View source for User talk:IJBall

{{Page mover topicon}}
{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit|User talk:IJBall}}|autoconfirmed|{{editnotice
| text =
{{Font|size=13.5px|Due to recent disruption here, newly registered and IP editors may not be able to post to my Talk page. If you can't post a message on this page, please post your message to your own talk page and ping me instead – write <nowiki>{{ping|IJBall}}</nowiki> in the message and don't forget to sign your post. Thank you.}}
| textstyle = background-color: lightpink;
}}}}
<!-- {{busy|image=Imbox_notice.png|This editor|with real-life work obligations currently}} {{Semi-wikibreak2}} {{Wikibreak}} 
{{tmbox
| type      = 
| image     = [[File:Sunset at Huntington Beach.jpg|80px]]
| style     = width: 832px; 
| textstyle = color: black; 
| text      = {{{name|'''{{ROOTPAGENAME}}'''}}} is on a [[WP:SWB|semi-wikibreak]] for the rest of the summer – some days I'll be around a lot; other days I won't be around at all. Mahalo.
}}
{{tmbox
| type      = 
| image     = [[File:Information.svg|40px]]
| style     = width: 832px; 
| textstyle = color: black; 
| text      = {{{name|'''{{ROOTPAGENAME}}'''}}} is on an prolonged [[WP:SWB|semi-wikibreak]]. Work will likely be preventing me from making anything more than [[WP:GNOME|WikiGnoming]] edits for much of the time, for the next several months.
}} -->
{{tmbox
| type      = 
| image     = [[File:Information.svg|40px]]
| style     = width: 832px; 
| textstyle = color: black; 
| text      = NOTE: This editor has [[WP:Page mover|Page mover]] rights, and is willing to do uncontroversial page moves (esp. [[WP:ROUNDROBIN|round-robin page moves]]) upon request. Please make such requests at this Talk page by clicking on the "New section" tab above.
}}
{{User talk top}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archiveheader = {{tan}}
| maxarchivesize = 80K
| counter = 30
| minthreadsleft = 0
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| algo = old(21d)
| archive = User talk:IJBall/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Archives | auto =  | search = yes | target = | bot = | age = 21 | units = days | index = }}

== [[List of films based on television programs]] ==
<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 23:28, 19 March 2027 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1805498902}}
Pinging {{U|Geraldo Perez}} – this is more a reminder to myself than to you, Geraldo: but the [[WP:SCOPE]] of [[List of films based on television programs]] looks like it needs to be (massively?) narrowed. Right now it's including a bunch of what are basically TV movies in the list (including some TV movies that basically aired as ''episodes'' of these series – e.g. I just removed [[Shake It Up: Made In Japan]] which should not have been included under ''any'' circumstances!). That list should be narrowed to just ''theatrically''-released films that are based on TV series. FWIW. (And, again, this is more a reminder to myself...) --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 23:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
* See also: [[List of television spin-offs]] to do the same. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 03:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC) ‎
* And: [[Lists of actors by television series]] is another cleanup job... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 01:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

== Very fast ==
{{Moved discussion to|Talk:Isabela Moner#Date of birth}}

== ''[[Kickin' It]]'' ==

<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 18:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1577818642}}

Not really an issue, but more of a general question. Is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kickin%27_It&curid=31783868&diff=886240107&oldid=886200207 this] correct? She was main cast for the first three seasons, before leaving to work on ''I Didn't Do It''. She only special guest starred ''three'' times in the fourth season, which as we know does not recurring make. So is that correct? Does her previously being main cast count toward being recurring? [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] (<small>[[User talk:Amaury|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Amaury|contribs]]</small>) 00:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
: And [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Kickin%27_It_characters&curid=33582415&diff=886564330&oldid=886564213 this]. Isn't that the whole point of a list of characters page, so you can not only go into more detail rather than a brief synopsis, but also really list a lot notable characters rather than just a few? In fact, I think that's basically what you stated here: [[User talk:IJBall/Archive 20#Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn]]. {{tq|I find including a 'Guest cast' section less objectionable for a LoC article.}}. Although in our cases, we're limiting it to notable guest stars only. Those who receive a special guest star credit automatically qualify as notable, and then from there we go with who we think is notable—for example, main cast from a fellow series on the same network guest starring on another series makes them notable. At the very least, shouldn't it be discussed before outright removing it? Note that I'm not the one who added it, I just changed it to "Notable guest stars" so we're not listing every single non-recurring guest star, as that definitely does become excessive. I accordingly simultaneously added and removed from the original list. Courtesy ping for {{U|AngusWOOF}} so they can provide their thoughts, as they are the ones responsible for removing the section, and also because they participated in that semi-related discussion at {{U|Geraldo Perez}}'s talk page here: [[User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 16#How to list guest stars when actor and/or character name changes?]]. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] (<small>[[User talk:Amaury|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Amaury|contribs]]</small>) 02:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

