Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Smart: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:01, 13 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

William John Smart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a WP:COI or WP:AUTOBIO. The-Pope (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. This appears to be this guy's CV, and there are no real indications of notability. Nick-D (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for biographies. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[William John Smart]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|William John Smart}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Smart|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 10#{{anchorencode:William John Smart}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Architecture|list of Architecture-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' per nomination. This appears to be this guy's CV, and there are no real indications of notability. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' The subject of the article lacks [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable third party sources]] and fails the [[WP:BIO|notability guidelines for biographies]]. [[User:Alpha Quadrant|<span style="color:#000070; font-family:Times New Roman">Alpha_Quadrant</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Quadrant|<span style="color:#00680B; font-family:Times New Roman">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>