post there. Let us know if you see more, I've taken a personal interest in KL.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 03:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EdEddnEddy.png== |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:EdEddnEddy.png]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|||
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stopswop.PNG== |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Stopswop.PNG]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|||
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 06:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for the well wishes. I'm OK. It was just a period of being driven to distraction by the drive by editors, and especially those who insist on adding rumor and speculation as if it is fact. I am REALLY not looking forward to the release of this movie - NOT because I don't want to see it, but because of the mayhem it is going to unleash on this article. I am already stating to work on trying to get these pages completely protected during that time, so that the hubbub over the movie has time to die down before editing is allowed. Don't know if I can or not, but I'm trying. Thanks for being here to help. -- [[User:Elaich|<font color="#087180">Elaich</font>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><font color="#006666">talk</font></sup>]] 18:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah it's going to be a disaster. The other Cartoon Network movie articles had things like a poorly written essay of everything that happened, quotes and trivia. It's going to get messy, but we should think of a plan so we're prepared when that happens. Theres a few things that I question though. 1. Does it deserve it's own article? 2. A rumor states (and I'm not 100% either) that we'll see whats under Double D's hat, and Eddy's Brother will appear. Would these warrant mention on the characters page, or in the article/section of the movie itself, as well as any other big parts of character development? [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] ([[User talk:DietLimeCola#top|talk]]) 18:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm up for the sockpuppet thing. Get it started. I don't have much time during the week to go digging for proof, but this weekend, I will. -- [[User:Elaich|<font color="#087180">Elaich</font>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><font color="#006666">talk</font></sup>]] 05:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Is there any way for me to get a private message to you? I found something you'll be interested in, but I don't want to advertise it here. A throwaway email address or something? If you don't have one, I can get one. -- [[User:Elaich|<font color="#087180">Elaich</font>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><font color="#006666">talk</font></sup>]] 15:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Him again == |
== Him again == |
||
As you may know, Komodo Lover is back though not really gone. Anyway, keeping talks with Rlevse open about him open but I'm wondering why you or anyone else hasn't made a move on making the LTA dummypage you got into an actual standing LTA subpage yet. It's good here but ineffectual in the long run as you know. --< |
As you may know, Komodo Lover is back though not really gone. Anyway, keeping talks with Rlevse open about him open but I'm wondering why you or anyone else hasn't made a move on making the LTA dummypage you got into an actual standing LTA subpage yet. It's good here but ineffectual in the long run as you know. --[[User:Treelo|<span style="color:#0D98DA;">treelo</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Oh I forgot about that. Yeah, we need to get one up, I might make one later. I just checked the komodolover page and under the suspects it has some vandals edits I reverted yesterday. I just don't understand why he likes wasting our time with this stuff when we can just revert it in less than 5 seconds. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] ([[User talk:DietLimeCola#top|talk]]) 03:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
:Oh I forgot about that. Yeah, we need to get one up, I might make one later. I just checked the komodolover page and under the suspects it has some vandals edits I reverted yesterday. I just don't understand why he likes wasting our time with this stuff when we can just revert it in less than 5 seconds. [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] ([[User talk:DietLimeCola#top|talk]]) 03:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Well, we or an admin could move the page to a subpage as he seems to suffer from a mental condition (as does Claymort, another prolific vandal who I know has some severe mental condition) and is there mainly to timewaste even if we revert quickly. I figure a simple cut and paste to WP:LTA without a subpage might be good enough for now and might consder uprooting Squirepants' LTA page for Claymort and placing it there also as they're very ineffectual there. < |
::Well, we or an admin could move the page to a subpage as he seems to suffer from a mental condition (as does Claymort, another prolific vandal who I know has some severe mental condition) and is there mainly to timewaste even if we revert quickly. I figure a simple cut and paste to WP:LTA without a subpage might be good enough for now and might consder uprooting Squirepants' LTA page for Claymort and placing it there also as they're very ineffectual there. [[User:Treelo|<span style="color:#0D98DA;">treelo</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 16:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Komodo Lover sockpuppet suspects awaiting RFCU == |
== Komodo Lover sockpuppet suspects awaiting RFCU == |
||