: Regarding Kim in season 4, three appearances in that season could be recurring, but depends on how the editors for the series define recurring.  Some go with 2 or more separate storyline appearances in a season, others are 3 or more. As for guest stars, I removed that from the List of Characters since those are usually stated on the episode lists themselves.  For the names, yeah, we can go back to the discussion in the archive. I might have gotten some of those wrong, but it's definitely not appropriate to have "Sensei Ty / Ty". [[User:AngusWOOF|<strong><span style="color: #606060;">AngusWOOF</span></strong>]] ([[User talk:AngusWOOF#top|<span style=" color: #663300;">bark</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/AngusWOOF|<span style="color: #006600;">sniff</span>]]) 02:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
:: {{re|AngusWOOF}} Sorry for the incredibly late response. {{tq|As for guest stars, I removed that from the List of Characters since those are usually stated on the episode lists themselves.}} That doesn't seem like a valid or logical reason for removal and I will have to ''respectfully'' disagree. If we are to use that logic, we shouldn't be listing recurring guest stars, either, since they're listed in the episode list as well. When there isn't enough content for a separate character list page, you typically only include main and recurring stars on the parent article, though you can include notable guest stars as well, provided you state which episodes they appear in. Additionally, bios should generally be brief. Then when or if a character list page is created, that's where you can not only go into a lot more detail in the bios, but also list a lot more non-recurring guest stars, within reason. We should not list ''every single'' non-recurring guest star, only the notable ones. Those who receive a special guest star credit are automatically notable. Likewise, if a main cast member from one series guest stars on another series on the same network or franchise, that also makes them automatically notable. For example, [[Kelli Berglund]] guest starring as Sloane on ''Kickin' It'' is notable because she is a main cast member on ''Lab Rats'', and both series are from Disney XD. Similarly, [[Milo Manheim]] guest starring as Pierce on ABC's ''American Housewife'' is also notable because he is a main cast member on Disney Channel's ''Zombies'', and ABC and Disney Channel are both part of the Disney network franchise. After that, for non-recurring guest stars who fall into neither of those categories, it should be discussed why they are considered notable. For example, a guest star from one series guest starring on another series on the same network is not necessarily notable. While I can certainly look at cutting back what I had a little for anyone who doesn't fit into those two categories I mentioned, I don't think outright removing the section is the answer. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] (<small>[[User talk:Amaury|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Amaury|contribs]]</small>) 15:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

