Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payam Turk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Payam Turk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Payam Turk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Payam Turk

Musical artist whose article makes no claim of satisfying general notability or musical notability. An article should speak for itself and should explain why the subject is notable without the need for the reader to review the references, and this article does not do that. A check of the references is useless anyway. They are all to music streaming services.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	SoundCloud	User-generated content	No			No
2	YouTube	User-generated content	No			No
3	Deezer	Music streaming service: User-generated content	No			No
4	Spotify	Music streaming service: User-generated content	No			No
5	Nifrətim Artır Sənə	YouTube	No			No
6	Dostum	Deezer	No			No
7	Üzü qaralar	Deezer	No			No
8	Gəl - Üzü qaralar	Deezer	No			No
9	Mənən Türk	Deezer	No			No
10	Gecə yarı	Spotify	No			No
11	nifret	SoundCloud	No			No
12	Yaradan	SoundCloud	No			No

There is no independent significant coverage. Naïve Google search is useless also. It shows that the subject uses social media, and shows the same musical works that are available on the music streaming services.

This article was moved to draft space once by reviewer User:DMySon, and was immediately moved back to article space by the originator without change or improvement. Since the originator is not interested in developing the article, the community has no obligation to be interested in keeping in the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Clear indication of non notable musical artist, fails WP:GNG also unable to satisfy WP:SINGER. DMySon (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per DMySon. Having songs doesn't mean someone's notable. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. Fancruft. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable (per all of the above). Eagleash (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of any SIGCOV from reliable/independent sources or claim of notability in the article.Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV & WP:NMUSICIANJuggyevil (talk) 19:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, non notable musician -Xclusivzik (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.