After what seems to be quite a while and a bunch of edits inbetween, the list of unconfirmed usernames and IP addresses that are listed at the [[User:DietLimeCola/Komodo lover|LTV]] page has grown to a point where a checkuser for these accounts might be necessary. If you want to co-ordinate a case together with me and others then you may create or continue the conversation at the LTV talkpage if one doesn't exist already. < |
After what seems to be quite a while and a bunch of edits inbetween, the list of unconfirmed usernames and IP addresses that are listed at the [[User:DietLimeCola/Komodo lover|LTV]] page has grown to a point where a checkuser for these accounts might be necessary. If you want to co-ordinate a case together with me and others then you may create or continue the conversation at the LTV talkpage if one doesn't exist already. [[User:Treelo|<span style="color:#0D98DA;">treelo</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 02:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
<small>This message has been submitted to the following user's talkpage: {{user1|1=DietLimeCola}}, {{user1|1=Elaich}} You are welcome to inform others to this if you feel they might be able to help or have an interest in this issue.</small> |
<small>This message has been submitted to the following user's talkpage: {{user1|1=DietLimeCola}}, {{user1|1=Elaich}} You are welcome to inform others to this if you feel they might be able to help or have an interest in this issue.</small> |
||
| Line 159: | Line 20: | ||
==KL== |
==KL== |
||
What makes you think Rhode Island Red and GJ are KL socks? KL was in Malaysia then UK and these guys are in America. Finished rfcu fir fir now, SSP tomorrow.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 03:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
What makes you think Rhode Island Red and GJ are KL socks? KL was in Malaysia then UK and these guys are in America. Finished rfcu fir fir now, SSP tomorrow.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 03:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
:RIH and GJ aren't meatpuppets even if GJ would rather you felt they were, helps him to make others reckon they're dealing with multiple people when GJ is the main puppeteer in this case. KL might be GJ as they have the same line in abusive edits to those who have opposed them. DLC should be able to explain his inkling better than me but that's my reckoning. --< |
:RIH and GJ aren't meatpuppets even if GJ would rather you felt they were, helps him to make others reckon they're dealing with multiple people when GJ is the main puppeteer in this case. KL might be GJ as they have the same line in abusive edits to those who have opposed them. DLC should be able to explain his inkling better than me but that's my reckoning. --[[User:Treelo|<span style="color:#0D98DA;">treelo</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Treelo|talk]]</sub> 13:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
==AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters== |
==AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters== |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[List of Rugrats characters]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[List of Rugrats characters]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). |
||
| Line 185: | Line 46: | ||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 12:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 12:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== just mentioning == |
|||
Seems the B&M char list has gotten all a bit crufty once more. Give it a once over, seems it needs a bit of a rewrite in spots too. Also, archive some of your talkpage! Stuff on here going back to this time last year. |
|||
== April 2008 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:List of The Fairly OddParents episodes|, such as the one you made to [[:List of The Fairly OddParents episodes]],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ''May be improper revert, My apologies if so.'' [[User:Syberwolff|<span style="color:#339900;"><sup>SyBer</sup></span><span style="color:#003399;"><sub>WoLff</sub></span>]] 03:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Removing a fake episode called "Nigger Timmy" is not vandalism. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Fairly_OddParents_episodes&diff=205708112&oldid=205708033] [[User:DietLimeCola|DietLimeCola]] ([[User talk:DietLimeCola#top|talk]]) 23:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Sorry about that, was going fast that night and just saw an episode removed, didn't read it.[[User:Syberwolff|<span style="color:#339900;"><sup>SyBer</sup></span><span style="color:#003399;"><sub>WoLff</sub></span>]] 22:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Smile == |
|||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Smiley.svg|left|62px]] |
|||
-- [[User:Elaich|<span style="color:#087180;">Elaich</span>]] [[User talk: Elaich|<sup><span style="color:#006666;">talk</span></sup>]] has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> |
|||
</div><!-- Template:smile --> |
|||
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sesameabc.gif)== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Sesameabc.gif]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Should Adult Swim task force cover anime and off-network programming? == |
|||
Comments? Please visit [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cartoon Network/Adult Swim#Adult Swim|this discussion]]. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie|The New Age Retro Hippie]] [[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie|used Ruler!]] [[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie|Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.]] 21:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==MfD nomination of [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover]]== |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 21:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:TOON]] rollcall == |
|||