== Question... ==

There seems to be some contentions with another member where [[MOS:DATERANGE]] is concerned and soap character articles; someone believes that if someone marries in, let's say September 2019, and it is now November, and they are still married — despite actual dates not existing in in-universe fiction — that should be reflected in the infobox, as simply stating {{xt|2019}} is "misleading," so it should be {{!xt|September 2019–present}}. What's your thoughts on this? '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 14:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
: {{Re|livelikemusic}} I would say that, while clunky, "September 2019–present" or "Sept 2019–present" would at least be acceptable in [[MOS:DATERANGE]] terms (and, so, maybe, on a [[WP:IAR]] basis). However, I would also say that when 2020 roles around, I would change it to "2019–present". --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 15:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|IJBall}} But wouldn't that, in realistic terms, over-ride the intentions of what {{TI|Infobox soap character}} represents, which is an overview? Besides, even in terms of November, {{!xt|November 2019–present}} would still defy MOS:DATERANGE, as November 2019 is the present? This is where I find much complications with the soap character infobox, and my beliefs that only ''current'' marriages should be mentioned, etc. There is '''too''' much [[WP:FANCRUFT|clutter and fluff]] filling it up. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 15:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
::: Probably merits a wider discussion. Or it can be ignored as an "exception" if it only affects a couple of articles... Separately, yes – "November 2019–present" would violate [[MOS:DATERANGE]] again, and should not be done (but "September 2019–present" is OK in terms of [[MOS:DATERANGE]]). --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 16:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
::::{{Reply to|IJBall}} It is times like this that I wish the soap community was still active on Wikipedia. Thank you! '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 16:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::{{Reply to|IJBall}} Seems the conflict with this specific editor is coming to a head — they're violating MOS:YEAR and MOS:DATERANGE in an attempt to [[WP:OWN|own the edit]]. This has been an on-going battle; what do you suggest I do? '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 13:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::: {{Re|livelikemusic}} Next step – go to their Talk page, and try to talk to them. If that gets you nowhere, you're probably stuck with either [[WP:3O]] or [[WP:DR]], if there aren't other editors with an interest in these articles and this issue. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 13:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::::{{Reply to|IJBall}} I've tried, several times across other talk pages, and they seem persistent on their edits being the "know all" for the pages they edit, and it seems to stem from a long-term history of disruptive editing. I may have to reach out to 3O and/or DR, because I doubt the user is going to see any other edit besides their own; they flat-out are removing marriage years, in an attempt to own the page. See [[Jennifer Horton]] and [[Jack Deveraux]], etc for example. I cite MOS:DATERANGE, and they continue to ignore, while removing current marriage year, because it's like again that they do not like {{xt|2019}}, despite that being appropriate. And then on [[Kristen DiMera]] do not understand that a marriage was done under false pretense, and is invalidated, because it could never be legal, even in the terms of the in-universe world. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 13:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::::: {{Re|livelikemusic}} If it's slow-motion edit-warring, you can try [[WP:ANEW]]. Also, if there's an Admin you know, you try asking them for advice as well. (FTR, I agree with your edits at a glance (in MOS terms), but as I'm not as much of an "expert" on the history of DOOL, so I can't say for sure which dateranges are actually correct...) --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 13:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::::::{{Reply to|IJBall}} I used to have discussions with a couple of admins a few years back, so I could try reaching out to them and seeing their thoughts on the situation, too. Thank you. Sorry to bother you, once again. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 13:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
{{outdent}}
Thanks for your help with the editor conflict — seems like they're going to continue to edit-war, as they've even undone your edits. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 19:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
: I'd be tempted to report them, then. I'd at least talk to an Admin about it... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 22:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
:: I did last week; they said to report them. But I did warn them as a precaution, in case someone said there was no warning. You think I should file an ANI now? '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 22:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
::: I think you maybe should, especially if this has been a longer-term issue. But they've been reverted by (at least?) two different editors on MOS grounds, so at this point their edits would appear to not be based in policy (despite what they say), and they're effectively edit warring to boot... However, you may also want to wait to collect more evidence of EW-like behavior before filing... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 22:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
:::: By my count: they've been reverted by four members, across ''multiple'' articles. According to my count, it's been you, me, {{nping|TAnthony}} and {{noping|Jester66}}. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 00:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
::::: Am filing a report now, because they clearly are not understanding the complication of this issue, and it's out of control. '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 14:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

== The Hollow Crown ==

I was about to open a RM about the "episodes" of this [[The Hollow Crown (TV series)|TV series]] but got stuck because the sources used do indeed call these films. I haven't watched this so am not sure, but this sounds to me like a production trying to grandiose their show. The "films" were released in two groups (aka seasons), were released on a weekly schedule (as in any regular TV series with episodes would) and are called "episodes" on the BBC website (as well as IMDB and Amazon listing). The TV series article for the show is a mess, using "episodes", "films" and "plays" to describe them. Any ideas? --[[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 17:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
: {{Re|Gonnym}} This is just my opinion – but probably best to consider these as either a "[TV] series of miniseries", or a "[TV] series of television films". So I think I'd treat either each separate entry as, effectively a "TV film" (even if it's "two-part" "TV film" as a couple of them are)... So, I think I agree with {{U|Woodensuperman}}'s (since "retired") solution – treat the two "Henry" ones as "two-part TV films" that are "episodes" of the larger "TV series franchise" ("The Hollow Crown"). So I'd advocate a merge of [[Henry VI, Part 1 (film)]] and [[Henry VI, Part 2 (film)]] into a single article, at [[:Henry VI, Part 1 and Part 2 (The Hollow Crown)]], and either leave all the others where they are or move the other single-part TV films to, for example, [[:Richard II (The Hollow Crown)]]... But this is all likely to be controversial (except possibly the article merge), so it should probably go through an [[WP:RM]]. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 17:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

