Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noman Group of Industries: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:43, 13 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noman Group of Industries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this passes WP:NCORP based on the single source that is not self-published. Dolescum (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only 1 possibly reliable reference, from website of major Bangladeshi newspaper. The other is "under development," therefore new and not a reliable source, so the article fails WP:N. 6 of 8 references are from company literature, ergo WP:SPAM. Tapered (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom, per above. Doesn't pass notability, likely WP:ADMASQ. ~ nafSadh did say 22:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *'''Delete''' Only 1 possibly reliable reference, from website of major Bangladeshi newspaper. The other is "under development," therefore new and not a reliable source, so the article fails [[WP:N]]. 6 of 8 references are from company literature, ergo [[WP:SPAM]]. [[User:Tapered|Tapered]] ([[User talk:Tapered|talk]]) 20:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''', per nom, per above. Doesn't pass notability, likely [[WP:ADMASQ]]. ~ ''[[User:Nafsadh|<span style="color:#004F99">nafSadh</span>]] [[special:contributions/Nafsadh|did]] [[User talk:Nafsadh|say]]'' 22:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>