Hello DietLimeCola, it's been a while huh? You might remember adding your interest to work as part of the Cartoon Network Wikiproject here, since you did this there has been very little activity with few to none of the members participating or have been idle for some time and as such may be mothballing the Wikiproject as inactive. I'm going over the list for [[WP:TOON]] and need to know if you wish to still be a member. I know you might have not have edited in some time (at least through this account) but I'll wait until 5th January 2010 to see whether or not you still wish to be a part of this or not. If you don't respond to this notice specifically by mentioning it at [[WT:TOON]] (not my talkpage or here, I won't be watchlisting talkpages) or removing your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network/Members|the list]] I'll assume you are no longer interested and will remove your name. Hope you decide to work here again. [[User talk:Treelo|<span style="color:#94887C;">treelo</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Treelo|<sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda</sub>]] 18:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Main page appearance: Ed, Edd n Eddy == |
|||
This is a note to let the main editors of [[Ed, Edd n Eddy]] know that the article will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|today's featured article]] on July 23, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 23, 2012]]. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or his delegate {{user|Dabomb87}}, or start a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests]]. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions]]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
<div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File:Ed, Edd n Eddy logo.png|100px|''Ed, Edd n Eddy'' logo]]</div> |
|||
'''''[[Ed, Edd n Eddy]]''''' is an [[Cartoon series|animated television series]] created by [[Danny Antonucci]] and produced by Canada-based [[Danny Antonucci#Biography|a.k.a. Cartoon]]. It premiered on [[Cartoon Network]] on January 4, 1999, and ended on November 8, 2009 with the premiere of the series' TV movie finale, ''[[List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes#Film|Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show]]''. Designed to resemble classic cartoons from the 1940s to the 1970s, the series revolves around three adolescent boys known as "the Eds", who constantly invent schemes to make money from their peers to purchase [[Gobstopper|jawbreakers]]. Their plans usually fail, leaving them in various predicaments. Before signing a contract with Cartoon Network, Antonucci approached [[Nickelodeon]], but the channel demanded creative control of the show, which Antonucci did not agree to. Several specials, shorts, and video games either based on the series or featuring the series' characters have been produced. Viewed from 31 million households in 29 countries by both children and adults, ''Ed, Edd n Eddy'' received positive reviews and several awards and nominations. It remains the longest-running [[Cartoon Network original series and movies|original Cartoon Network series]] and Canadian-made animated series to date. ('''[[Ed, Edd n Eddy|more...]]''') |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
[[User:UcuchaBot|UcuchaBot]] ([[User talk:UcuchaBot|talk]]) 23:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 --> |
|||
==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hollywood Squares (NES video game) boaxart.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
Thank you for uploading '''[[:File:Hollywood Squares (NES video game) boaxart.jpg]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free|image copyright tag]]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. |
|||
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F7|section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> |
|||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Page history|page history]] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 01:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 13 February 2023
Him again
[edit]As you may know, Komodo Lover is back though not really gone. Anyway, keeping talks with Rlevse open about him open but I'm wondering why you or anyone else hasn't made a move on making the LTA dummypage you got into an actual standing LTA subpage yet. It's good here but ineffectual in the long run as you know. --treelo talk 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh I forgot about that. Yeah, we need to get one up, I might make one later. I just checked the komodolover page and under the suspects it has some vandals edits I reverted yesterday. I just don't understand why he likes wasting our time with this stuff when we can just revert it in less than 5 seconds. DietLimeCola (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, we or an admin could move the page to a subpage as he seems to suffer from a mental condition (as does Claymort, another prolific vandal who I know has some severe mental condition) and is there mainly to timewaste even if we revert quickly. I figure a simple cut and paste to WP:LTA without a subpage might be good enough for now and might consder uprooting Squirepants' LTA page for Claymort and placing it there also as they're very ineffectual there. treelo talk 16:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Komodo Lover sockpuppet suspects awaiting RFCU
[edit]After what seems to be quite a while and a bunch of edits inbetween, the list of unconfirmed usernames and IP addresses that are listed at the LTV page has grown to a point where a checkuser for these accounts might be necessary. If you want to co-ordinate a case together with me and others then you may create or continue the conversation at the LTV talkpage if one doesn't exist already. treelo talk 02:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This message has been submitted to the following user's talkpage: DietLimeCola (talk · contribs), Elaich (talk · contribs) You are welcome to inform others to this if you feel they might be able to help or have an interest in this issue.