== Name seems so familiar ==

Hi {{u|IJBall}},

I have to be careful not to [[WP:OUTING|out]] you, so I'll refrain from using what I ''think'' is your first name. Per your comment at [[Talk:CPAC (TV channel)]]. your username looks so familiar. At first I wondered if I'd seen your name on the B.C. discussion forum of B.C. radio stations, but I don't think that's it. Did you, by chance, used to contribute regularly to the rec.arts.tv newsgroup? I used to post semi-regularly there, but have had other commitments and haven't checked in in a number of years.

If ''so'', nice to hear from you again.

If ''not'', nice to meet you!

Cheers,<br />
- --[[User:Dmehus|Doug Mehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 00:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

==You've got mail! again==
{{you've got mail|subject=|ts=07:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)}}
[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:#008751;">Aussie</span><span style="color:#fcd116;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 07:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

: {{Re|AussieLegend}} Respectfully, I understand your point, but I'm not inclined to "help" out on this anymore... Still, if there's a concrete proposal down the line, I guess let me know. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 07:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

== Maggie Geha ==

Hi IJBall, I am very sorry about my editing mistakes on the Maggie Geha article. I know my edits are not disruptive and I know I did not make vandalism. But I didn't know my edit is unnecessary. I am asking your for help and your advice. I tried my edits and it was all unnecessary by you. Please do not give me a warning and I am giving you some advice so I'll do better than that next time. I promise I will be careful with those unnecessary edits you controlled your articles. So I am very very sorry for my editing mistakes and it was unnecessary. If you can accept my apology, that would be great. So I promise I'll be careful next time when I edit. Thanks for your time. [[Special:Contributions/2001:569:7C07:2600:A893:F5F1:1E30:4AD2|2001:569:7C07:2600:A893:F5F1:1E30:4AD2]] ([[User talk:2001:569:7C07:2600:A893:F5F1:1E30:4AD2|talk]]) 04:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

== [[Special:Contributions/117.222.198.45|117.222.198.45]] ==

Hi IJBall,
<br>This ip address is a problematic editor as this person repeatedly disruptive editing on several TV series starting from yesterday. [[Special:Contributions/117.222.198.45|117.222.198.45]] may need to be report to [[WP:ANI]]. — [[User:YoungForever|<span style="color: #E63E62;font-family:Georgia;">'''Young'''</span><span style="color: #414A4C;font-family:Georgia;">'''Forever'''</span>]][[User talk: YoungForever|<sup style="color: #2D68C4F">(talk)</sup>]]  18:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
: They need to get to a Level 4 warning – after that, they can be reported to [[WP:AIV]] (or [[WP:ANEW]]). --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 18:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]].   <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ''Note: this is not a report on you, but someone you've dealt with.'' '''<span style="font-size:85%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#ab83ab">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:85%;">[[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:CadetBlue">talk!</span>]]</span> 14:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

== ''[[Coop & Cami Ask the World]]'' ==

No official [[WP:RS]] yet, but according to Ruby Rose Turner's Instagram story, season two has been picked up for ten additional episodes, bringing the season to 31 total. Definitely a popular series. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 04:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

== ''[[The Casagrandes]]'' ==

I'm going to need more eyes here, as this disruptive IP will not quit. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 15:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

=== ''[[Sydney to the Max]]'' ===

Likewise for ''[[Sydney to the Max]]'', I may need eyes. Given that the IP seems to be "familiar" with me, I'm thinking we've got some sort of block evasion or socking. I can't say that with 100% certainty, though, of course. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 07:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
: It's Orchomen. IP address geolocates to the UAE. So just the usual. Revert until they're blocked for the I don't know what time. I've lost track. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 08:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
:: If it's Orchomen, the good news is that [[WP:3RRNO]] is in effect (though I wouldn't revert too many times – I'd just report, and revert after they've been blocked...). But if it's Orchomen IPs, those can go straight to [[WP:AIV]] with no problem, as they're block evasion... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 13:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
::: What do we think about [[Special:Contributions/Copyvioburner|Copyvioburner]]? I think we have a [[WP:DUCK]] case here, in which case an SPI should be filed. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 17:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
:::: Did you see this? Thoughts? [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 17:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
::::: Wait... – It's likely, but if they edit again we'd have more proof. They've been silent since then, and we're aware of it, so it's not a big priority... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 18:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::: I just reverted an already blocked IP of Orchomen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Loubna_Abidar&diff=927315469&oldid=927097580 here]. We'll see what happens. If that user reverts, there will be our proof. ''Add'': What typo am I missing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Descendants_(2015_film)&diff=prev&oldid=927104778 here]? Because I see nothing different. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 18:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
::::::: I think we have our proof now. What do you think? [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 18:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=926750357 -->

== [[List of American television programs by debut date]] ==

Do you know if there is a reason why (a) this is sorted from newer to oldest and not correctly the other way around? and (b) why this uses a list and not a sortable table? --[[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 14:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
: "Fixing" this article has been discussed on its talk page, at least once (and probably more than once). But "fixing" this article would be a ''massive'' undertaking, and so far no one has seriously wanted to put in the time or effort (I certainly don't!!). My own personal take is that I consider the list to be too [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]] (and too large) to bother with – IOW, rather than "fixing" it, I'd actually favor deleting it! While something like [[List of American television programs currently in production]] is a useful and sensible exercise, I don't think this particular list is or is worth keeping. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 14:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
::To be honest, I agree with you on deleting it, just thought you were in favor of keeping it. --[[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 14:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
::: I'm not motivated enough to AfD it myself, but if someone else takes it there, I'm a "delete" vote for it. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 14:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

== [[Loubna Abidar]] ==

I've added a citation needed tag for now to give legitimate people time to find a good source, but if it should be removed entirely, that's fine, too! [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 19:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
: Looks like removing it entirely is the best option, and that's what {{U|Floquenbeam}} has done, which is of course completely fine. Thanks, Flo! [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 19:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
::I really have no business editing right now; too busy IRL.  I had a free second, so I was about to handle their AIV report, but got distracted.  I came back a little later out of curiousity to see what ended up happening, and noticed the BLP vio.  BLP trumps LTA, but I know when the LTA is making dozens of edits, it's impossible to keep up with every single one. A little disconcerting that the unsourced rape allegation has been there uncontested since it was added by an IP in June. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
::: {{re|Floquenbeam}} I will make sure to keep note of BLP -> LTA for the future. Thank you very much. [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 19:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

== ''[[Elena of Avalor]]'' ==

Per [[Talk:The Loud House#Propose list of characters split]], ''[[The Casagrandes]]'', and the general discussions we've had in the past, I'm inclined to remove everyone except those listed as principal cast [http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/elena-of-avalor/ here] for ''Elena of Avalor''. It's just ridiculously long, but it's not long enough for a character list article. ''Big City Greens'' makes it easy, as you have your main characters in the opening sequence, and it distinguishes guest stars from minor roles as well. Anything listed under "additional voices" is minor and shouldn't be listed. What's listed before that are clearly significant guest stars and are listed. ''Add'': And as it is, it's doing it wrong, anyway. It should only be "main," "recurring," and "notable." [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] • 03:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
: This is a general problem with animation articles – cast bloat. However, it looks like a good chunk of those under 'Villains' would actually qualify as "notable" guest stars. I have no idea what to do with 'Supporting', as I don't watch the show, but it would definitely make sense to convert that into a 'Recurring' cast section (restricting to only those in 5 or more episodes). --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 04:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

== Q: Is BTVA (Behind the Voice Actors) Detered From Meeting [[WP: RS|Reliable Sourcing]] Criteria?  ==

Hey, came back from a two month long vacation. This website has been used for a couple voice actors such as Cree Summer and Frank Welker for which roles that have been verified by them. 

It may look like a visual and audio repository for voice artists and their roles throughout these six mediums: TV series movies commercials video games shorts and amusement park attractions but it is in reality full of [[WP: USERG|user-generated content]] for said voice artists.  

So do you think that BTVA is disregarded from meeting reliable sourcing? 

Bye, 

[[Special:Contributions/47.16.146.238|47.16.146.238]] ([[User talk:47.16.146.238|talk]]) 21:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)