Crips r us
[edit]Thought you might like to have a look at this. Any thoughts? GlassCobra 03:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
KL
[edit]What makes you think Rhode Island Red and GJ are KL socks? KL was in Malaysia then UK and these guys are in America. Finished rfcu fir fir now, SSP tomorrow. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- RIH and GJ aren't meatpuppets even if GJ would rather you felt they were, helps him to make others reckon they're dealing with multiple people when GJ is the main puppeteer in this case. KL might be GJ as they have the same line in abusive edits to those who have opposed them. DLC should be able to explain his inkling better than me but that's my reckoning. --treelo talk 13:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters
[edit]
An editor has nominated List of Rugrats characters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rugrats characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Hallelujah! Spring is finally here...
[edit]
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Cinemaniac (talk • contribs • critique) 03:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Nazz2.PNG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Nazz2.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please se WP:NFCC#10a ("Attribution of the source of the material") and WP:CITE#IMAGE ("If you download an image from the web, you should give the URL"). I found the Ed, Edd n Eddy section of cartonnetwork.com, but I couldn't find this image of Nazz there. What's the URL of this image where you found it? --Geniac (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nazz2.PNG)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Nazz2.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
just mentioning
[edit]Seems the B&M char list has gotten all a bit crufty once more. Give it a once over, seems it needs a bit of a rewrite in spots too. Also, archive some of your talkpage! Stuff on here going back to this time last year.
April 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of The Fairly OddParents episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. May be improper revert, My apologies if so. SyBerWoLff 03:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Removing a fake episode called "Nigger Timmy" is not vandalism. [1] DietLimeCola (talk) 23:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that, was going fast that night and just saw an episode removed, didn't read it.SyBerWoLff 22:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Smile
[edit]
-- Elaich talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sesameabc.gif)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sesameabc.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Should Adult Swim task force cover anime and off-network programming?
[edit]Comments? Please visit this discussion. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover
[edit]Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 21:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello DietLimeCola, it's been a while huh? You might remember adding your interest to work as part of the Cartoon Network Wikiproject here, since you did this there has been very little activity with few to none of the members participating or have been idle for some time and as such may be mothballing the Wikiproject as inactive. I'm going over the list for WP:TOON and need to know if you wish to still be a member. I know you might have not have edited in some time (at least through this account) but I'll wait until 5th January 2010 to see whether or not you still wish to be a part of this or not. If you don't respond to this notice specifically by mentioning it at WT:TOON (not my talkpage or here, I won't be watchlisting talkpages) or removing your name from the list I'll assume you are no longer interested and will remove your name. Hope you decide to work here again. treelo radda 18:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Main page appearance: Ed, Edd n Eddy
[edit]This is a note to let the main editors of Ed, Edd n Eddy know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 23, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 23, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Ed, Edd n Eddy is an animated television series created by Danny Antonucci and produced by Canada-based a.k.a. Cartoon. It premiered on Cartoon Network on January 4, 1999, and ended on November 8, 2009 with the premiere of the series' TV movie finale, Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show. Designed to resemble classic cartoons from the 1940s to the 1970s, the series revolves around three adolescent boys known as "the Eds", who constantly invent schemes to make money from their peers to purchase jawbreakers. Their plans usually fail, leaving them in various predicaments. Before signing a contract with Cartoon Network, Antonucci approached Nickelodeon, but the channel demanded creative control of the show, which Antonucci did not agree to. Several specials, shorts, and video games either based on the series or featuring the series' characters have been produced. Viewed from 31 million households in 29 countries by both children and adults, Ed, Edd n Eddy received positive reviews and several awards and nominations. It remains the longest-running original Cartoon Network series and Canadian-made animated series to date. (more...)
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hollywood Squares (NES video game) boaxart.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Hollywood Squares (NES video game) boaxart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
_boaxart.jpg){kind=link}
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC)